Cargando…

Development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) is associated with a risk of adverse events and comorbidities. As such, a goal in assessing the efficacy of biologics in severe asthma is often to monitor reduction in OCS usage. Importantly, however, OCS dose reductions must be conducted witho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korn, Stephanie, Howarth, Peter, Smith, Steven G., Price, Robert G., Yancey, Steven W., Prazma, Charlene M., Bel, Elisabeth H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01959-1
_version_ 1784663130224197632
author Korn, Stephanie
Howarth, Peter
Smith, Steven G.
Price, Robert G.
Yancey, Steven W.
Prazma, Charlene M.
Bel, Elisabeth H.
author_facet Korn, Stephanie
Howarth, Peter
Smith, Steven G.
Price, Robert G.
Yancey, Steven W.
Prazma, Charlene M.
Bel, Elisabeth H.
author_sort Korn, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-term use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) is associated with a risk of adverse events and comorbidities. As such, a goal in assessing the efficacy of biologics in severe asthma is often to monitor reduction in OCS usage. Importantly, however, OCS dose reductions must be conducted without loss of disease control. MAIN BODY: Herein, we describe the development of OCS-sparing study methodologies for biologic therapies in patients with asthma. In particular, we focus on four randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of varying sizes (key single-center study [n = 20], SIRIUS [n = 135], ZONDA [n = 220], VENTURE [n = 210]) and one open-label study (PONENTE [n = 598]), which assessed the effect of asthma biologics (mepolizumab, benralizumab or dupilumab) on OCS use using predefined OCS-tapering schedules. In particular, we discuss the evolution of study design elements in these studies, including patient eligibility criteria, the use of tailored OCS dose reduction schedules, monitoring of outcomes, the use of biomarkers and use of repetitive assessments of adrenal function during OCS tapering. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these developments have improved OCS-sparing asthma studies in recent years and the lessons learned may help with optimization of further OCS-sparing studies, and potentially clinical practice in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-01959-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88962842022-03-14 Development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma Korn, Stephanie Howarth, Peter Smith, Steven G. Price, Robert G. Yancey, Steven W. Prazma, Charlene M. Bel, Elisabeth H. Respir Res Commentary BACKGROUND: Long-term use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) is associated with a risk of adverse events and comorbidities. As such, a goal in assessing the efficacy of biologics in severe asthma is often to monitor reduction in OCS usage. Importantly, however, OCS dose reductions must be conducted without loss of disease control. MAIN BODY: Herein, we describe the development of OCS-sparing study methodologies for biologic therapies in patients with asthma. In particular, we focus on four randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of varying sizes (key single-center study [n = 20], SIRIUS [n = 135], ZONDA [n = 220], VENTURE [n = 210]) and one open-label study (PONENTE [n = 598]), which assessed the effect of asthma biologics (mepolizumab, benralizumab or dupilumab) on OCS use using predefined OCS-tapering schedules. In particular, we discuss the evolution of study design elements in these studies, including patient eligibility criteria, the use of tailored OCS dose reduction schedules, monitoring of outcomes, the use of biomarkers and use of repetitive assessments of adrenal function during OCS tapering. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these developments have improved OCS-sparing asthma studies in recent years and the lessons learned may help with optimization of further OCS-sparing studies, and potentially clinical practice in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-01959-1. BioMed Central 2022-03-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8896284/ /pubmed/35246123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01959-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Korn, Stephanie
Howarth, Peter
Smith, Steven G.
Price, Robert G.
Yancey, Steven W.
Prazma, Charlene M.
Bel, Elisabeth H.
Development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma
title Development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma
title_full Development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma
title_fullStr Development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma
title_full_unstemmed Development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma
title_short Development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma
title_sort development of methodology for assessing steroid-tapering in clinical trials for biologics in asthma
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01959-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kornstephanie developmentofmethodologyforassessingsteroidtaperinginclinicaltrialsforbiologicsinasthma
AT howarthpeter developmentofmethodologyforassessingsteroidtaperinginclinicaltrialsforbiologicsinasthma
AT smithsteveng developmentofmethodologyforassessingsteroidtaperinginclinicaltrialsforbiologicsinasthma
AT pricerobertg developmentofmethodologyforassessingsteroidtaperinginclinicaltrialsforbiologicsinasthma
AT yanceystevenw developmentofmethodologyforassessingsteroidtaperinginclinicaltrialsforbiologicsinasthma
AT prazmacharlenem developmentofmethodologyforassessingsteroidtaperinginclinicaltrialsforbiologicsinasthma
AT belelisabethh developmentofmethodologyforassessingsteroidtaperinginclinicaltrialsforbiologicsinasthma