Cargando…

The efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Apraxia and action disorganization syndrome (AADS) after stroke can disrupt activities of daily living (ADL). Occupational therapy has been effective in improving ADL performance, however, inclusion of multiple tasks means it is unclear which therapy elements contribute to improvement. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howe, Jo, Chua, Winnie, Sumner, Emily, Drozdowska, Bogna, Laverick, Rosanna, Bevins, Rachel L., Jean-Baptiste, Emilie, Russell, Martin, Rotshtein, Pia, Wing, Alan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8893688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264678
_version_ 1784662464976125952
author Howe, Jo
Chua, Winnie
Sumner, Emily
Drozdowska, Bogna
Laverick, Rosanna
Bevins, Rachel L.
Jean-Baptiste, Emilie
Russell, Martin
Rotshtein, Pia
Wing, Alan M.
author_facet Howe, Jo
Chua, Winnie
Sumner, Emily
Drozdowska, Bogna
Laverick, Rosanna
Bevins, Rachel L.
Jean-Baptiste, Emilie
Russell, Martin
Rotshtein, Pia
Wing, Alan M.
author_sort Howe, Jo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Apraxia and action disorganization syndrome (AADS) after stroke can disrupt activities of daily living (ADL). Occupational therapy has been effective in improving ADL performance, however, inclusion of multiple tasks means it is unclear which therapy elements contribute to improvement. We evaluated the efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation, comparing training in making a cup of tea with a stepping training control condition. METHODS: Of the 29 stroke survivors with AADS who participated in this cross-over randomized controlled feasibility trial, 25 were included in analysis [44% females; mean(SD) age = 71.1(7.8) years; years post-stroke = 4.6(3.3)]. Participants attended five 1-hour weekly tea making training sessions in which progress was monitored and feedback given using a computer-based system which implemented a Markov Decision Process (MDP) task model. In a control condition, participants received five 1-hour weekly stepping sessions. RESULTS: Compared to stepping training, tea making training reduced errors across 4 different tea types. The time taken to make a cup of tea was reduced so the improvement in accuracy was not due to a speed-accuracy trade-off. No improvement linked to tea making training was evident in a complex tea preparation task (making two different cups of tea simultaneously), indicating a lack of generalisation in the training. CONCLUSIONS: The clearly specified but flexible training protocol, together with information on the distribution of errors, provide pointers for further refinement of task model approaches to ADL rehabilitation. It is recommended that the approach be tested under errorless learning conditions with more impaired patients in future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 5(th) August 2019 [NCT04044911] https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04044911?term=Cogwatch&rank=1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8893688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88936882022-03-04 The efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: A randomised controlled trial Howe, Jo Chua, Winnie Sumner, Emily Drozdowska, Bogna Laverick, Rosanna Bevins, Rachel L. Jean-Baptiste, Emilie Russell, Martin Rotshtein, Pia Wing, Alan M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Apraxia and action disorganization syndrome (AADS) after stroke can disrupt activities of daily living (ADL). Occupational therapy has been effective in improving ADL performance, however, inclusion of multiple tasks means it is unclear which therapy elements contribute to improvement. We evaluated the efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation, comparing training in making a cup of tea with a stepping training control condition. METHODS: Of the 29 stroke survivors with AADS who participated in this cross-over randomized controlled feasibility trial, 25 were included in analysis [44% females; mean(SD) age = 71.1(7.8) years; years post-stroke = 4.6(3.3)]. Participants attended five 1-hour weekly tea making training sessions in which progress was monitored and feedback given using a computer-based system which implemented a Markov Decision Process (MDP) task model. In a control condition, participants received five 1-hour weekly stepping sessions. RESULTS: Compared to stepping training, tea making training reduced errors across 4 different tea types. The time taken to make a cup of tea was reduced so the improvement in accuracy was not due to a speed-accuracy trade-off. No improvement linked to tea making training was evident in a complex tea preparation task (making two different cups of tea simultaneously), indicating a lack of generalisation in the training. CONCLUSIONS: The clearly specified but flexible training protocol, together with information on the distribution of errors, provide pointers for further refinement of task model approaches to ADL rehabilitation. It is recommended that the approach be tested under errorless learning conditions with more impaired patients in future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 5(th) August 2019 [NCT04044911] https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04044911?term=Cogwatch&rank=1 Public Library of Science 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8893688/ /pubmed/35239707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264678 Text en © 2022 Howe et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Howe, Jo
Chua, Winnie
Sumner, Emily
Drozdowska, Bogna
Laverick, Rosanna
Bevins, Rachel L.
Jean-Baptiste, Emilie
Russell, Martin
Rotshtein, Pia
Wing, Alan M.
The efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: A randomised controlled trial
title The efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: A randomised controlled trial
title_full The efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: A randomised controlled trial
title_short The efficacy of a task model approach to ADL rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: A randomised controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of a task model approach to adl rehabilitation in stroke apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8893688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264678
work_keys_str_mv AT howejo theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chuawinnie theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sumneremily theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT drozdowskabogna theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT laverickrosanna theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bevinsrachell theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jeanbaptisteemilie theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT russellmartin theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rotshteinpia theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wingalanm theefficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT howejo efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chuawinnie efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sumneremily efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT drozdowskabogna efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT laverickrosanna efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bevinsrachell efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jeanbaptisteemilie efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT russellmartin efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rotshteinpia efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wingalanm efficacyofataskmodelapproachtoadlrehabilitationinstrokeapraxiaandactiondisorganisationsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial