Cargando…
“What do I need to know about you?”: the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer
PURPOSE: The Patient Dignity Question (PDQ), “What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?” is a validated instrument designed to assess patient priorities and stressors. Administration of the PDQ has been demonstrated to improve patient-provider relationships. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06938-2 |
_version_ | 1784663256455970816 |
---|---|
author | Hadler, R. A. Goldshore, M. Rosa, W. E. Nelson, J. |
author_facet | Hadler, R. A. Goldshore, M. Rosa, W. E. Nelson, J. |
author_sort | Hadler, R. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Patient Dignity Question (PDQ), “What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?” is a validated instrument designed to assess patient priorities and stressors. Administration of the PDQ has been demonstrated to improve patient-provider relationships. The PDQ has been evaluated in multiple settings, but never as a standard component of palliative care consultation. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of PDQ screening in palliative care consultation and to characterize responses. The secondary objective was to determine patient and disease factors associated with PDQ response among patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: PDQ responses were collected from 2015 to 2017, and patient survival data collected through 2018. A codebook was developed to categorize responses using literature review and template analysis; coding was performed until thematic saturation was achieved. We descriptively analyzed thematic distribution among responders and performed multivariable multinomial regression to determine the association between patient characteristics and PDQ response. RESULTS: Response to the PDQ was documented in 2053/5002 consultations (41.1%); 1877 patient responses were included in final analysis. A total of 544 (29.5%) patients referenced illness-related concerns, 879 (46.8%) shared personal insights, and 283 (15.1%) cited interpersonal relationships. Younger patients frequently reported illness-related concerns; older respondents (age > 65) often responded with insights into their identity. Patients’ responses evaluated less than 1 year before death were more likely to focus upon identity and interpersonal relationships than illness-related concerns. CONCLUSION: The PDQ can be used as a means of eliciting values among patients with cancer. Variations in response pattern suggest that approaches to distress may be tailored to age and proximity to death. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06938-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8896848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88968482022-03-07 “What do I need to know about you?”: the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer Hadler, R. A. Goldshore, M. Rosa, W. E. Nelson, J. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The Patient Dignity Question (PDQ), “What do I need to know about you as a person to give you the best care possible?” is a validated instrument designed to assess patient priorities and stressors. Administration of the PDQ has been demonstrated to improve patient-provider relationships. The PDQ has been evaluated in multiple settings, but never as a standard component of palliative care consultation. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of PDQ screening in palliative care consultation and to characterize responses. The secondary objective was to determine patient and disease factors associated with PDQ response among patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: PDQ responses were collected from 2015 to 2017, and patient survival data collected through 2018. A codebook was developed to categorize responses using literature review and template analysis; coding was performed until thematic saturation was achieved. We descriptively analyzed thematic distribution among responders and performed multivariable multinomial regression to determine the association between patient characteristics and PDQ response. RESULTS: Response to the PDQ was documented in 2053/5002 consultations (41.1%); 1877 patient responses were included in final analysis. A total of 544 (29.5%) patients referenced illness-related concerns, 879 (46.8%) shared personal insights, and 283 (15.1%) cited interpersonal relationships. Younger patients frequently reported illness-related concerns; older respondents (age > 65) often responded with insights into their identity. Patients’ responses evaluated less than 1 year before death were more likely to focus upon identity and interpersonal relationships than illness-related concerns. CONCLUSION: The PDQ can be used as a means of eliciting values among patients with cancer. Variations in response pattern suggest that approaches to distress may be tailored to age and proximity to death. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06938-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8896848/ /pubmed/35246729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06938-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hadler, R. A. Goldshore, M. Rosa, W. E. Nelson, J. “What do I need to know about you?”: the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer |
title | “What do I need to know about you?”: the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer |
title_full | “What do I need to know about you?”: the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer |
title_fullStr | “What do I need to know about you?”: the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | “What do I need to know about you?”: the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer |
title_short | “What do I need to know about you?”: the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer |
title_sort | “what do i need to know about you?”: the patient dignity question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06938-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadlerra whatdoineedtoknowaboutyouthepatientdignityquestionageandproximitytodeathamongpatientswithcancer AT goldshorem whatdoineedtoknowaboutyouthepatientdignityquestionageandproximitytodeathamongpatientswithcancer AT rosawe whatdoineedtoknowaboutyouthepatientdignityquestionageandproximitytodeathamongpatientswithcancer AT nelsonj whatdoineedtoknowaboutyouthepatientdignityquestionageandproximitytodeathamongpatientswithcancer |