Cargando…

DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND: Improving the osteosarcoma (OS) patients' survival has long been a challenge, even though the disease's treatment is on the verge of progress. DNA damage response (DDR) has traditionally been associated with carcinogenesis, tumor growth, and genomic instability. No study has us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Ying, Liu, Yan-xia, Huang, Xiuning, Li, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9365953
_version_ 1784662545540317184
author Tang, Ying
Liu, Yan-xia
Huang, Xiuning
Li, Peng
author_facet Tang, Ying
Liu, Yan-xia
Huang, Xiuning
Li, Peng
author_sort Tang, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving the osteosarcoma (OS) patients' survival has long been a challenge, even though the disease's treatment is on the verge of progress. DNA damage response (DDR) has traditionally been associated with carcinogenesis, tumor growth, and genomic instability. No study has used DDR genes as a signature to identify the prognosis of OS. The goal of this work was to find an effective possible DDR gene biomarker for predicting OS prognosis, which may be useful in clinical diagnosis and therapy. METHODS: To assess gene methylation, univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were performed on data from OS patients. The data were retrieved from public databases, including the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). RESULTS: The DDR gene signature was chosen, which included seven genes (NHEJ1, RMI2, SWI5, ERCC2, CLK2, POLG, and MLH1). In the TARGET dataset, patients were categorized into two groups: high-risk and low-risk. Patients with a high-risk score revealed a shorter OS rate (hazard ratio (HR): 3.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–4.34, P < 0.001) in comparison with the patients with a low-risk score in the TARGET as a training group. The validation of the prognostic signature accuracy was carried out in relapse and validation cohorts (TARGET, n = 75; GSE21257, n = 53). The signature was found to be an independent predictive factor for OS in multivariate cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model was developed to predict an individual's risk of OS. DDR gene signature involved in Fanconi anemia pathway, nonhomologous end−joining pathway, mismatch repair, and nucleotide excision repair pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the identified novel DDR genes could be a powerful prognostic tool for prognosis evaluation and a valuable tool in predicting the risk factors in OS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8894034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88940342022-03-04 DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma Tang, Ying Liu, Yan-xia Huang, Xiuning Li, Peng J Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Improving the osteosarcoma (OS) patients' survival has long been a challenge, even though the disease's treatment is on the verge of progress. DNA damage response (DDR) has traditionally been associated with carcinogenesis, tumor growth, and genomic instability. No study has used DDR genes as a signature to identify the prognosis of OS. The goal of this work was to find an effective possible DDR gene biomarker for predicting OS prognosis, which may be useful in clinical diagnosis and therapy. METHODS: To assess gene methylation, univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were performed on data from OS patients. The data were retrieved from public databases, including the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). RESULTS: The DDR gene signature was chosen, which included seven genes (NHEJ1, RMI2, SWI5, ERCC2, CLK2, POLG, and MLH1). In the TARGET dataset, patients were categorized into two groups: high-risk and low-risk. Patients with a high-risk score revealed a shorter OS rate (hazard ratio (HR): 3.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–4.34, P < 0.001) in comparison with the patients with a low-risk score in the TARGET as a training group. The validation of the prognostic signature accuracy was carried out in relapse and validation cohorts (TARGET, n = 75; GSE21257, n = 53). The signature was found to be an independent predictive factor for OS in multivariate cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model was developed to predict an individual's risk of OS. DDR gene signature involved in Fanconi anemia pathway, nonhomologous end−joining pathway, mismatch repair, and nucleotide excision repair pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the identified novel DDR genes could be a powerful prognostic tool for prognosis evaluation and a valuable tool in predicting the risk factors in OS patients. Hindawi 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8894034/ /pubmed/35251167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9365953 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ying Tang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Ying
Liu, Yan-xia
Huang, Xiuning
Li, Peng
DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma
title DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma
title_full DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma
title_fullStr DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma
title_full_unstemmed DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma
title_short DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma
title_sort dna damage response genes in osteosarcoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9365953
work_keys_str_mv AT tangying dnadamageresponsegenesinosteosarcoma
AT liuyanxia dnadamageresponsegenesinosteosarcoma
AT huangxiuning dnadamageresponsegenesinosteosarcoma
AT lipeng dnadamageresponsegenesinosteosarcoma