Cargando…

Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Acute acromioclavicular joint separation is a common injury to the shoulder. Various surgical reconstruction methods exist when operative management is required, but the optimal procedure is not known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review the literature to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartland, Alexander W., Nayar, Sandeep Krishan, Teoh, Kar Hao, Rashid, Mustafa S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IJS Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340767
http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.172
_version_ 1784663118502166528
author Hartland, Alexander W.
Nayar, Sandeep Krishan
Teoh, Kar Hao
Rashid, Mustafa S.
author_facet Hartland, Alexander W.
Nayar, Sandeep Krishan
Teoh, Kar Hao
Rashid, Mustafa S.
author_sort Hartland, Alexander W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Acute acromioclavicular joint separation is a common injury to the shoulder. Various surgical reconstruction methods exist when operative management is required, but the optimal procedure is not known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review the literature to assess the clinical effectiveness of various surgical reconstruction modalities used for acute ACJ separation. METHODS: The study protocol was designed and registered prospectively on PROSPERO (International prospective register for systematic reviews). Literature search will include MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library electronic databases. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating surgical procedures for acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation will be included. Our primary outcome is any functional patient-reported outcome measure related to the shoulder. Secondary outcomes may include radiological measurements, objective measurements of strength testing, range of motion, other patient-reported outcome measures not specific to the shoulder such as the Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, timelines for return to sport or work, and rate of complications. Risk of bias will be assessed within each study using The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and the Jadad score. Inconsistency and bias across included studies will be assessed statistically. Comparable outcome data will be pooled and analysed quantitatively or qualitatively as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study did not require ethical clearance. We plan to publish this systematic review and meta-analysis in a peer-reviewed journal and present the results at various national and international conferences. HIGHLIGHTS: There is currently variation in surgical synthetic ligament reconstruction techniques for acute acromioclavicular separation, with no clear consensus established. This systematic review evaluates the clinical effectiveness of various surgical reconstruction modalities used for acute ACJ separation. Our primary outcome is any functional patient-reported outcome measure related to the shoulder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher IJS Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88962382022-03-24 Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hartland, Alexander W. Nayar, Sandeep Krishan Teoh, Kar Hao Rashid, Mustafa S. Int J Surg Protoc Protocol INTRODUCTION: Acute acromioclavicular joint separation is a common injury to the shoulder. Various surgical reconstruction methods exist when operative management is required, but the optimal procedure is not known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review the literature to assess the clinical effectiveness of various surgical reconstruction modalities used for acute ACJ separation. METHODS: The study protocol was designed and registered prospectively on PROSPERO (International prospective register for systematic reviews). Literature search will include MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library electronic databases. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating surgical procedures for acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation will be included. Our primary outcome is any functional patient-reported outcome measure related to the shoulder. Secondary outcomes may include radiological measurements, objective measurements of strength testing, range of motion, other patient-reported outcome measures not specific to the shoulder such as the Visual-Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, timelines for return to sport or work, and rate of complications. Risk of bias will be assessed within each study using The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and the Jadad score. Inconsistency and bias across included studies will be assessed statistically. Comparable outcome data will be pooled and analysed quantitatively or qualitatively as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study did not require ethical clearance. We plan to publish this systematic review and meta-analysis in a peer-reviewed journal and present the results at various national and international conferences. HIGHLIGHTS: There is currently variation in surgical synthetic ligament reconstruction techniques for acute acromioclavicular separation, with no clear consensus established. This systematic review evaluates the clinical effectiveness of various surgical reconstruction modalities used for acute ACJ separation. Our primary outcome is any functional patient-reported outcome measure related to the shoulder. IJS Publishing Group 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8896238/ /pubmed/35340767 http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.172 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Protocol
Hartland, Alexander W.
Nayar, Sandeep Krishan
Teoh, Kar Hao
Rashid, Mustafa S.
Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinical Effectiveness of Various Surgical Reconstruction Modalities for Acute ACJ Separation: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinical effectiveness of various surgical reconstruction modalities for acute acj separation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340767
http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.172
work_keys_str_mv AT hartlandalexanderw clinicaleffectivenessofvarioussurgicalreconstructionmodalitiesforacuteacjseparationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nayarsandeepkrishan clinicaleffectivenessofvarioussurgicalreconstructionmodalitiesforacuteacjseparationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT teohkarhao clinicaleffectivenessofvarioussurgicalreconstructionmodalitiesforacuteacjseparationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rashidmustafas clinicaleffectivenessofvarioussurgicalreconstructionmodalitiesforacuteacjseparationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis