Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study

AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parikh, Margi, Kishan, Karkala Venkappa, Shah, Nimisha Chinmay, Parikh, Maitry, Saklecha, Purnima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282571
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21
_version_ 1784663089690443776
author Parikh, Margi
Kishan, Karkala Venkappa
Shah, Nimisha Chinmay
Parikh, Maitry
Saklecha, Purnima
author_facet Parikh, Margi
Kishan, Karkala Venkappa
Shah, Nimisha Chinmay
Parikh, Maitry
Saklecha, Purnima
author_sort Parikh, Margi
collection PubMed
description AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed. RESULTS: The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%. CONCLUSION: Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88961352022-03-10 Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study Parikh, Margi Kishan, Karkala Venkappa Shah, Nimisha Chinmay Parikh, Maitry Saklecha, Purnima J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed. RESULTS: The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%. CONCLUSION: Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8896135/ /pubmed/35282571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parikh, Margi
Kishan, Karkala Venkappa
Shah, Nimisha Chinmay
Parikh, Maitry
Saklecha, Purnima
Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study
title Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study
title_full Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study
title_short Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study
title_sort comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: a clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282571
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_321_21
work_keys_str_mv AT parikhmargi comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy
AT kishankarkalavenkappa comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy
AT shahnimishachinmay comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy
AT parikhmaitry comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy
AT saklechapurnima comparativeevaluationofbiodentineandendosequencerootrepairmaterialasdirectpulpcappingmaterialaclinicalstudy