Cargando…

What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis

INTRODUCTION: Allocation of research funds relies on peer review to support funding decisions, and these processes can be susceptible to biases and inefficiencies. The aim of this work was to determine which past interventions to peer review and decision-making have worked to improve research fundin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra, Crane, Ksenia, Meadmore, Katie, Fackrell, Kathryn, Church, Hazel, Fraser, Simon, Blatch-Jones, Amanda
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2022
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00120-2

Ejemplares similares

An in-depth exploration of researcher experiences of time and effort involved in health and social care research funding in the UK: The need for changes
por: Meadmore, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Decision-making approaches used by UK and international health funding organisations for allocating research funds: A survey of current practice
por: Meadmore, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives
por: Fackrell, Kathryn, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The post-award effort of managing and reporting on funded research: a scoping review
por: Crane, Ksenia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Researchers’ perspective of real-world impact from UK public health research: A qualitative study
por: Lakin, Kay, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review
por: Blatch-Jones, Amanda Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis
por: Radcliffe, Eloise, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making
por: Bendiscioli, Sandra
Publicado: (2019)

Peer-to-peer lending and bias in crowd decision-making
por: Singh, Pramesh, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Optimal decision making with biologically realistic neural signals
por: Caballero, Javier A, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review
por: Zhao, Junqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What are the mechanisms that support healthcare professionals to adopt assisted decision-making practice? A rapid realist review
por: Davies, Carmel, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Community mental health funding, stakeholder engagement and outcomes: a realist synthesis
por: Duncan, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Influence of external peer reviewer scores for funding applications on funding board decisions: a retrospective analysis of 1561 reviews
por: Sorrell, Lexy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

What is known about what works in community-involved decision-making relating to urban green and blue spaces? A realist review protocol
por: Rahtz, Emmylou, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions
por: Sato, Sayaka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Engaging Older Adults in Health Care Decision-Making: A Realist Synthesis
por: Elliott, Jacobi, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis
por: Waldron, Tamara, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: what makes peer-learning tick?
por: Clark, Ian, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist review protocol
por: Groot, Gary, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Trust and world view in shared decision making with indigenous patients: A realist synthesis
por: Groot, Gary, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding
por: Roebber, Paul J., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

peer review of grant funding – the Australian perspective
por: Cappai, Roberto
Publicado: (2015)

Grow your investments with the best mutual funds and ETFs: making long-term investment decisions with the best funds today
por: Mckee, Stephen L
Publicado: (2015)

The Influence of Social Comparison and Peer Group Size on Risky Decision-Making
por: Wang, Dawei, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Information about peer choices shapes human risky decision-making
por: Tomova, Livia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making
por: Yu, Hongbo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Peer support and shared decision making in Open Dialogue: Opportunities and recommendations
por: Chmielowska, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review
por: Woudstra, Anke Judith, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

‘Clinically unnecessary’ use of emergency and urgent care: A realist review of patients' decision making
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Genomics: what is realistically achievable?
por: Overbeek, Ross
Publicado: (2000)

What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
por: Broome, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What works for whom in pharmacist-led smoking cessation support: realist review
por: Greenhalgh, Trisha, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Imitating the Risky Decision-Making of Peers: An Experimental Study Among Emerging Adults
por: Riedijk, Larisa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Focusing a realist evaluation of peer support for paediatric mental health
por: Thompson, Dean M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evidence for risk extrapolation in decision making by tadpoles
por: Crane, Adam L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

What makes an effective grants peer reviewer? An exploratory study of the necessary skills
por: Steiner Davis, Miriam L. E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis
por: Bunn, Frances, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Efficiency over thoroughness in laboratory testing decision making in primary care: findings from a realist review
por: Duddy, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Information Quality in Regulatory Decision Making: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice
por: McCarty, Lynn S., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_omoc8447r35uoeavqg2qhq886p