Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study
AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21 |
_version_ | 1784663089690443776 |
---|---|
author | Parikh, Margi Kishan, Karkala Venkappa Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Parikh, Maitry Saklecha, Purnima |
author_facet | Parikh, Margi Kishan, Karkala Venkappa Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Parikh, Maitry Saklecha, Purnima |
author_sort | Parikh, Margi |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed. RESULTS: The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%. CONCLUSION: Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8896135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88961352022-03-10 Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study Parikh, Margi Kishan, Karkala Venkappa Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Parikh, Maitry Saklecha, Purnima J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed. RESULTS: The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%. CONCLUSION: Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8896135/ /pubmed/35282571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Parikh, Margi Kishan, Karkala Venkappa Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Parikh, Maitry Saklecha, Purnima Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study |
title | Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: a clinical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parikhmargi comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy AT kishankarkalavenkappa comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy AT shahnimishachinmay comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy AT parikhmaitry comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy AT saklechapurnima comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy |