Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study

AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parikh, Margi, Kishan, Karkala Venkappa, Shah, Nimisha Chinmay, Parikh, Maitry, Saklecha, Purnima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282571
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed. RESULTS: The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%. CONCLUSION: Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth.