Cargando…

Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) provides a source for transplant in the setting of the deceased donor organ shortage. Seeing as living donors do not derive any medical benefit from the procedure, fully understanding the impact of donation on donor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thuluvath, Avesh J., Peipert, John, Berkowitz, Rachel, Siddiqui, Osama, Whitehead, Bridget, Thomas, Arielle, Levitsky, Josh, Caicedo-Ramirez, Juan, Ladner, Daniela P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252845
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/dmr-20-151
_version_ 1784662935143972864
author Thuluvath, Avesh J.
Peipert, John
Berkowitz, Rachel
Siddiqui, Osama
Whitehead, Bridget
Thomas, Arielle
Levitsky, Josh
Caicedo-Ramirez, Juan
Ladner, Daniela P.
author_facet Thuluvath, Avesh J.
Peipert, John
Berkowitz, Rachel
Siddiqui, Osama
Whitehead, Bridget
Thomas, Arielle
Levitsky, Josh
Caicedo-Ramirez, Juan
Ladner, Daniela P.
author_sort Thuluvath, Avesh J.
collection PubMed
description Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) provides a source for transplant in the setting of the deceased donor organ shortage. Seeing as living donors do not derive any medical benefit from the procedure, fully understanding the impact of donation on donor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is essential. A systematic search of the MEDLINE database was performed from 2008–2020, using relevant Medical Subject Headings. Articles were evaluated for study design, cohort size and follow-up time and excluded if they contained significant methodological flaws. A total of 43 articles were included: 20 (47%) were cross-sectional and 23 (53%) were longitudinal. The mean number of donors per study was 142 (range:8–578) with follow-up ranging from 12–132 months. Forty-two unique HRQOL metrics were implemented across the 43 studies, the majority of which were questionnaires. Of the 31 studies that used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 questionnaire, 9.1% of donors reported physical QOL did not return to pre-LDLT levels for at least 2 years after donation. Mental QOL remained stable or improved after LDLT, with mean mental composite scores increasing from 50 to 52 at 3 months post-LDLT in one study. The predicted probability of poor sexual desire decreased at 1-year post-LDLT (male: 0.08, female: 0.26) relative to pre-LDLT (male: 0.44, female: 0.76; P<0.001) and three months post-LDLT (male: 0.35, female 0.69; P=0.001). Forty percent of donors found LDLT to be financially burdensome at 3 months and 19% at 2 years post-LDLT. Female gender and obesity were consistent predictors of worse HRQOL. Laparoscopy-assisted donor hepatectomy was associated with shorter hospitalizations than open donor hepatectomy (10.3 vs. 18.3 days, P=0.02). No studies used the National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of HRQOL. Our review demonstrates that LDLT can have a long-lasting negative impact on physical QOL in 9.1% of donors and can cause both sexual dysfunction and significant financial strain. Future studies should consider using standardized and extensively validated patient reported outcomes measures, such as PROMIS, in order to directly compare outcomes across studies and gain further insight into the impact of LDLT on D-HRQOL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8895483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88954832022-03-04 Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature Thuluvath, Avesh J. Peipert, John Berkowitz, Rachel Siddiqui, Osama Whitehead, Bridget Thomas, Arielle Levitsky, Josh Caicedo-Ramirez, Juan Ladner, Daniela P. Dig Med Res Article Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) provides a source for transplant in the setting of the deceased donor organ shortage. Seeing as living donors do not derive any medical benefit from the procedure, fully understanding the impact of donation on donor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is essential. A systematic search of the MEDLINE database was performed from 2008–2020, using relevant Medical Subject Headings. Articles were evaluated for study design, cohort size and follow-up time and excluded if they contained significant methodological flaws. A total of 43 articles were included: 20 (47%) were cross-sectional and 23 (53%) were longitudinal. The mean number of donors per study was 142 (range:8–578) with follow-up ranging from 12–132 months. Forty-two unique HRQOL metrics were implemented across the 43 studies, the majority of which were questionnaires. Of the 31 studies that used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 questionnaire, 9.1% of donors reported physical QOL did not return to pre-LDLT levels for at least 2 years after donation. Mental QOL remained stable or improved after LDLT, with mean mental composite scores increasing from 50 to 52 at 3 months post-LDLT in one study. The predicted probability of poor sexual desire decreased at 1-year post-LDLT (male: 0.08, female: 0.26) relative to pre-LDLT (male: 0.44, female: 0.76; P<0.001) and three months post-LDLT (male: 0.35, female 0.69; P=0.001). Forty percent of donors found LDLT to be financially burdensome at 3 months and 19% at 2 years post-LDLT. Female gender and obesity were consistent predictors of worse HRQOL. Laparoscopy-assisted donor hepatectomy was associated with shorter hospitalizations than open donor hepatectomy (10.3 vs. 18.3 days, P=0.02). No studies used the National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of HRQOL. Our review demonstrates that LDLT can have a long-lasting negative impact on physical QOL in 9.1% of donors and can cause both sexual dysfunction and significant financial strain. Future studies should consider using standardized and extensively validated patient reported outcomes measures, such as PROMIS, in order to directly compare outcomes across studies and gain further insight into the impact of LDLT on D-HRQOL. 2021-09 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8895483/ /pubmed/35252845 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/dmr-20-151 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the noncommercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Thuluvath, Avesh J.
Peipert, John
Berkowitz, Rachel
Siddiqui, Osama
Whitehead, Bridget
Thomas, Arielle
Levitsky, Josh
Caicedo-Ramirez, Juan
Ladner, Daniela P.
Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature
title Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature
title_full Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature
title_fullStr Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature
title_short Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature
title_sort donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252845
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/dmr-20-151
work_keys_str_mv AT thuluvathaveshj donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature
AT peipertjohn donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature
AT berkowitzrachel donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature
AT siddiquiosama donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature
AT whiteheadbridget donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature
AT thomasarielle donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature
AT levitskyjosh donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature
AT caicedoramirezjuan donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature
AT ladnerdanielap donorqualityoflifeafterlivingdonorlivertransplantationareviewoftheliterature