Cargando…

Electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in Chinese newspapers

INTRODUCTION: While debates on e-cigarettes are mainly conducted in scientific fora, media are the most accessible information source for the public, shaping their perceptions of health issues. This study is the first to examine e-cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments presented in Chin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyu, Joanne Chen, Huang, Peiyi, Ling, Pamela M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35342381
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/145929
_version_ 1784662934019899392
author Lyu, Joanne Chen
Huang, Peiyi
Ling, Pamela M.
author_facet Lyu, Joanne Chen
Huang, Peiyi
Ling, Pamela M.
author_sort Lyu, Joanne Chen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While debates on e-cigarettes are mainly conducted in scientific fora, media are the most accessible information source for the public, shaping their perceptions of health issues. This study is the first to examine e-cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments presented in Chinese newspapers. METHODS: The Chinese terms for ‘e-cigarettes’ were searched in a widely used Chinese news database Wisenews. Content analysis of the full text of 639 news articles was conducted to identify topics with conflicting arguments and examine whether the dominant argument in each topic changed across four time periods from 2004 to 2019. RESULTS: Twelve e-cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments were identified. The most frequently reported topic was health impact of e-cigarettes, followed by impact of secondhand aerosol exposure, smoking cessation, relative health impact of e-cigarettes compared to cigarettes, and e-cigarette policies outside China. At the same time, the price was the least frequently reported topic. Overall, negative arguments outnumbered positive arguments in the study period. The dominant arguments within many topics changed across time periods; however, within the topics of relative health impact of e-cigarettes compared to cigarettes, taste/flavor, and economic prospects of the industry, positive arguments were more frequently reported in almost all periods. Within the topics of addiction, policies in China, and policies outside China, negative arguments were more frequently reported in virtually all periods. CONCLUSIONS: Though overall the dominant argument about e-cigarettes and health was ‘e-cigarettes are harmful’, in the early time periods, e-cigarettes were reported as ‘harmless’ or even ‘healthy’. As China began to regulate e-cigarettes, the reporting on e-cigarettes more frequently included the ‘e-cigarettes are harmful’ argument. The consistent, more frequent reporting of ‘good e-cigarette taste/flavor’ has the potential to attract young people to e-cigarette products. The increased reporting on policies unfavorable to e-cigarettes aligned with the growing number of regulations restricting e-cigarettes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8895478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88954782022-03-24 Electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in Chinese newspapers Lyu, Joanne Chen Huang, Peiyi Ling, Pamela M. Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: While debates on e-cigarettes are mainly conducted in scientific fora, media are the most accessible information source for the public, shaping their perceptions of health issues. This study is the first to examine e-cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments presented in Chinese newspapers. METHODS: The Chinese terms for ‘e-cigarettes’ were searched in a widely used Chinese news database Wisenews. Content analysis of the full text of 639 news articles was conducted to identify topics with conflicting arguments and examine whether the dominant argument in each topic changed across four time periods from 2004 to 2019. RESULTS: Twelve e-cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments were identified. The most frequently reported topic was health impact of e-cigarettes, followed by impact of secondhand aerosol exposure, smoking cessation, relative health impact of e-cigarettes compared to cigarettes, and e-cigarette policies outside China. At the same time, the price was the least frequently reported topic. Overall, negative arguments outnumbered positive arguments in the study period. The dominant arguments within many topics changed across time periods; however, within the topics of relative health impact of e-cigarettes compared to cigarettes, taste/flavor, and economic prospects of the industry, positive arguments were more frequently reported in almost all periods. Within the topics of addiction, policies in China, and policies outside China, negative arguments were more frequently reported in virtually all periods. CONCLUSIONS: Though overall the dominant argument about e-cigarettes and health was ‘e-cigarettes are harmful’, in the early time periods, e-cigarettes were reported as ‘harmless’ or even ‘healthy’. As China began to regulate e-cigarettes, the reporting on e-cigarettes more frequently included the ‘e-cigarettes are harmful’ argument. The consistent, more frequent reporting of ‘good e-cigarette taste/flavor’ has the potential to attract young people to e-cigarette products. The increased reporting on policies unfavorable to e-cigarettes aligned with the growing number of regulations restricting e-cigarettes. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8895478/ /pubmed/35342381 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/145929 Text en © 2022 Lyu J.C. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Lyu, Joanne Chen
Huang, Peiyi
Ling, Pamela M.
Electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in Chinese newspapers
title Electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in Chinese newspapers
title_full Electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in Chinese newspapers
title_fullStr Electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in Chinese newspapers
title_full_unstemmed Electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in Chinese newspapers
title_short Electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in Chinese newspapers
title_sort electronic cigarette related topics with conflicting arguments in chinese newspapers
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35342381
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/145929
work_keys_str_mv AT lyujoannechen electroniccigaretterelatedtopicswithconflictingargumentsinchinesenewspapers
AT huangpeiyi electroniccigaretterelatedtopicswithconflictingargumentsinchinesenewspapers
AT lingpamelam electroniccigaretterelatedtopicswithconflictingargumentsinchinesenewspapers