Cargando…

Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning

Humans deftly parse statistics from sequences. Some theories posit that humans learn these statistics by forming cognitive maps, or underlying representations of the latent space which links items in the sequence. Here, an item in the sequence is a node, and the probability of transitioning between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stiso, Jennifer, Lynn, Christopher W., Kahn, Ari E., Rangarajan, Vinitha, Szymula, Karol P., Archer, Ryan, Revell, Andrew, Stein, Joel M., Litt, Brian, Davis, Kathryn A., Lucas, Timothy H., Bassett, Dani S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0361-21.2022
_version_ 1784663189980446720
author Stiso, Jennifer
Lynn, Christopher W.
Kahn, Ari E.
Rangarajan, Vinitha
Szymula, Karol P.
Archer, Ryan
Revell, Andrew
Stein, Joel M.
Litt, Brian
Davis, Kathryn A.
Lucas, Timothy H.
Bassett, Dani S.
author_facet Stiso, Jennifer
Lynn, Christopher W.
Kahn, Ari E.
Rangarajan, Vinitha
Szymula, Karol P.
Archer, Ryan
Revell, Andrew
Stein, Joel M.
Litt, Brian
Davis, Kathryn A.
Lucas, Timothy H.
Bassett, Dani S.
author_sort Stiso, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Humans deftly parse statistics from sequences. Some theories posit that humans learn these statistics by forming cognitive maps, or underlying representations of the latent space which links items in the sequence. Here, an item in the sequence is a node, and the probability of transitioning between two items is an edge. Sequences can then be generated from walks through the latent space, with different spaces giving rise to different sequence statistics. Individual or group differences in sequence learning can be modeled by changing the time scale over which estimates of transition probabilities are built, or in other words, by changing the amount of temporal discounting. Latent space models with temporal discounting bear a resemblance to models of navigation through Euclidean spaces. However, few explicit links have been made between predictions from Euclidean spatial navigation and neural activity during human sequence learning. Here, we use a combination of behavioral modeling and intracranial encephalography (iEEG) recordings to investigate how neural activity might support the formation of space-like cognitive maps through temporal discounting during sequence learning. Specifically, we acquire human reaction times from a sequential reaction time task, to which we fit a model that formulates the amount of temporal discounting as a single free parameter. From the parameter, we calculate each individual’s estimate of the latent space. We find that neural activity reflects these estimates mostly in the temporal lobe, including areas involved in spatial navigation. Similar to spatial navigation, we find that low-dimensional representations of neural activity allow for easy separation of important features, such as modules, in the latent space. Lastly, we take advantage of the high temporal resolution of iEEG data to determine the time scale on which latent spaces are learned. We find that learning typically happens within the first 500 trials, and is modulated by the underlying latent space and the amount of temporal discounting characteristic of each participant. Ultimately, this work provides important links between behavioral models of sequence learning and neural activity during the same behavior, and contextualizes these results within a broader framework of domain general cognitive maps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88965542022-03-07 Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning Stiso, Jennifer Lynn, Christopher W. Kahn, Ari E. Rangarajan, Vinitha Szymula, Karol P. Archer, Ryan Revell, Andrew Stein, Joel M. Litt, Brian Davis, Kathryn A. Lucas, Timothy H. Bassett, Dani S. eNeuro Research Article: New Research Humans deftly parse statistics from sequences. Some theories posit that humans learn these statistics by forming cognitive maps, or underlying representations of the latent space which links items in the sequence. Here, an item in the sequence is a node, and the probability of transitioning between two items is an edge. Sequences can then be generated from walks through the latent space, with different spaces giving rise to different sequence statistics. Individual or group differences in sequence learning can be modeled by changing the time scale over which estimates of transition probabilities are built, or in other words, by changing the amount of temporal discounting. Latent space models with temporal discounting bear a resemblance to models of navigation through Euclidean spaces. However, few explicit links have been made between predictions from Euclidean spatial navigation and neural activity during human sequence learning. Here, we use a combination of behavioral modeling and intracranial encephalography (iEEG) recordings to investigate how neural activity might support the formation of space-like cognitive maps through temporal discounting during sequence learning. Specifically, we acquire human reaction times from a sequential reaction time task, to which we fit a model that formulates the amount of temporal discounting as a single free parameter. From the parameter, we calculate each individual’s estimate of the latent space. We find that neural activity reflects these estimates mostly in the temporal lobe, including areas involved in spatial navigation. Similar to spatial navigation, we find that low-dimensional representations of neural activity allow for easy separation of important features, such as modules, in the latent space. Lastly, we take advantage of the high temporal resolution of iEEG data to determine the time scale on which latent spaces are learned. We find that learning typically happens within the first 500 trials, and is modulated by the underlying latent space and the amount of temporal discounting characteristic of each participant. Ultimately, this work provides important links between behavioral models of sequence learning and neural activity during the same behavior, and contextualizes these results within a broader framework of domain general cognitive maps. Society for Neuroscience 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8896554/ /pubmed/35105662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0361-21.2022 Text en Copyright © 2022 Stiso et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article: New Research
Stiso, Jennifer
Lynn, Christopher W.
Kahn, Ari E.
Rangarajan, Vinitha
Szymula, Karol P.
Archer, Ryan
Revell, Andrew
Stein, Joel M.
Litt, Brian
Davis, Kathryn A.
Lucas, Timothy H.
Bassett, Dani S.
Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning
title Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning
title_full Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning
title_fullStr Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning
title_short Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning
title_sort neurophysiological evidence for cognitive map formation during sequence learning
topic Research Article: New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0361-21.2022
work_keys_str_mv AT stisojennifer neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT lynnchristopherw neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT kahnarie neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT rangarajanvinitha neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT szymulakarolp neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT archerryan neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT revellandrew neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT steinjoelm neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT littbrian neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT daviskathryna neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT lucastimothyh neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning
AT bassettdanis neurophysiologicalevidenceforcognitivemapformationduringsequencelearning