Cargando…

Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?

Through a meta-analysis, Mupepele et al. (BMC Ecol Evol 21:1–193, 2021) assessed the effects of European agroforestry systems on biodiversity, estimated by species richness or species diversity. They showed that the effects of silvoarable and silvopastoral systems depend on the systems they are comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boinot, Sébastien, Barkaoui, Karim, Mézière, Delphine, Lauri, Pierre-Eric, Sarthou, Jean-Pierre, Alignier, Audrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35240979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-01977-z
_version_ 1784663084291325952
author Boinot, Sébastien
Barkaoui, Karim
Mézière, Delphine
Lauri, Pierre-Eric
Sarthou, Jean-Pierre
Alignier, Audrey
author_facet Boinot, Sébastien
Barkaoui, Karim
Mézière, Delphine
Lauri, Pierre-Eric
Sarthou, Jean-Pierre
Alignier, Audrey
author_sort Boinot, Sébastien
collection PubMed
description Through a meta-analysis, Mupepele et al. (BMC Ecol Evol 21:1–193, 2021) assessed the effects of European agroforestry systems on biodiversity, estimated by species richness or species diversity. They showed that the effects of silvoarable and silvopastoral systems depend on the systems they are compared to and the taxa studied. Further, they found that only silvoarable systems increased species richness or diversity, compared to cropland. The authors conclude that agroforestry systems have weak effects on biodiversity and that landscape context or land-use history are probably more important than the practice of agroforestry in itself. However, we draw attention to important shortcomings in this meta-analysis, which downplay the potential of agroforestry for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes. We hope that the meta-analysis by Mupepele et al. (BMC Ecol Evol 21:1–193, 2021), and our comments, will contribute to improving the quality of research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88961132022-03-10 Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve? Boinot, Sébastien Barkaoui, Karim Mézière, Delphine Lauri, Pierre-Eric Sarthou, Jean-Pierre Alignier, Audrey BMC Ecol Evol Correspondence Through a meta-analysis, Mupepele et al. (BMC Ecol Evol 21:1–193, 2021) assessed the effects of European agroforestry systems on biodiversity, estimated by species richness or species diversity. They showed that the effects of silvoarable and silvopastoral systems depend on the systems they are compared to and the taxa studied. Further, they found that only silvoarable systems increased species richness or diversity, compared to cropland. The authors conclude that agroforestry systems have weak effects on biodiversity and that landscape context or land-use history are probably more important than the practice of agroforestry in itself. However, we draw attention to important shortcomings in this meta-analysis, which downplay the potential of agroforestry for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes. We hope that the meta-analysis by Mupepele et al. (BMC Ecol Evol 21:1–193, 2021), and our comments, will contribute to improving the quality of research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation. BioMed Central 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8896113/ /pubmed/35240979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-01977-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Boinot, Sébastien
Barkaoui, Karim
Mézière, Delphine
Lauri, Pierre-Eric
Sarthou, Jean-Pierre
Alignier, Audrey
Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?
title Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?
title_full Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?
title_fullStr Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?
title_full_unstemmed Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?
title_short Research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?
title_sort research on agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation: what can we conclude so far and what should we improve?
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35240979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-01977-z
work_keys_str_mv AT boinotsebastien researchonagroforestrysystemsandbiodiversityconservationwhatcanweconcludesofarandwhatshouldweimprove
AT barkaouikarim researchonagroforestrysystemsandbiodiversityconservationwhatcanweconcludesofarandwhatshouldweimprove
AT mezieredelphine researchonagroforestrysystemsandbiodiversityconservationwhatcanweconcludesofarandwhatshouldweimprove
AT lauripierreeric researchonagroforestrysystemsandbiodiversityconservationwhatcanweconcludesofarandwhatshouldweimprove
AT sarthoujeanpierre researchonagroforestrysystemsandbiodiversityconservationwhatcanweconcludesofarandwhatshouldweimprove
AT alignieraudrey researchonagroforestrysystemsandbiodiversityconservationwhatcanweconcludesofarandwhatshouldweimprove