Cargando…

Reference Hygiene and Death on the Internet – Decay, Rot, Half-Life, Deterioration, and Corruption

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: References for medical articles are not always retrievable. This eliminates the ability to check on the validity of statements, methodologies, data collection, and conclusions. METHODS: References of review, scientific, and research articles published in the 2019 and 2020...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ott, Douglas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35281707
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00082
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: References for medical articles are not always retrievable. This eliminates the ability to check on the validity of statements, methodologies, data collection, and conclusions. METHODS: References of review, scientific, and research articles published in the 2019 and 2020 Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons were evaluated for ability to retrieve the reference cited. RESULTS: Ninety-five articles with 2,424 references were evaluated. There were 1,025 (1,025/2,424 = 42.3%) open access versus 1,399 (1,399/2,424 = 47.7%) paywall articles. There were 357 (14.7%) citations unavailable (misreference) due to bad, broken, or nonexistent links and wrong article, abstract or citation only, and missing citations. CONCLUSION: Loss of reference existence or retrievability is a scientific hazard. Science is self-correcting but is doomed to not knowing what was said or discovered when references are no longer available.