Cargando…
DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma
BACKGROUND: Improving the osteosarcoma (OS) patients' survival has long been a challenge, even though the disease's treatment is on the verge of progress. DNA damage response (DDR) has traditionally been associated with carcinogenesis, tumor growth, and genomic instability. No study has us...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9365953 |
_version_ | 1784662545540317184 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Ying Liu, Yan-xia Huang, Xiuning Li, Peng |
author_facet | Tang, Ying Liu, Yan-xia Huang, Xiuning Li, Peng |
author_sort | Tang, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving the osteosarcoma (OS) patients' survival has long been a challenge, even though the disease's treatment is on the verge of progress. DNA damage response (DDR) has traditionally been associated with carcinogenesis, tumor growth, and genomic instability. No study has used DDR genes as a signature to identify the prognosis of OS. The goal of this work was to find an effective possible DDR gene biomarker for predicting OS prognosis, which may be useful in clinical diagnosis and therapy. METHODS: To assess gene methylation, univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were performed on data from OS patients. The data were retrieved from public databases, including the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). RESULTS: The DDR gene signature was chosen, which included seven genes (NHEJ1, RMI2, SWI5, ERCC2, CLK2, POLG, and MLH1). In the TARGET dataset, patients were categorized into two groups: high-risk and low-risk. Patients with a high-risk score revealed a shorter OS rate (hazard ratio (HR): 3.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–4.34, P < 0.001) in comparison with the patients with a low-risk score in the TARGET as a training group. The validation of the prognostic signature accuracy was carried out in relapse and validation cohorts (TARGET, n = 75; GSE21257, n = 53). The signature was found to be an independent predictive factor for OS in multivariate cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model was developed to predict an individual's risk of OS. DDR gene signature involved in Fanconi anemia pathway, nonhomologous end−joining pathway, mismatch repair, and nucleotide excision repair pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the identified novel DDR genes could be a powerful prognostic tool for prognosis evaluation and a valuable tool in predicting the risk factors in OS patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8894034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88940342022-03-04 DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma Tang, Ying Liu, Yan-xia Huang, Xiuning Li, Peng J Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Improving the osteosarcoma (OS) patients' survival has long been a challenge, even though the disease's treatment is on the verge of progress. DNA damage response (DDR) has traditionally been associated with carcinogenesis, tumor growth, and genomic instability. No study has used DDR genes as a signature to identify the prognosis of OS. The goal of this work was to find an effective possible DDR gene biomarker for predicting OS prognosis, which may be useful in clinical diagnosis and therapy. METHODS: To assess gene methylation, univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were performed on data from OS patients. The data were retrieved from public databases, including the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). RESULTS: The DDR gene signature was chosen, which included seven genes (NHEJ1, RMI2, SWI5, ERCC2, CLK2, POLG, and MLH1). In the TARGET dataset, patients were categorized into two groups: high-risk and low-risk. Patients with a high-risk score revealed a shorter OS rate (hazard ratio (HR): 3.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–4.34, P < 0.001) in comparison with the patients with a low-risk score in the TARGET as a training group. The validation of the prognostic signature accuracy was carried out in relapse and validation cohorts (TARGET, n = 75; GSE21257, n = 53). The signature was found to be an independent predictive factor for OS in multivariate cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model was developed to predict an individual's risk of OS. DDR gene signature involved in Fanconi anemia pathway, nonhomologous end−joining pathway, mismatch repair, and nucleotide excision repair pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the identified novel DDR genes could be a powerful prognostic tool for prognosis evaluation and a valuable tool in predicting the risk factors in OS patients. Hindawi 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8894034/ /pubmed/35251167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9365953 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ying Tang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tang, Ying Liu, Yan-xia Huang, Xiuning Li, Peng DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma |
title | DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma |
title_full | DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma |
title_fullStr | DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma |
title_short | DNA Damage Response Genes in Osteosarcoma |
title_sort | dna damage response genes in osteosarcoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9365953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangying dnadamageresponsegenesinosteosarcoma AT liuyanxia dnadamageresponsegenesinosteosarcoma AT huangxiuning dnadamageresponsegenesinosteosarcoma AT lipeng dnadamageresponsegenesinosteosarcoma |