Cargando…

No evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fMRI

It has been proposed that a form of cortical reorganization (changes in functional connectivity between brain areas) can be assessed with resting-state (rs) functional MRI (fMRI). Here, we report a longitudinal data set collected from 19 patients with subcortical stroke and 11 controls. Patients wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Branscheidt, Meret, Ejaz, Naveed, Xu, Jing, Widmer, Mario, Harran, Michelle D., Cortés, Juan Camilo, Kitago, Tomoko, Celnik, Pablo, Hernandez-Castillo, Carlos, Diedrichsen, Jörn, Luft, Andreas, Krakauer, John W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00148.2021
_version_ 1784663299015573504
author Branscheidt, Meret
Ejaz, Naveed
Xu, Jing
Widmer, Mario
Harran, Michelle D.
Cortés, Juan Camilo
Kitago, Tomoko
Celnik, Pablo
Hernandez-Castillo, Carlos
Diedrichsen, Jörn
Luft, Andreas
Krakauer, John W.
author_facet Branscheidt, Meret
Ejaz, Naveed
Xu, Jing
Widmer, Mario
Harran, Michelle D.
Cortés, Juan Camilo
Kitago, Tomoko
Celnik, Pablo
Hernandez-Castillo, Carlos
Diedrichsen, Jörn
Luft, Andreas
Krakauer, John W.
author_sort Branscheidt, Meret
collection PubMed
description It has been proposed that a form of cortical reorganization (changes in functional connectivity between brain areas) can be assessed with resting-state (rs) functional MRI (fMRI). Here, we report a longitudinal data set collected from 19 patients with subcortical stroke and 11 controls. Patients were imaged up to five times over 1 year. We found no evidence, using rs-fMRI, for longitudinal poststroke cortical connectivity changes despite substantial behavioral recovery. These results could be construed as questioning the value of resting-state imaging. Here, we argue instead that they are consistent with other emerging reasons to challenge the idea of motor-recovery-related cortical reorganization poststroke when conceived of as changes in connectivity between cortical areas. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated longitudinal changes in functional connectivity after stroke. Despite substantial motor recovery, we found no differences in functional connectivity patterns between patients and controls, nor any changes over time. Assuming that rs-fMRI is an adequate method to capture connectivity changes between cortical regions after brain injury, these results provide reason to doubt that changes in cortico-cortical connectivity are the relevant mechanism for promoting motor recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8896990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88969902022-03-10 No evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fMRI Branscheidt, Meret Ejaz, Naveed Xu, Jing Widmer, Mario Harran, Michelle D. Cortés, Juan Camilo Kitago, Tomoko Celnik, Pablo Hernandez-Castillo, Carlos Diedrichsen, Jörn Luft, Andreas Krakauer, John W. J Neurophysiol Research Article It has been proposed that a form of cortical reorganization (changes in functional connectivity between brain areas) can be assessed with resting-state (rs) functional MRI (fMRI). Here, we report a longitudinal data set collected from 19 patients with subcortical stroke and 11 controls. Patients were imaged up to five times over 1 year. We found no evidence, using rs-fMRI, for longitudinal poststroke cortical connectivity changes despite substantial behavioral recovery. These results could be construed as questioning the value of resting-state imaging. Here, we argue instead that they are consistent with other emerging reasons to challenge the idea of motor-recovery-related cortical reorganization poststroke when conceived of as changes in connectivity between cortical areas. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated longitudinal changes in functional connectivity after stroke. Despite substantial motor recovery, we found no differences in functional connectivity patterns between patients and controls, nor any changes over time. Assuming that rs-fMRI is an adequate method to capture connectivity changes between cortical regions after brain injury, these results provide reason to doubt that changes in cortico-cortical connectivity are the relevant mechanism for promoting motor recovery. American Physiological Society 2022-03-01 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8896990/ /pubmed/34965743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00148.2021 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Published by the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Research Article
Branscheidt, Meret
Ejaz, Naveed
Xu, Jing
Widmer, Mario
Harran, Michelle D.
Cortés, Juan Camilo
Kitago, Tomoko
Celnik, Pablo
Hernandez-Castillo, Carlos
Diedrichsen, Jörn
Luft, Andreas
Krakauer, John W.
No evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fMRI
title No evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fMRI
title_full No evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fMRI
title_fullStr No evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fMRI
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fMRI
title_short No evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fMRI
title_sort no evidence for motor-recovery-related cortical connectivity changes after stroke using resting-state fmri
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00148.2021
work_keys_str_mv AT branscheidtmeret noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT ejaznaveed noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT xujing noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT widmermario noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT harranmichelled noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT cortesjuancamilo noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT kitagotomoko noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT celnikpablo noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT hernandezcastillocarlos noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT diedrichsenjorn noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT luftandreas noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri
AT krakauerjohnw noevidenceformotorrecoveryrelatedcorticalconnectivitychangesafterstrokeusingrestingstatefmri