Cargando…

The 21st Century Cures Act and Multiuser Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release

Although the Office of The National Coordinator for Health Information Technology’s (ONC) Information Blocking Provision in the Cures Act Final Rule is an important step forward in providing patients free and unfettered access to their electronic health information (EHI), in the contexts of multiuse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arvisais-Anhalt, Simone, Lau, May, Lehmann, Christoph U, Holmgren, A Jay, Medford, Richard J, Ramirez, Charina M, Chen, Clifford N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35175207
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34085
_version_ 1784662889749020672
author Arvisais-Anhalt, Simone
Lau, May
Lehmann, Christoph U
Holmgren, A Jay
Medford, Richard J
Ramirez, Charina M
Chen, Clifford N
author_facet Arvisais-Anhalt, Simone
Lau, May
Lehmann, Christoph U
Holmgren, A Jay
Medford, Richard J
Ramirez, Charina M
Chen, Clifford N
author_sort Arvisais-Anhalt, Simone
collection PubMed
description Although the Office of The National Coordinator for Health Information Technology’s (ONC) Information Blocking Provision in the Cures Act Final Rule is an important step forward in providing patients free and unfettered access to their electronic health information (EHI), in the contexts of multiuser electronic health record (EHR) access and proxy access, concerns on the potential for harm in adolescent care contexts exist. We describe how the provision could erode patients’ (both adolescent and older patients alike) trust and willingness to seek care. The rule’s preventing harm exception does not apply to situations where the patient is a minor and the health care provider wishes to restrict a parent’s or guardian’s access to the minor’s EHI to avoid violating the minor’s confidentiality and potentially harming patient-clinician trust. This may violate previously developed government principles in the design and implementation of EHRs for pediatric care. Creating legally acceptable workarounds by means such as duplicate “shadow charting” will be burdensome (and prohibitive) for health care providers. Under the privacy exception, patients have the opportunity to request information to not be shared; however, depending on institutional practices, providers and patients may have limited awareness of this exception. Notably, the privacy exception states that providers cannot “improperly encourage or induce a patient’s request to block information.” Fearing being found in violation of the information blocking provisions, providers may feel that they are unable to guide patients navigating the release of their EHI in the multiuser or proxy access setting. ONC should provide more detailed guidance on their website and targeted outreach to providers and their specialty organizations that care for adolescents and other individuals affected by the Cures Act, and researchers should carefully monitor charting habits in these multiuser or proxy access situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8895284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88952842022-03-10 The 21st Century Cures Act and Multiuser Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release Arvisais-Anhalt, Simone Lau, May Lehmann, Christoph U Holmgren, A Jay Medford, Richard J Ramirez, Charina M Chen, Clifford N J Med Internet Res Viewpoint Although the Office of The National Coordinator for Health Information Technology’s (ONC) Information Blocking Provision in the Cures Act Final Rule is an important step forward in providing patients free and unfettered access to their electronic health information (EHI), in the contexts of multiuser electronic health record (EHR) access and proxy access, concerns on the potential for harm in adolescent care contexts exist. We describe how the provision could erode patients’ (both adolescent and older patients alike) trust and willingness to seek care. The rule’s preventing harm exception does not apply to situations where the patient is a minor and the health care provider wishes to restrict a parent’s or guardian’s access to the minor’s EHI to avoid violating the minor’s confidentiality and potentially harming patient-clinician trust. This may violate previously developed government principles in the design and implementation of EHRs for pediatric care. Creating legally acceptable workarounds by means such as duplicate “shadow charting” will be burdensome (and prohibitive) for health care providers. Under the privacy exception, patients have the opportunity to request information to not be shared; however, depending on institutional practices, providers and patients may have limited awareness of this exception. Notably, the privacy exception states that providers cannot “improperly encourage or induce a patient’s request to block information.” Fearing being found in violation of the information blocking provisions, providers may feel that they are unable to guide patients navigating the release of their EHI in the multiuser or proxy access setting. ONC should provide more detailed guidance on their website and targeted outreach to providers and their specialty organizations that care for adolescents and other individuals affected by the Cures Act, and researchers should carefully monitor charting habits in these multiuser or proxy access situations. JMIR Publications 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8895284/ /pubmed/35175207 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34085 Text en ©Simone Arvisais-Anhalt, May Lau, Christoph U Lehmann, A Jay Holmgren, Richard J Medford, Charina M Ramirez, Clifford N Chen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 17.02.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Arvisais-Anhalt, Simone
Lau, May
Lehmann, Christoph U
Holmgren, A Jay
Medford, Richard J
Ramirez, Charina M
Chen, Clifford N
The 21st Century Cures Act and Multiuser Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release
title The 21st Century Cures Act and Multiuser Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release
title_full The 21st Century Cures Act and Multiuser Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release
title_fullStr The 21st Century Cures Act and Multiuser Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release
title_full_unstemmed The 21st Century Cures Act and Multiuser Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release
title_short The 21st Century Cures Act and Multiuser Electronic Health Record Access: Potential Pitfalls of Information Release
title_sort 21st century cures act and multiuser electronic health record access: potential pitfalls of information release
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35175207
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34085
work_keys_str_mv AT arvisaisanhaltsimone the21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT laumay the21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT lehmannchristophu the21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT holmgrenajay the21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT medfordrichardj the21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT ramirezcharinam the21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT chencliffordn the21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT arvisaisanhaltsimone 21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT laumay 21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT lehmannchristophu 21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT holmgrenajay 21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT medfordrichardj 21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT ramirezcharinam 21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease
AT chencliffordn 21stcenturycuresactandmultiuserelectronichealthrecordaccesspotentialpitfallsofinformationrelease