Cargando…

Informing the development of Australia’s National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy: a rapid review methodology

BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (EDs) are highly complex mental illnesses associated with significant medical complications. There are currently knowledge gaps in research relating to the epidemiology, aetiology, treatment, burden, and outcomes of eating disorders. To clearly identify and begin address...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aouad, Phillip, Bryant, Emma, Maloney, Danielle, Marks, Peta, Le, Anvi, Russell, Haley, Hay, Phillipa, Miskovic-Wheatley, Jane, Touyz, Stephen, Maguire, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00556-3
_version_ 1784662943348031488
author Aouad, Phillip
Bryant, Emma
Maloney, Danielle
Marks, Peta
Le, Anvi
Russell, Haley
Hay, Phillipa
Miskovic-Wheatley, Jane
Touyz, Stephen
Maguire, Sarah
author_facet Aouad, Phillip
Bryant, Emma
Maloney, Danielle
Marks, Peta
Le, Anvi
Russell, Haley
Hay, Phillipa
Miskovic-Wheatley, Jane
Touyz, Stephen
Maguire, Sarah
author_sort Aouad, Phillip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (EDs) are highly complex mental illnesses associated with significant medical complications. There are currently knowledge gaps in research relating to the epidemiology, aetiology, treatment, burden, and outcomes of eating disorders. To clearly identify and begin addressing the major deficits in the scientific, medical, and clinical understanding of these mental illnesses, the Australian Government Department of Health in 2019 funded the InsideOut Institute (IOI) to develop the Australian Eating Disorder Research and Translation Strategy, the primary aim of which was to identify priorities and targets for building research capacity and outputs. A series of rapid reviews (RR) were conducted to map the current state of knowledge, identify evidence gaps, and inform development of the national research strategy. Published peer-reviewed literature on DSM-5 listed EDs, across eight knowledge domains was reviewed: (1) population, prevalence, disease burden, Quality of Life in Western developed countries; (2) risk factors; (3) co-occurring conditions and medical complications; (4) screening and diagnosis; (5) prevention and early intervention; (6) psychotherapies and relapse prevention; (7) models of care; (8) pharmacotherapies, alternative and adjunctive therapies; and (9) outcomes (including mortality). While RRs are systematic in nature, they are distinct from systematic reviews in their aim to gather evidence in a timely manner to support decision-making on urgent or high-priority health concerns at the national level. RESULTS: Three medical science databases were searched as the primary source of literature for the RRs: Science Direct, PubMed and OVID (Medline). The search was completed on 31st May 2021 (spanning January 2009–May 2021). At writing, a total of 1,320 articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. CONCLUSIONS: For each RR, the evidence has been organised to review the knowledge area and identify gaps for further research and investment. The series of RRs (published separately within the current series) are designed to support the development of research and translation practice in the field of EDs. They highlight areas for investment and investigation, and provide researchers, service planners and providers, and research funders rapid access to quality current evidence, which has been synthesised and organised to assist decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8895520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88955202022-03-10 Informing the development of Australia’s National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy: a rapid review methodology Aouad, Phillip Bryant, Emma Maloney, Danielle Marks, Peta Le, Anvi Russell, Haley Hay, Phillipa Miskovic-Wheatley, Jane Touyz, Stephen Maguire, Sarah J Eat Disord Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (EDs) are highly complex mental illnesses associated with significant medical complications. There are currently knowledge gaps in research relating to the epidemiology, aetiology, treatment, burden, and outcomes of eating disorders. To clearly identify and begin addressing the major deficits in the scientific, medical, and clinical understanding of these mental illnesses, the Australian Government Department of Health in 2019 funded the InsideOut Institute (IOI) to develop the Australian Eating Disorder Research and Translation Strategy, the primary aim of which was to identify priorities and targets for building research capacity and outputs. A series of rapid reviews (RR) were conducted to map the current state of knowledge, identify evidence gaps, and inform development of the national research strategy. Published peer-reviewed literature on DSM-5 listed EDs, across eight knowledge domains was reviewed: (1) population, prevalence, disease burden, Quality of Life in Western developed countries; (2) risk factors; (3) co-occurring conditions and medical complications; (4) screening and diagnosis; (5) prevention and early intervention; (6) psychotherapies and relapse prevention; (7) models of care; (8) pharmacotherapies, alternative and adjunctive therapies; and (9) outcomes (including mortality). While RRs are systematic in nature, they are distinct from systematic reviews in their aim to gather evidence in a timely manner to support decision-making on urgent or high-priority health concerns at the national level. RESULTS: Three medical science databases were searched as the primary source of literature for the RRs: Science Direct, PubMed and OVID (Medline). The search was completed on 31st May 2021 (spanning January 2009–May 2021). At writing, a total of 1,320 articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. CONCLUSIONS: For each RR, the evidence has been organised to review the knowledge area and identify gaps for further research and investment. The series of RRs (published separately within the current series) are designed to support the development of research and translation practice in the field of EDs. They highlight areas for investment and investigation, and provide researchers, service planners and providers, and research funders rapid access to quality current evidence, which has been synthesised and organised to assist decision-making. BioMed Central 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8895520/ /pubmed/35246250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00556-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Aouad, Phillip
Bryant, Emma
Maloney, Danielle
Marks, Peta
Le, Anvi
Russell, Haley
Hay, Phillipa
Miskovic-Wheatley, Jane
Touyz, Stephen
Maguire, Sarah
Informing the development of Australia’s National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy: a rapid review methodology
title Informing the development of Australia’s National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy: a rapid review methodology
title_full Informing the development of Australia’s National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy: a rapid review methodology
title_fullStr Informing the development of Australia’s National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy: a rapid review methodology
title_full_unstemmed Informing the development of Australia’s National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy: a rapid review methodology
title_short Informing the development of Australia’s National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy: a rapid review methodology
title_sort informing the development of australia’s national eating disorders research and translation strategy: a rapid review methodology
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00556-3
work_keys_str_mv AT aouadphillip informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT bryantemma informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT maloneydanielle informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT markspeta informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT leanvi informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT russellhaley informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT hayphillipa informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT miskovicwheatleyjane informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT touyzstephen informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology
AT maguiresarah informingthedevelopmentofaustraliasnationaleatingdisordersresearchandtranslationstrategyarapidreviewmethodology