Cargando…
Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review
Accurate and objective performance assessment is essential for both trainees and certified surgeons. However, existing methods can be time consuming, labor intensive, and subject to bias. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to provide rapid, automated, and reproducible feedback without the need...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00566-0 |
_version_ | 1784662673450860544 |
---|---|
author | Lam, Kyle Chen, Junhong Wang, Zeyu Iqbal, Fahad M. Darzi, Ara Lo, Benny Purkayastha, Sanjay Kinross, James M. |
author_facet | Lam, Kyle Chen, Junhong Wang, Zeyu Iqbal, Fahad M. Darzi, Ara Lo, Benny Purkayastha, Sanjay Kinross, James M. |
author_sort | Lam, Kyle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate and objective performance assessment is essential for both trainees and certified surgeons. However, existing methods can be time consuming, labor intensive, and subject to bias. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to provide rapid, automated, and reproducible feedback without the need for expert reviewers. We aimed to systematically review the literature and determine the ML techniques used for technical surgical skill assessment and identify challenges and barriers in the field. A systematic literature search, in accordance with the PRISMA statement, was performed to identify studies detailing the use of ML for technical skill assessment in surgery. Of the 1896 studies that were retrieved, 66 studies were included. The most common ML methods used were Hidden Markov Models (HMM, 14/66), Support Vector Machines (SVM, 17/66), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN, 17/66). 40/66 studies used kinematic data, 19/66 used video or image data, and 7/66 used both. Studies assessed the performance of benchtop tasks (48/66), simulator tasks (10/66), and real-life surgery (8/66). Accuracy rates of over 80% were achieved, although tasks and participants varied between studies. Barriers to progress in the field included a focus on basic tasks, lack of standardization between studies, and lack of datasets. ML has the potential to produce accurate and objective surgical skill assessment through the use of methods including HMM, SVM, and ANN. Future ML-based assessment tools should move beyond the assessment of basic tasks and towards real-life surgery and provide interpretable feedback with clinical value for the surgeon. PROSPERO: CRD42020226071 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8894462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88944622022-03-08 Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review Lam, Kyle Chen, Junhong Wang, Zeyu Iqbal, Fahad M. Darzi, Ara Lo, Benny Purkayastha, Sanjay Kinross, James M. NPJ Digit Med Review Article Accurate and objective performance assessment is essential for both trainees and certified surgeons. However, existing methods can be time consuming, labor intensive, and subject to bias. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to provide rapid, automated, and reproducible feedback without the need for expert reviewers. We aimed to systematically review the literature and determine the ML techniques used for technical surgical skill assessment and identify challenges and barriers in the field. A systematic literature search, in accordance with the PRISMA statement, was performed to identify studies detailing the use of ML for technical skill assessment in surgery. Of the 1896 studies that were retrieved, 66 studies were included. The most common ML methods used were Hidden Markov Models (HMM, 14/66), Support Vector Machines (SVM, 17/66), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN, 17/66). 40/66 studies used kinematic data, 19/66 used video or image data, and 7/66 used both. Studies assessed the performance of benchtop tasks (48/66), simulator tasks (10/66), and real-life surgery (8/66). Accuracy rates of over 80% were achieved, although tasks and participants varied between studies. Barriers to progress in the field included a focus on basic tasks, lack of standardization between studies, and lack of datasets. ML has the potential to produce accurate and objective surgical skill assessment through the use of methods including HMM, SVM, and ANN. Future ML-based assessment tools should move beyond the assessment of basic tasks and towards real-life surgery and provide interpretable feedback with clinical value for the surgeon. PROSPERO: CRD42020226071 Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8894462/ /pubmed/35241760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00566-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Lam, Kyle Chen, Junhong Wang, Zeyu Iqbal, Fahad M. Darzi, Ara Lo, Benny Purkayastha, Sanjay Kinross, James M. Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review |
title | Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review |
title_full | Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review |
title_short | Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review |
title_sort | machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00566-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamkyle machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview AT chenjunhong machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview AT wangzeyu machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview AT iqbalfahadm machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview AT darziara machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview AT lobenny machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview AT purkayasthasanjay machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview AT kinrossjamesm machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview |