Cargando…

Assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (MRSIM) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION: Assessing the use of a radiation therapy (RT) planning MRI performed in the treatment position (pMRI) on target volume delineation and effect on organ at risk dose for oropharyngeal cancer patients planned with diagnostic MRI (dMRI) and CT scan. METHODS: Diagnostic MRI scans were acqui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richardson, Haylea, Kumar, Mahesh, Tieu, Minh Thi, Parker, Joel, Dowling, Jason A., Arm, Jameen, Best, Leah, Greer, Peter B., Clapham, Matthew, Oldmeadow, Christopher, O’Connor, Laura, Wratten, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34676994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.552
_version_ 1784662165511208960
author Richardson, Haylea
Kumar, Mahesh
Tieu, Minh Thi
Parker, Joel
Dowling, Jason A.
Arm, Jameen
Best, Leah
Greer, Peter B.
Clapham, Matthew
Oldmeadow, Christopher
O’Connor, Laura
Wratten, Chris
author_facet Richardson, Haylea
Kumar, Mahesh
Tieu, Minh Thi
Parker, Joel
Dowling, Jason A.
Arm, Jameen
Best, Leah
Greer, Peter B.
Clapham, Matthew
Oldmeadow, Christopher
O’Connor, Laura
Wratten, Chris
author_sort Richardson, Haylea
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Assessing the use of a radiation therapy (RT) planning MRI performed in the treatment position (pMRI) on target volume delineation and effect on organ at risk dose for oropharyngeal cancer patients planned with diagnostic MRI (dMRI) and CT scan. METHODS: Diagnostic MRI scans were acquired for 26 patients in a neutral patient position using a 3T scanner (dMRI). Subsequent pMRI scans were acquired on the same scanner with a flat couch top and the patient in their immobilisation mask. Each series was rigidly registered to the patients planning CT scan and volumes were first completed with the CT/dMRI. The pMRI was then made available for volume modification. For the group with revised volumes, two IMRT plans were developed to demonstrate the impact of the modification. Image and registration quality was also evaluated. RESULTS: The pMRI registration led to the modification of target volumes for 19 of 26 participants. The pMRI target volumes were larger in absolute volume resulting in reduced capacity for organ sparing. Predominantly, modifications occurred for the primary gross tumour volume (GTVp) with a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.7 and the resulting high risk planning target volume, a mean DSC of 0.89. Both MRIs scored similarly for image quality, with the pMRI demonstrating improved registration quality and efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: A pMRI provides improvement in registration efficiency, quality and a higher degree of oncologist confidence in target delineation. These results have led to a practice change within our department, where a pMRI is acquired for all eligible oropharyngeal cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8892428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88924282022-03-10 Assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (MRSIM) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy Richardson, Haylea Kumar, Mahesh Tieu, Minh Thi Parker, Joel Dowling, Jason A. Arm, Jameen Best, Leah Greer, Peter B. Clapham, Matthew Oldmeadow, Christopher O’Connor, Laura Wratten, Chris J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Assessing the use of a radiation therapy (RT) planning MRI performed in the treatment position (pMRI) on target volume delineation and effect on organ at risk dose for oropharyngeal cancer patients planned with diagnostic MRI (dMRI) and CT scan. METHODS: Diagnostic MRI scans were acquired for 26 patients in a neutral patient position using a 3T scanner (dMRI). Subsequent pMRI scans were acquired on the same scanner with a flat couch top and the patient in their immobilisation mask. Each series was rigidly registered to the patients planning CT scan and volumes were first completed with the CT/dMRI. The pMRI was then made available for volume modification. For the group with revised volumes, two IMRT plans were developed to demonstrate the impact of the modification. Image and registration quality was also evaluated. RESULTS: The pMRI registration led to the modification of target volumes for 19 of 26 participants. The pMRI target volumes were larger in absolute volume resulting in reduced capacity for organ sparing. Predominantly, modifications occurred for the primary gross tumour volume (GTVp) with a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.7 and the resulting high risk planning target volume, a mean DSC of 0.89. Both MRIs scored similarly for image quality, with the pMRI demonstrating improved registration quality and efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: A pMRI provides improvement in registration efficiency, quality and a higher degree of oncologist confidence in target delineation. These results have led to a practice change within our department, where a pMRI is acquired for all eligible oropharyngeal cancer patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-22 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8892428/ /pubmed/34676994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.552 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Richardson, Haylea
Kumar, Mahesh
Tieu, Minh Thi
Parker, Joel
Dowling, Jason A.
Arm, Jameen
Best, Leah
Greer, Peter B.
Clapham, Matthew
Oldmeadow, Christopher
O’Connor, Laura
Wratten, Chris
Assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (MRSIM) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy
title Assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (MRSIM) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy
title_full Assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (MRSIM) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy
title_fullStr Assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (MRSIM) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (MRSIM) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy
title_short Assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (MRSIM) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy
title_sort assessing the impact of magnetic resonance treatment simulation (mrsim) on target volume delineation and dose to organs at risk for oropharyngeal radiotherapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34676994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.552
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonhaylea assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT kumarmahesh assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT tieuminhthi assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT parkerjoel assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT dowlingjasona assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT armjameen assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT bestleah assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT greerpeterb assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT claphammatthew assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT oldmeadowchristopher assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT oconnorlaura assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy
AT wrattenchris assessingtheimpactofmagneticresonancetreatmentsimulationmrsimontargetvolumedelineationanddosetoorgansatriskfororopharyngealradiotherapy