Cargando…

What’s in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories

Automatic facial coding (AFC) is a novel research tool to automatically analyze emotional facial expressions. AFC can classify emotional expressions with high accuracy in standardized picture inventories of intensively posed and prototypical expressions. However, classification of facial expressions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Höfling, T. Tim A., Alpers, Georg W., Büdenbender, Björn, Föhl, Ulrich, Gerdes, Antje B. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8893617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263863
_version_ 1784662440571568128
author Höfling, T. Tim A.
Alpers, Georg W.
Büdenbender, Björn
Föhl, Ulrich
Gerdes, Antje B. M.
author_facet Höfling, T. Tim A.
Alpers, Georg W.
Büdenbender, Björn
Föhl, Ulrich
Gerdes, Antje B. M.
author_sort Höfling, T. Tim A.
collection PubMed
description Automatic facial coding (AFC) is a novel research tool to automatically analyze emotional facial expressions. AFC can classify emotional expressions with high accuracy in standardized picture inventories of intensively posed and prototypical expressions. However, classification of facial expressions of untrained study participants is more error prone. This discrepancy requires a direct comparison between these two sources of facial expressions. To this end, 70 untrained participants were asked to express joy, anger, surprise, sadness, disgust, and fear in a typical laboratory setting. Recorded videos were scored with a well-established AFC software (FaceReader, Noldus Information Technology). These were compared with AFC measures of standardized pictures from 70 trained actors (i.e., standardized inventories). We report the probability estimates of specific emotion categories and, in addition, Action Unit (AU) profiles for each emotion. Based on this, we used a novel machine learning approach to determine the relevant AUs for each emotion, separately for both datasets. First, misclassification was more frequent for some emotions of untrained participants. Second, AU intensities were generally lower in pictures of untrained participants compared to standardized pictures for all emotions. Third, although profiles of relevant AU overlapped substantially across the two data sets, there were also substantial differences in their AU profiles. This research provides evidence that the application of AFC is not limited to standardized facial expression inventories but can also be used to code facial expressions of untrained participants in a typical laboratory setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8893617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88936172022-03-04 What’s in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories Höfling, T. Tim A. Alpers, Georg W. Büdenbender, Björn Föhl, Ulrich Gerdes, Antje B. M. PLoS One Research Article Automatic facial coding (AFC) is a novel research tool to automatically analyze emotional facial expressions. AFC can classify emotional expressions with high accuracy in standardized picture inventories of intensively posed and prototypical expressions. However, classification of facial expressions of untrained study participants is more error prone. This discrepancy requires a direct comparison between these two sources of facial expressions. To this end, 70 untrained participants were asked to express joy, anger, surprise, sadness, disgust, and fear in a typical laboratory setting. Recorded videos were scored with a well-established AFC software (FaceReader, Noldus Information Technology). These were compared with AFC measures of standardized pictures from 70 trained actors (i.e., standardized inventories). We report the probability estimates of specific emotion categories and, in addition, Action Unit (AU) profiles for each emotion. Based on this, we used a novel machine learning approach to determine the relevant AUs for each emotion, separately for both datasets. First, misclassification was more frequent for some emotions of untrained participants. Second, AU intensities were generally lower in pictures of untrained participants compared to standardized pictures for all emotions. Third, although profiles of relevant AU overlapped substantially across the two data sets, there were also substantial differences in their AU profiles. This research provides evidence that the application of AFC is not limited to standardized facial expression inventories but can also be used to code facial expressions of untrained participants in a typical laboratory setting. Public Library of Science 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8893617/ /pubmed/35239654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263863 Text en © 2022 Höfling et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Höfling, T. Tim A.
Alpers, Georg W.
Büdenbender, Björn
Föhl, Ulrich
Gerdes, Antje B. M.
What’s in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories
title What’s in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories
title_full What’s in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories
title_fullStr What’s in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories
title_full_unstemmed What’s in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories
title_short What’s in a face: Automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories
title_sort what’s in a face: automatic facial coding of untrained study participants compared to standardized inventories
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8893617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263863
work_keys_str_mv AT hoflingttima whatsinafaceautomaticfacialcodingofuntrainedstudyparticipantscomparedtostandardizedinventories
AT alpersgeorgw whatsinafaceautomaticfacialcodingofuntrainedstudyparticipantscomparedtostandardizedinventories
AT budenbenderbjorn whatsinafaceautomaticfacialcodingofuntrainedstudyparticipantscomparedtostandardizedinventories
AT fohlulrich whatsinafaceautomaticfacialcodingofuntrainedstudyparticipantscomparedtostandardizedinventories
AT gerdesantjebm whatsinafaceautomaticfacialcodingofuntrainedstudyparticipantscomparedtostandardizedinventories