Cargando…

In-vitro Comparative Evaluation for the Surface Properties and Impact Strength of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of data regarding the effect of fabrication techniques and compositions of CAD/CAM milled, 3D-printed, and polyamide flexible denture base resin materials (DBRMs) on the surface roughness (SR), surface hardness (SH), and impact strength (IS). Therefore, this study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helal, Mohamed A, Fadl-Alah, Ahmed, Baraka, Yasser M, Gad, Mohammed M, Emam, Abdel-Naser M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35281683
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_293_21
_version_ 1784663196204793856
author Helal, Mohamed A
Fadl-Alah, Ahmed
Baraka, Yasser M
Gad, Mohammed M
Emam, Abdel-Naser M
author_facet Helal, Mohamed A
Fadl-Alah, Ahmed
Baraka, Yasser M
Gad, Mohammed M
Emam, Abdel-Naser M
author_sort Helal, Mohamed A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of data regarding the effect of fabrication techniques and compositions of CAD/CAM milled, 3D-printed, and polyamide flexible denture base resin materials (DBRMs) on the surface roughness (SR), surface hardness (SH), and impact strength (IS). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the SR, SH, and IS of CAD/CAM milled, 3D-printed, and polyamide flexible DBRMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety specimens were constructed from different DBRMs and divided into three groups (CAD/CAM, 3D-printed, and polyamide DBRMs; n = 30) with specific measurements: 15 × 10 × 2.5 mm for SR and H tests and 80 × 10 × 4 mm notched specimen for IS test. SR meter and Vickers micro SH tester were used to measure SR and SH, respectively, whereas the IS was evaluated using Charpy’s impact testing machine. Data were collected and statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey’s tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: There were significant differences between the tested materials (P< 0.05). The CAD/CAM milled showed lowest SR when compared with 3D-printed resin and polyamide flexible resin (P< 0.05); however, there was a significant increase in SH of CAD/CAM milled and 3D-printed DBRMs when compared with polyamide materials (P< 0.05). There was a significant increase in IS of polyamide and CAD/CAM milled resins when compared with 3D-printed DBRMs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CAD/CAM milled resins showed high IS and SH with lower SR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88965892022-03-10 In-vitro Comparative Evaluation for the Surface Properties and Impact Strength of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins Helal, Mohamed A Fadl-Alah, Ahmed Baraka, Yasser M Gad, Mohammed M Emam, Abdel-Naser M J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of data regarding the effect of fabrication techniques and compositions of CAD/CAM milled, 3D-printed, and polyamide flexible denture base resin materials (DBRMs) on the surface roughness (SR), surface hardness (SH), and impact strength (IS). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the SR, SH, and IS of CAD/CAM milled, 3D-printed, and polyamide flexible DBRMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety specimens were constructed from different DBRMs and divided into three groups (CAD/CAM, 3D-printed, and polyamide DBRMs; n = 30) with specific measurements: 15 × 10 × 2.5 mm for SR and H tests and 80 × 10 × 4 mm notched specimen for IS test. SR meter and Vickers micro SH tester were used to measure SR and SH, respectively, whereas the IS was evaluated using Charpy’s impact testing machine. Data were collected and statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey’s tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: There were significant differences between the tested materials (P< 0.05). The CAD/CAM milled showed lowest SR when compared with 3D-printed resin and polyamide flexible resin (P< 0.05); however, there was a significant increase in SH of CAD/CAM milled and 3D-printed DBRMs when compared with polyamide materials (P< 0.05). There was a significant increase in IS of polyamide and CAD/CAM milled resins when compared with 3D-printed DBRMs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CAD/CAM milled resins showed high IS and SH with lower SR. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8896589/ /pubmed/35281683 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_293_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Helal, Mohamed A
Fadl-Alah, Ahmed
Baraka, Yasser M
Gad, Mohammed M
Emam, Abdel-Naser M
In-vitro Comparative Evaluation for the Surface Properties and Impact Strength of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins
title In-vitro Comparative Evaluation for the Surface Properties and Impact Strength of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins
title_full In-vitro Comparative Evaluation for the Surface Properties and Impact Strength of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins
title_fullStr In-vitro Comparative Evaluation for the Surface Properties and Impact Strength of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins
title_full_unstemmed In-vitro Comparative Evaluation for the Surface Properties and Impact Strength of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins
title_short In-vitro Comparative Evaluation for the Surface Properties and Impact Strength of CAD/CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins
title_sort in-vitro comparative evaluation for the surface properties and impact strength of cad/cam milled, 3d printed, and polyamide denture base resins
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35281683
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_293_21
work_keys_str_mv AT helalmohameda invitrocomparativeevaluationforthesurfacepropertiesandimpactstrengthofcadcammilled3dprintedandpolyamidedenturebaseresins
AT fadlalahahmed invitrocomparativeevaluationforthesurfacepropertiesandimpactstrengthofcadcammilled3dprintedandpolyamidedenturebaseresins
AT barakayasserm invitrocomparativeevaluationforthesurfacepropertiesandimpactstrengthofcadcammilled3dprintedandpolyamidedenturebaseresins
AT gadmohammedm invitrocomparativeevaluationforthesurfacepropertiesandimpactstrengthofcadcammilled3dprintedandpolyamidedenturebaseresins
AT emamabdelnaserm invitrocomparativeevaluationforthesurfacepropertiesandimpactstrengthofcadcammilled3dprintedandpolyamidedenturebaseresins