Cargando…

Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review

Accurate and objective performance assessment is essential for both trainees and certified surgeons. However, existing methods can be time consuming, labor intensive, and subject to bias. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to provide rapid, automated, and reproducible feedback without the need...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lam, Kyle, Chen, Junhong, Wang, Zeyu, Iqbal, Fahad M., Darzi, Ara, Lo, Benny, Purkayastha, Sanjay, Kinross, James M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00566-0
_version_ 1784662673450860544
author Lam, Kyle
Chen, Junhong
Wang, Zeyu
Iqbal, Fahad M.
Darzi, Ara
Lo, Benny
Purkayastha, Sanjay
Kinross, James M.
author_facet Lam, Kyle
Chen, Junhong
Wang, Zeyu
Iqbal, Fahad M.
Darzi, Ara
Lo, Benny
Purkayastha, Sanjay
Kinross, James M.
author_sort Lam, Kyle
collection PubMed
description Accurate and objective performance assessment is essential for both trainees and certified surgeons. However, existing methods can be time consuming, labor intensive, and subject to bias. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to provide rapid, automated, and reproducible feedback without the need for expert reviewers. We aimed to systematically review the literature and determine the ML techniques used for technical surgical skill assessment and identify challenges and barriers in the field. A systematic literature search, in accordance with the PRISMA statement, was performed to identify studies detailing the use of ML for technical skill assessment in surgery. Of the 1896 studies that were retrieved, 66 studies were included. The most common ML methods used were Hidden Markov Models (HMM, 14/66), Support Vector Machines (SVM, 17/66), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN, 17/66). 40/66 studies used kinematic data, 19/66 used video or image data, and 7/66 used both. Studies assessed the performance of benchtop tasks (48/66), simulator tasks (10/66), and real-life surgery (8/66). Accuracy rates of over 80% were achieved, although tasks and participants varied between studies. Barriers to progress in the field included a focus on basic tasks, lack of standardization between studies, and lack of datasets. ML has the potential to produce accurate and objective surgical skill assessment through the use of methods including HMM, SVM, and ANN. Future ML-based assessment tools should move beyond the assessment of basic tasks and towards real-life surgery and provide interpretable feedback with clinical value for the surgeon. PROSPERO: CRD42020226071
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8894462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88944622022-03-08 Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review Lam, Kyle Chen, Junhong Wang, Zeyu Iqbal, Fahad M. Darzi, Ara Lo, Benny Purkayastha, Sanjay Kinross, James M. NPJ Digit Med Review Article Accurate and objective performance assessment is essential for both trainees and certified surgeons. However, existing methods can be time consuming, labor intensive, and subject to bias. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to provide rapid, automated, and reproducible feedback without the need for expert reviewers. We aimed to systematically review the literature and determine the ML techniques used for technical surgical skill assessment and identify challenges and barriers in the field. A systematic literature search, in accordance with the PRISMA statement, was performed to identify studies detailing the use of ML for technical skill assessment in surgery. Of the 1896 studies that were retrieved, 66 studies were included. The most common ML methods used were Hidden Markov Models (HMM, 14/66), Support Vector Machines (SVM, 17/66), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN, 17/66). 40/66 studies used kinematic data, 19/66 used video or image data, and 7/66 used both. Studies assessed the performance of benchtop tasks (48/66), simulator tasks (10/66), and real-life surgery (8/66). Accuracy rates of over 80% were achieved, although tasks and participants varied between studies. Barriers to progress in the field included a focus on basic tasks, lack of standardization between studies, and lack of datasets. ML has the potential to produce accurate and objective surgical skill assessment through the use of methods including HMM, SVM, and ANN. Future ML-based assessment tools should move beyond the assessment of basic tasks and towards real-life surgery and provide interpretable feedback with clinical value for the surgeon. PROSPERO: CRD42020226071 Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8894462/ /pubmed/35241760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00566-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Lam, Kyle
Chen, Junhong
Wang, Zeyu
Iqbal, Fahad M.
Darzi, Ara
Lo, Benny
Purkayastha, Sanjay
Kinross, James M.
Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review
title Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review
title_full Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review
title_fullStr Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review
title_short Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review
title_sort machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00566-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lamkyle machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview
AT chenjunhong machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview
AT wangzeyu machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview
AT iqbalfahadm machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview
AT darziara machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview
AT lobenny machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview
AT purkayasthasanjay machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview
AT kinrossjamesm machinelearningfortechnicalskillassessmentinsurgeryasystematicreview