Cargando…
Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and B
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant diversion of human and material resources to COVID-19 diagnostics, to the extent that influenza viruses and co-infection in COVID-19 patients remains undocumented and pose serious public-health consequences. We optimized and validated a highly sensit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07152-0 |
_version_ | 1784662650256359424 |
---|---|
author | Sahajpal, Nikhil S. Mondal, Ashis K. Ananth, Sudha Njau, Allan Jones, Kimya Ahluwalia, Pankaj Oza, Eesha Ross, Ted M. Kota, Vamsi Kothandaraman, Arvind Fulzele, Sadanand Hegde, Madhuri Chaubey, Alka Rojiani, Amyn M. Kolhe, Ravindra |
author_facet | Sahajpal, Nikhil S. Mondal, Ashis K. Ananth, Sudha Njau, Allan Jones, Kimya Ahluwalia, Pankaj Oza, Eesha Ross, Ted M. Kota, Vamsi Kothandaraman, Arvind Fulzele, Sadanand Hegde, Madhuri Chaubey, Alka Rojiani, Amyn M. Kolhe, Ravindra |
author_sort | Sahajpal, Nikhil S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant diversion of human and material resources to COVID-19 diagnostics, to the extent that influenza viruses and co-infection in COVID-19 patients remains undocumented and pose serious public-health consequences. We optimized and validated a highly sensitive RT-PCR based multiplex-assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B viruses in a single-test. This study evaluated clinical specimens (n = 1411), 1019 saliva and 392 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), tested using two-assays: FDA-EUA approved SARS-CoV-2 assay that targets N and ORF1ab gene, and the PKamp-RT-PCR based assay that targets SARS-CoV-2, influenza viruses A and B. Of the 1019 saliva samples, 17.0% (174/1019) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using either assay. The detection rate for SARS-CoV-2 was higher with the multiplex assay compared to SARS-specific assay [91.9% (160/174) vs. 87.9% (153/174)], respectively. Of the 392 NPS samples, 10.4% (41/392) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using either assay. The detection rate for SARS-CoV-2 was higher with the multiplex assay compared to SARS-specific assay [97.5% (40/41) vs. 92.1% (39/41)], respectively. This study presents clinical validation of a multiplex-PCR assay for testing SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B viruses, using NPS and saliva samples, and demonstrates the feasibility of implementing the assay without disrupting the existing laboratory workflow. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8894395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88943952022-03-07 Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and B Sahajpal, Nikhil S. Mondal, Ashis K. Ananth, Sudha Njau, Allan Jones, Kimya Ahluwalia, Pankaj Oza, Eesha Ross, Ted M. Kota, Vamsi Kothandaraman, Arvind Fulzele, Sadanand Hegde, Madhuri Chaubey, Alka Rojiani, Amyn M. Kolhe, Ravindra Sci Rep Article The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant diversion of human and material resources to COVID-19 diagnostics, to the extent that influenza viruses and co-infection in COVID-19 patients remains undocumented and pose serious public-health consequences. We optimized and validated a highly sensitive RT-PCR based multiplex-assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B viruses in a single-test. This study evaluated clinical specimens (n = 1411), 1019 saliva and 392 nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), tested using two-assays: FDA-EUA approved SARS-CoV-2 assay that targets N and ORF1ab gene, and the PKamp-RT-PCR based assay that targets SARS-CoV-2, influenza viruses A and B. Of the 1019 saliva samples, 17.0% (174/1019) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using either assay. The detection rate for SARS-CoV-2 was higher with the multiplex assay compared to SARS-specific assay [91.9% (160/174) vs. 87.9% (153/174)], respectively. Of the 392 NPS samples, 10.4% (41/392) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using either assay. The detection rate for SARS-CoV-2 was higher with the multiplex assay compared to SARS-specific assay [97.5% (40/41) vs. 92.1% (39/41)], respectively. This study presents clinical validation of a multiplex-PCR assay for testing SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B viruses, using NPS and saliva samples, and demonstrates the feasibility of implementing the assay without disrupting the existing laboratory workflow. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8894395/ /pubmed/35241679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07152-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sahajpal, Nikhil S. Mondal, Ashis K. Ananth, Sudha Njau, Allan Jones, Kimya Ahluwalia, Pankaj Oza, Eesha Ross, Ted M. Kota, Vamsi Kothandaraman, Arvind Fulzele, Sadanand Hegde, Madhuri Chaubey, Alka Rojiani, Amyn M. Kolhe, Ravindra Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and B |
title | Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and B |
title_full | Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and B |
title_fullStr | Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and B |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and B |
title_short | Clinical validation of a multiplex PCR-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-Cov-2, influenza A and B |
title_sort | clinical validation of a multiplex pcr-based detection assay using saliva or nasopharyngeal samples for sars-cov-2, influenza a and b |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07152-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahajpalnikhils clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT mondalashisk clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT ananthsudha clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT njauallan clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT joneskimya clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT ahluwaliapankaj clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT ozaeesha clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT rosstedm clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT kotavamsi clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT kothandaramanarvind clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT fulzelesadanand clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT hegdemadhuri clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT chaubeyalka clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT rojianiamynm clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb AT kolheravindra clinicalvalidationofamultiplexpcrbaseddetectionassayusingsalivaornasopharyngealsamplesforsarscov2influenzaaandb |