Cargando…

Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode

PURPOSE: Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ludwig, Sonja, Riemann, Niklas, Hans, Stefan, Christov, Florian, Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian, Saxe, Judith, Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z
_version_ 1784663377961811968
author Ludwig, Sonja
Riemann, Niklas
Hans, Stefan
Christov, Florian
Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian
Saxe, Judith
Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
author_facet Ludwig, Sonja
Riemann, Niklas
Hans, Stefan
Christov, Florian
Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian
Saxe, Judith
Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
author_sort Ludwig, Sonja
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing. METHODS: A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85 dB and/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60 dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (n = 17), while all others belonged to the noRH group (n = 30). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison. RESULTS: We compared 17 RH–30 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A§E(®) phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8897335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88973352022-03-08 Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode Ludwig, Sonja Riemann, Niklas Hans, Stefan Christov, Florian Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian Saxe, Judith Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing. METHODS: A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85 dB and/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60 dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (n = 17), while all others belonged to the noRH group (n = 30). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison. RESULTS: We compared 17 RH–30 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A§E(®) phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8897335/ /pubmed/33830367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Ludwig, Sonja
Riemann, Niklas
Hans, Stefan
Christov, Florian
Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian
Saxe, Judith
Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode
title Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode
title_full Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode
title_fullStr Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode
title_short Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode
title_sort evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ludwigsonja evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode
AT riemannniklas evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode
AT hansstefan evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode
AT christovflorian evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode
AT ludwigjohannesmaximilian evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode
AT saxejudith evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode
AT arweilerharbeckdiana evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode