Cargando…

Characterization of m6A regulator‐mediated methylation modification patterns and tumor microenvironment infiltration in acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have confirmed the existence of epigenetic regulation of immune responses in acute myeloid leukemia. However, the potential role of RNA N6‐methyladenosine (m6A) remodeling in tumor microenvironment (TME) infiltration remains unclear. METHODS AND MATERIALS: m6A patterns o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Shiyu, Qi, Jiaqian, Fang, Kun, Wang, Hong, Tang, Yaqiong, Wu, Depei, Han, Yue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4531
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previous studies have confirmed the existence of epigenetic regulation of immune responses in acute myeloid leukemia. However, the potential role of RNA N6‐methyladenosine (m6A) remodeling in tumor microenvironment (TME) infiltration remains unclear. METHODS AND MATERIALS: m6A patterns of 469 AML patients (420 of which provided survival data) based on 18 m6A regulators were systematically evaluated. Based on the expression of 18 m6A regulators, unsupervised agglomerative cluster analysis was applied to recognize the various m6A modification types and to classify patients. We linked these patterns to TME infiltration characteristics and identified three distinct populations of m6A modifications. RESULTS: These three TME cell infiltration patterns are characterized by a high degree of concordance with the three tumor immunophenotypes, which include immunoinflammatory, immunorejection, and immune inert patterns. We showed that assessment of m6A modification patterns within individually neoplasms can forecast the stage of neoplasmic inflammation, TME basal activity, subtype, hereditary mutation, and clinical patient prognosis. Limited low m6Ascore, featuring increased mutational load and immune activation, indicates an inflammatory phenotype of TME with a 5‐year survival rate at 14.4% compared to the high‐m6Ascore group (40.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Data from two different cohorts demonstrated that a higher m6Ascore showed a marked therapeutic superiority as well as clinical advantage. Assessing m6A modification patterns in AML patients could improve our knowledge of the TME infiltrative profile as well as directing effective immunotherapeutic approaches.