Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study
AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21 |
Sumario: | AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed. RESULTS: The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%. CONCLUSION: Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth. |
---|