Cargando…

Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An ex vivo study

BACKGROUND: Irrigation dynamics vary in optimally shaped canals. Various factors combine to create a stress-induced environment leading to a dynamic irrigant flow. AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate the irrigant flow and apical pressure using 30G open-ended needle in virtually created root can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sujith, Immadi Laxmi, Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata, Ramesh, Sindhu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282587
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_651_20
_version_ 1784663086881308672
author Sujith, Immadi Laxmi
Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata
Ramesh, Sindhu
author_facet Sujith, Immadi Laxmi
Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata
Ramesh, Sindhu
author_sort Sujith, Immadi Laxmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irrigation dynamics vary in optimally shaped canals. Various factors combine to create a stress-induced environment leading to a dynamic irrigant flow. AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate the irrigant flow and apical pressure using 30G open-ended needle in virtually created root canal model of single-rooted teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted single-rooted premolars were selected and prepared using a single rotary instrument Hyflex CM and grouped as – Group I: 30 size 0.6% taper (n = 15), Group II: 30 size 0.4% taper (n = 15), Group III: 25 size 0.6% taper (n = 15), and Group IV: 25 size 0.4% taper (n = 15). Postinstrumentation imaging was carried out using cone-beam computed tomography, and computer-aided design models were obtained. Subgrouping was done based on the nozzle position, and computational fluid dynamic analysis was carried out for the respective parameters assessed. RESULTS: Statistical significance was elicited in all the groups at different nozzle positions analyzed (P < 0.05). A post hoc test revealed significance in the mean flow rate and flow velocity in Group I at low nozzle position (P < 0.05) as compared to others. CONCLUSIONS: 30 size 0.6% tapered preparations proved efficient irrigant flow and least apical pressures at all nozzle positions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88961242022-03-10 Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An ex vivo study Sujith, Immadi Laxmi Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata Ramesh, Sindhu J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Irrigation dynamics vary in optimally shaped canals. Various factors combine to create a stress-induced environment leading to a dynamic irrigant flow. AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate the irrigant flow and apical pressure using 30G open-ended needle in virtually created root canal model of single-rooted teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted single-rooted premolars were selected and prepared using a single rotary instrument Hyflex CM and grouped as – Group I: 30 size 0.6% taper (n = 15), Group II: 30 size 0.4% taper (n = 15), Group III: 25 size 0.6% taper (n = 15), and Group IV: 25 size 0.4% taper (n = 15). Postinstrumentation imaging was carried out using cone-beam computed tomography, and computer-aided design models were obtained. Subgrouping was done based on the nozzle position, and computational fluid dynamic analysis was carried out for the respective parameters assessed. RESULTS: Statistical significance was elicited in all the groups at different nozzle positions analyzed (P < 0.05). A post hoc test revealed significance in the mean flow rate and flow velocity in Group I at low nozzle position (P < 0.05) as compared to others. CONCLUSIONS: 30 size 0.6% tapered preparations proved efficient irrigant flow and least apical pressures at all nozzle positions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8896124/ /pubmed/35282587 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_651_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sujith, Immadi Laxmi
Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata
Ramesh, Sindhu
Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An ex vivo study
title Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An ex vivo study
title_full Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An ex vivo study
title_fullStr Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An ex vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An ex vivo study
title_short Assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: An ex vivo study
title_sort assessment of irrigant flow and apical pressure in simulated canals of single-rooted teeth with different root canal tapers and apical preparation sizes: an ex vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282587
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_651_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sujithimmadilaxmi assessmentofirrigantflowandapicalpressureinsimulatedcanalsofsinglerootedteethwithdifferentrootcanaltapersandapicalpreparationsizesanexvivostudy
AT tejakavalipurapuvenkata assessmentofirrigantflowandapicalpressureinsimulatedcanalsofsinglerootedteethwithdifferentrootcanaltapersandapicalpreparationsizesanexvivostudy
AT rameshsindhu assessmentofirrigantflowandapicalpressureinsimulatedcanalsofsinglerootedteethwithdifferentrootcanaltapersandapicalpreparationsizesanexvivostudy