Cargando…

Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science

One of the main problems in scientometrics is to explore the factors that affect the growth of citations in publications to identify best practices of research policy to increase the diffusion of scientific research and knowledge in science and society. The principal purpose of this study is to anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosleh, Melika, Roshani, Saeed, Coccia, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35283543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1
_version_ 1784663332314152960
author Mosleh, Melika
Roshani, Saeed
Coccia, Mario
author_facet Mosleh, Melika
Roshani, Saeed
Coccia, Mario
author_sort Mosleh, Melika
collection PubMed
description One of the main problems in scientometrics is to explore the factors that affect the growth of citations in publications to identify best practices of research policy to increase the diffusion of scientific research and knowledge in science and society. The principal purpose of this study is to analyze how research funding affects the citation-based performance of scientific output in vital research fields of life science, which is a critical province (area of knowledge) in science to improve the wellbeing of people. This study uses data from the Scopus database in 2015 (to assess the impact on citations in 2021, after more than 5 years) concerning different disciplines of life science, given by “agricultural and biological sciences”, “biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology”, “Immunology and microbiology”, “neuroscience” and “pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics”. Results demonstrate that although journals publish un-funded articles more than funded publications in all disciplines of life science, the fraction of total citations in funded papers is higher than the share in the total number of publications. In short, funded documents receive more citations than un-funded papers in all research fields of life science under study. Findings also support that citations of total (funded + un-funded), funded, and un-funded published papers have a power-law distribution in all five research fields of life science. Original results here reveal a general property in scientific development: funded research has a higher scaling potential than un-funded publications. Critical implications of research policy, systematized in a decision-making matrix, suggest that R&D investments in “Neuroscience” can generate a positive impact of scientific results in science and society-in terms of citations-higher than other research fields in medicine. Overall, then, results here can explain some characteristics driving scientific change and help policymakers and scholars to allocate resources towards research fields that facilitate the development and diffusion of scientific research and knowledge in life science for positive societal impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8897117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88971172022-03-07 Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science Mosleh, Melika Roshani, Saeed Coccia, Mario Scientometrics Article One of the main problems in scientometrics is to explore the factors that affect the growth of citations in publications to identify best practices of research policy to increase the diffusion of scientific research and knowledge in science and society. The principal purpose of this study is to analyze how research funding affects the citation-based performance of scientific output in vital research fields of life science, which is a critical province (area of knowledge) in science to improve the wellbeing of people. This study uses data from the Scopus database in 2015 (to assess the impact on citations in 2021, after more than 5 years) concerning different disciplines of life science, given by “agricultural and biological sciences”, “biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology”, “Immunology and microbiology”, “neuroscience” and “pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics”. Results demonstrate that although journals publish un-funded articles more than funded publications in all disciplines of life science, the fraction of total citations in funded papers is higher than the share in the total number of publications. In short, funded documents receive more citations than un-funded papers in all research fields of life science under study. Findings also support that citations of total (funded + un-funded), funded, and un-funded published papers have a power-law distribution in all five research fields of life science. Original results here reveal a general property in scientific development: funded research has a higher scaling potential than un-funded publications. Critical implications of research policy, systematized in a decision-making matrix, suggest that R&D investments in “Neuroscience” can generate a positive impact of scientific results in science and society-in terms of citations-higher than other research fields in medicine. Overall, then, results here can explain some characteristics driving scientific change and help policymakers and scholars to allocate resources towards research fields that facilitate the development and diffusion of scientific research and knowledge in life science for positive societal impact. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8897117/ /pubmed/35283543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Mosleh, Melika
Roshani, Saeed
Coccia, Mario
Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
title Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
title_full Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
title_fullStr Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
title_full_unstemmed Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
title_short Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
title_sort scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35283543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1
work_keys_str_mv AT moslehmelika scientificlawsofresearchfundingtosupportcitationsanddiffusionofknowledgeinlifescience
AT roshanisaeed scientificlawsofresearchfundingtosupportcitationsanddiffusionofknowledgeinlifescience
AT cocciamario scientificlawsofresearchfundingtosupportcitationsanddiffusionofknowledgeinlifescience