Cargando…
Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines
BACKGROUND: The American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) issued a 2021 update of Uniform Validation Guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screeners. With each update it is important for each manufacturer to update the Instrument Referral Criteria (IRC) progr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8893268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250260 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S342666 |
_version_ | 1784662354124865536 |
---|---|
author | Arnold, Robert Silbert, David Modjesky, Heather |
author_facet | Arnold, Robert Silbert, David Modjesky, Heather |
author_sort | Arnold, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) issued a 2021 update of Uniform Validation Guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screeners. With each update it is important for each manufacturer to update the Instrument Referral Criteria (IRC) programed into their devices in order to optimize sensitivity and specificity to detect AAPOS criteria. METHODS: De-identified data comparing photoscreening with simultaneous confirmatory examinations constituted separate cohorts for the development of IRC via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The refractions of the devices were also compared. RESULTS: This study defines three sets of refractive IRC (Sensitive, Medium, and Specific) for three leading infrared photoscreening devices, PlusoptiX A12, Welch-Allyn SPOT, and Adaptica 2WIN for children < 4 and ≥ 4 years in order to better target the 2021 AAPOS guidelines. The cohorts were similar but the SPOT group (n=755, mean age 9) was older with more astigmatism and the 2WIN (n=1362, mean age 7) was younger with more hyperopia and anisometropia compared to the cohort for PlusoptiX A12 (n=616, mean age 8). The age-based, medium magnitude IRC for anisometropia, hyperopia, astigmatism and myopia for SPOT were: <4y: 1.5, 1.75, 3.25, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.5, 1.75, 2.25, 2.0; for PlusoptiX: <4y: 1.75, 3.0, 3.5, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.75, 3.0, 2.5, 2.5; and for 2WIN: <4y: 1.75, 2.5, 3.5, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 2.0. The mean ABCD ellipsoid spectacle matches differed; SPOT: 1.8±1.3 (better) versus PlusoptiX: 1.9±1.6 and 2WIN: 2.2±1.4 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The 2021 AAPOS exam guidelines foster early specificity before age 4 and sensitivity after age 4. These evidence-based IRC for current SPOT, PlusoptiX, and 2WIN photoscreeners should allow device manufacturers the data necessary to adjust their device IRC to maximize specificity, sensitivity or a medium between the two. This paper provides practical suggestions for better validation. Improved early screening combined with thorough treatment should reduce life-long vision impairment due to amblyopia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8893268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88932682022-03-04 Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines Arnold, Robert Silbert, David Modjesky, Heather Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) issued a 2021 update of Uniform Validation Guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screeners. With each update it is important for each manufacturer to update the Instrument Referral Criteria (IRC) programed into their devices in order to optimize sensitivity and specificity to detect AAPOS criteria. METHODS: De-identified data comparing photoscreening with simultaneous confirmatory examinations constituted separate cohorts for the development of IRC via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The refractions of the devices were also compared. RESULTS: This study defines three sets of refractive IRC (Sensitive, Medium, and Specific) for three leading infrared photoscreening devices, PlusoptiX A12, Welch-Allyn SPOT, and Adaptica 2WIN for children < 4 and ≥ 4 years in order to better target the 2021 AAPOS guidelines. The cohorts were similar but the SPOT group (n=755, mean age 9) was older with more astigmatism and the 2WIN (n=1362, mean age 7) was younger with more hyperopia and anisometropia compared to the cohort for PlusoptiX A12 (n=616, mean age 8). The age-based, medium magnitude IRC for anisometropia, hyperopia, astigmatism and myopia for SPOT were: <4y: 1.5, 1.75, 3.25, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.5, 1.75, 2.25, 2.0; for PlusoptiX: <4y: 1.75, 3.0, 3.5, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.75, 3.0, 2.5, 2.5; and for 2WIN: <4y: 1.75, 2.5, 3.5, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 2.0. The mean ABCD ellipsoid spectacle matches differed; SPOT: 1.8±1.3 (better) versus PlusoptiX: 1.9±1.6 and 2WIN: 2.2±1.4 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The 2021 AAPOS exam guidelines foster early specificity before age 4 and sensitivity after age 4. These evidence-based IRC for current SPOT, PlusoptiX, and 2WIN photoscreeners should allow device manufacturers the data necessary to adjust their device IRC to maximize specificity, sensitivity or a medium between the two. This paper provides practical suggestions for better validation. Improved early screening combined with thorough treatment should reduce life-long vision impairment due to amblyopia. Dove 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8893268/ /pubmed/35250260 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S342666 Text en © 2022 Arnold et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Arnold, Robert Silbert, David Modjesky, Heather Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines |
title | Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines |
title_full | Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines |
title_fullStr | Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines |
title_short | Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines |
title_sort | instrument referral criteria for plusoptix, spot and 2win targeting 2021 aapos guidelines |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8893268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250260 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S342666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arnoldrobert instrumentreferralcriteriaforplusoptixspotand2wintargeting2021aaposguidelines AT silbertdavid instrumentreferralcriteriaforplusoptixspotand2wintargeting2021aaposguidelines AT modjeskyheather instrumentreferralcriteriaforplusoptixspotand2wintargeting2021aaposguidelines |