Cargando…
Quantitative Validation of the Coronary Angioscopic Yellow Plaque with Lipid Core Burden Index Assessed by Intracoronary Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Aim: We aimed to validate the subjective and qualitative angioscopic findings by the objective and quantitative near-infrared spectroscopic (NIRS) assessment to compensate each other’s drawbacks. Methods: This is a single-center prospective observational study. Patients undergoing a planned follow-u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.60566 |
Sumario: | Aim: We aimed to validate the subjective and qualitative angioscopic findings by the objective and quantitative near-infrared spectroscopic (NIRS) assessment to compensate each other’s drawbacks. Methods: This is a single-center prospective observational study. Patients undergoing a planned follow-up coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled from January 2018 to April 2019. The major three vessels were examined by NIRS-intravascular ultrasound, followed by coronary angioscopic evaluation. Yellow color grade on angioscopy was classified into four grades (0, white; 1, slight yellow; 2, yellow; and 3, intensive yellow) at a location of maximal lipid core burden index over 4 mm [LCBI (4)] on NIRS in each vessel. Results: A total of 95 lesions in 44 patients (72.6±6.7 years, 75% male) were analyzed. LCBI (4) was significantly different among different yellow color grades by coronary angioscopy (ANOVA, p <0.001). Positive correlation was found between angioscopic yellow color grade and LCBI (4) (beta coefficient 164.8, 95% confidence interval 122.9–206.7; p <0.001). The best cutoff value of LCBI (4) to predict the presence of yellow plaque (yellow color grade ≥ 2) was 448 (sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 69.7%, C-statistic 0.800, 95% confidence interval 0.713–0.887, p <0.001). Conclusion: The qualitative angioscopic assessment was objectively validated by the quantitative NIRS evaluation, which would be helpful for the reinterpretation of the existing evidences of both imaging modalities. |
---|