Cargando…

Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report

BACKGROUND: Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is approved therapy for the treatment of intractable epilepsy. The stimulation of either nerve, left or right, is effective. However, due to the anatomic and physiological effects of cardiac innervation, the right vagus nerve is typically avoided in order to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Hayden, Moore, Alexandra, Paydak, Hakan, Hundley, Kelsey, Palys, Viktoras
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02585-6
_version_ 1784663093136064512
author Scott, Hayden
Moore, Alexandra
Paydak, Hakan
Hundley, Kelsey
Palys, Viktoras
author_facet Scott, Hayden
Moore, Alexandra
Paydak, Hakan
Hundley, Kelsey
Palys, Viktoras
author_sort Scott, Hayden
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is approved therapy for the treatment of intractable epilepsy. The stimulation of either nerve, left or right, is effective. However, due to the anatomic and physiological effects of cardiac innervation, the right vagus nerve is typically avoided in order to minimize the risk of cardiac bradyarrhythmias. The location of the VNS lead contacts on the nerve can also have an effect, namely, more distally placed contacts have been associated with lower risk of cardiac arrhythmias, presumably by avoiding vagal cervical cardiac branches; however, our case demonstrates reproducible asystole despite left sided, distal VNS lead placement. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 28-year-old male patient with pharmacoresistant generalized clonic-tonic seizures. The VNS therapy with 1.5 mA output and 16% duty cycle drastically reduced his seizure burden for several years. The breakthrough seizures along with stabbing pain episodes at the implantable pulse generator (IPG) site have prompted the VNS lead revision surgery with new lead contacts placed more caudally than the old contacts. However, the intraoperative device interrogation with 1 mA output resulted in immediate asystole for the duration of stimulation and it was reproducible until the output was decreased to 0.675 mA. CONCLUSIONS: Our case highlights the possibility of new severe cardiac bradyarrhythmias following surgical VNS lead replacements even in patients without preoperatively known clinical side effects. We suggest preoperative electrocardiography and cardiology consultation for detected abnormalities for all patients undergoing new VNS implantations, as well as revision surgeries for VNS malfunctions. Intraoperatively, the surgeon and anesthesia team should be vigilant of cardiac rhythms and prepared for the immediate management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88961512022-03-10 Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report Scott, Hayden Moore, Alexandra Paydak, Hakan Hundley, Kelsey Palys, Viktoras BMC Neurol Case Report BACKGROUND: Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is approved therapy for the treatment of intractable epilepsy. The stimulation of either nerve, left or right, is effective. However, due to the anatomic and physiological effects of cardiac innervation, the right vagus nerve is typically avoided in order to minimize the risk of cardiac bradyarrhythmias. The location of the VNS lead contacts on the nerve can also have an effect, namely, more distally placed contacts have been associated with lower risk of cardiac arrhythmias, presumably by avoiding vagal cervical cardiac branches; however, our case demonstrates reproducible asystole despite left sided, distal VNS lead placement. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 28-year-old male patient with pharmacoresistant generalized clonic-tonic seizures. The VNS therapy with 1.5 mA output and 16% duty cycle drastically reduced his seizure burden for several years. The breakthrough seizures along with stabbing pain episodes at the implantable pulse generator (IPG) site have prompted the VNS lead revision surgery with new lead contacts placed more caudally than the old contacts. However, the intraoperative device interrogation with 1 mA output resulted in immediate asystole for the duration of stimulation and it was reproducible until the output was decreased to 0.675 mA. CONCLUSIONS: Our case highlights the possibility of new severe cardiac bradyarrhythmias following surgical VNS lead replacements even in patients without preoperatively known clinical side effects. We suggest preoperative electrocardiography and cardiology consultation for detected abnormalities for all patients undergoing new VNS implantations, as well as revision surgeries for VNS malfunctions. Intraoperatively, the surgeon and anesthesia team should be vigilant of cardiac rhythms and prepared for the immediate management. BioMed Central 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8896151/ /pubmed/35246068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02585-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Case Report
Scott, Hayden
Moore, Alexandra
Paydak, Hakan
Hundley, Kelsey
Palys, Viktoras
Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report
title Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report
title_full Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report
title_fullStr Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report
title_short Reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report
title_sort reproducible asystole following vagal nerve stimulator lead replacement: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02585-6
work_keys_str_mv AT scotthayden reproducibleasystolefollowingvagalnervestimulatorleadreplacementacasereport
AT moorealexandra reproducibleasystolefollowingvagalnervestimulatorleadreplacementacasereport
AT paydakhakan reproducibleasystolefollowingvagalnervestimulatorleadreplacementacasereport
AT hundleykelsey reproducibleasystolefollowingvagalnervestimulatorleadreplacementacasereport
AT palysviktoras reproducibleasystolefollowingvagalnervestimulatorleadreplacementacasereport