Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial

STUDY DESIGN: A multisite, randomized, controlled, double-blinded phase I/II clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of pairing noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with rehabilitation to promote paretic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arora, Tarun, O’Laughlin, Kyle, Potter-Baker, Kelsey, Kirshblum, Steven, Kilgore, Kevin, Forrest, Gail F., Bryden, Anne M., Wang, Xiaofeng, Henzel, M. Kristi, Li, Manshi, Perlic, Kaitlin, Richmond, Mary Ann, Pundik, Svetlana, Bethoux, Francois, Frost, Frederick, Plow, Ela B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00768-z
_version_ 1784663294709071872
author Arora, Tarun
O’Laughlin, Kyle
Potter-Baker, Kelsey
Kirshblum, Steven
Kilgore, Kevin
Forrest, Gail F.
Bryden, Anne M.
Wang, Xiaofeng
Henzel, M. Kristi
Li, Manshi
Perlic, Kaitlin
Richmond, Mary Ann
Pundik, Svetlana
Bethoux, Francois
Frost, Frederick
Plow, Ela B.
author_facet Arora, Tarun
O’Laughlin, Kyle
Potter-Baker, Kelsey
Kirshblum, Steven
Kilgore, Kevin
Forrest, Gail F.
Bryden, Anne M.
Wang, Xiaofeng
Henzel, M. Kristi
Li, Manshi
Perlic, Kaitlin
Richmond, Mary Ann
Pundik, Svetlana
Bethoux, Francois
Frost, Frederick
Plow, Ela B.
author_sort Arora, Tarun
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A multisite, randomized, controlled, double-blinded phase I/II clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of pairing noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with rehabilitation to promote paretic upper extremity recovery and functional independence in persons living with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Four-site trial conducted across Cleveland Clinic, Louis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Cleveland and MetroHealth Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Institute of Ohio, and Kessler Foundation of New Jersey. METHODS: Forty-four adults (age ≥18 years) with tetraplegia following cervical SCI that occurred ≥1-year ago will participate. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive anodal tDCS or sham tDCS given in combination with upper extremity rehabilitation for 15 sessions each over 3–5 weeks. Assessments will be made twice at baseline separated by at least a 3-week interval, once at end-of-intervention, and once at 3-month follow-up. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measure is upper extremity motor impairment assessed using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) scale. Functional abilities will be assessed using Capabilities of Upper Extremity-Test (CUE-T), while functional independence and participation restrictions will be evaluated using the self-care domain of Spinal Cord Independent Measure (SCIM), and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment-associated change in corticospinal excitability and output will also be studied using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and safety (reports of adverse events) and feasibility (attrition, adherence etc.) will also be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov identifier NCT03892746. This clinical trial is being performed at four sites within the United States: Cleveland Clinic (lead site), Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) and MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute in Ohio, and Kessler Foundation in New Jersey. The U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick MD 21702-5014 is the awarding and administering acquisition office.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88969742022-03-07 Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial Arora, Tarun O’Laughlin, Kyle Potter-Baker, Kelsey Kirshblum, Steven Kilgore, Kevin Forrest, Gail F. Bryden, Anne M. Wang, Xiaofeng Henzel, M. Kristi Li, Manshi Perlic, Kaitlin Richmond, Mary Ann Pundik, Svetlana Bethoux, Francois Frost, Frederick Plow, Ela B. Spinal Cord Article STUDY DESIGN: A multisite, randomized, controlled, double-blinded phase I/II clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of pairing noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with rehabilitation to promote paretic upper extremity recovery and functional independence in persons living with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Four-site trial conducted across Cleveland Clinic, Louis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Cleveland and MetroHealth Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Institute of Ohio, and Kessler Foundation of New Jersey. METHODS: Forty-four adults (age ≥18 years) with tetraplegia following cervical SCI that occurred ≥1-year ago will participate. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive anodal tDCS or sham tDCS given in combination with upper extremity rehabilitation for 15 sessions each over 3–5 weeks. Assessments will be made twice at baseline separated by at least a 3-week interval, once at end-of-intervention, and once at 3-month follow-up. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measure is upper extremity motor impairment assessed using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) scale. Functional abilities will be assessed using Capabilities of Upper Extremity-Test (CUE-T), while functional independence and participation restrictions will be evaluated using the self-care domain of Spinal Cord Independent Measure (SCIM), and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment-associated change in corticospinal excitability and output will also be studied using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and safety (reports of adverse events) and feasibility (attrition, adherence etc.) will also be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov identifier NCT03892746. This clinical trial is being performed at four sites within the United States: Cleveland Clinic (lead site), Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) and MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute in Ohio, and Kessler Foundation in New Jersey. The U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick MD 21702-5014 is the awarding and administering acquisition office. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8896974/ /pubmed/35246620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00768-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Arora, Tarun
O’Laughlin, Kyle
Potter-Baker, Kelsey
Kirshblum, Steven
Kilgore, Kevin
Forrest, Gail F.
Bryden, Anne M.
Wang, Xiaofeng
Henzel, M. Kristi
Li, Manshi
Perlic, Kaitlin
Richmond, Mary Ann
Pundik, Svetlana
Bethoux, Francois
Frost, Frederick
Plow, Ela B.
Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial
title Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial
title_full Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial
title_short Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial
title_sort safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00768-z
work_keys_str_mv AT aroratarun safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT olaughlinkyle safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT potterbakerkelsey safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kirshblumsteven safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kilgorekevin safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT forrestgailf safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT brydenannem safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wangxiaofeng safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT henzelmkristi safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT limanshi safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT perlickaitlin safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT richmondmaryann safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pundiksvetlana safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bethouxfrancois safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT frostfrederick safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT plowelab safetyandefficacyoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinupperextremityrehabilitationaftertetraplegiaprotocolofamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial