Cargando…

Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the bond strength and deflection of four types of bonded lingual retainers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro, experimental study, 160 extracted, mandibular incisors were mounted in acrylic blocks in sets of two and randomized into four groups for bonding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golshah, Amin, Feyli, Shirin Asadian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1707520
_version_ 1784662550412001280
author Golshah, Amin
Feyli, Shirin Asadian
author_facet Golshah, Amin
Feyli, Shirin Asadian
author_sort Golshah, Amin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the bond strength and deflection of four types of bonded lingual retainers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro, experimental study, 160 extracted, mandibular incisors were mounted in acrylic blocks in sets of two and randomized into four groups for bonding of 1.0.010 × 0.026-inch Bond-A-Braid®, 0.012 × 0.027-inch Retanium®(TM), 0.038 × 0.016-inch Ortho FlexTech®, and 0.0175-inch three-strand retainer wires; 15 mm of passive wire was adhered to the lingual tooth surface using Transbond XT composite. The shear (SBS) and tensile (TBS) bond strength values were measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score and deflection of wires were also determined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by the chi-square test and ANOVA. RESULTS: The four groups were significantly different regarding the ARI scores (P < 0.05). Significant differences were noted between the three-strand and all other groups in deflection (P < 0.05). The Retanium group had significant differences with other groups in peak SBS (P < 0.05). A significant difference was found between the Retanium and Ortho Flex groups in break SBS (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also reported between the three-strand and all other groups in peak TBS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Retanium retainer had the maximum SBS, while the three-strand retainer had the maximum TBS. The three-strand and Retanium wires can probably better tolerate intraoral forces and have higher resistance to fracture due to having higher TBS. Also, the three-strand wire had lower deflection rate, which highlights its higher resistance to occlusal forces. Retanium and Ortho FlexTech wires had the most favorable failure modes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8894051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88940512022-03-04 Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers Golshah, Amin Feyli, Shirin Asadian Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the bond strength and deflection of four types of bonded lingual retainers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro, experimental study, 160 extracted, mandibular incisors were mounted in acrylic blocks in sets of two and randomized into four groups for bonding of 1.0.010 × 0.026-inch Bond-A-Braid®, 0.012 × 0.027-inch Retanium®(TM), 0.038 × 0.016-inch Ortho FlexTech®, and 0.0175-inch three-strand retainer wires; 15 mm of passive wire was adhered to the lingual tooth surface using Transbond XT composite. The shear (SBS) and tensile (TBS) bond strength values were measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score and deflection of wires were also determined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by the chi-square test and ANOVA. RESULTS: The four groups were significantly different regarding the ARI scores (P < 0.05). Significant differences were noted between the three-strand and all other groups in deflection (P < 0.05). The Retanium group had significant differences with other groups in peak SBS (P < 0.05). A significant difference was found between the Retanium and Ortho Flex groups in break SBS (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also reported between the three-strand and all other groups in peak TBS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Retanium retainer had the maximum SBS, while the three-strand retainer had the maximum TBS. The three-strand and Retanium wires can probably better tolerate intraoral forces and have higher resistance to fracture due to having higher TBS. Also, the three-strand wire had lower deflection rate, which highlights its higher resistance to occlusal forces. Retanium and Ortho FlexTech wires had the most favorable failure modes. Hindawi 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8894051/ /pubmed/35251180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1707520 Text en Copyright © 2022 Amin Golshah and Shirin Asadian Feyli. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Golshah, Amin
Feyli, Shirin Asadian
Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers
title Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers
title_full Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers
title_fullStr Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers
title_full_unstemmed Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers
title_short Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers
title_sort bond strength and deflection of four types of bonded lingual retainers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35251180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1707520
work_keys_str_mv AT golshahamin bondstrengthanddeflectionoffourtypesofbondedlingualretainers
AT feylishirinasadian bondstrengthanddeflectionoffourtypesofbondedlingualretainers