Cargando…
Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode
PURPOSE: Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z |
_version_ | 1784663377961811968 |
---|---|
author | Ludwig, Sonja Riemann, Niklas Hans, Stefan Christov, Florian Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian Saxe, Judith Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana |
author_facet | Ludwig, Sonja Riemann, Niklas Hans, Stefan Christov, Florian Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian Saxe, Judith Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana |
author_sort | Ludwig, Sonja |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing. METHODS: A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85 dB and/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60 dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (n = 17), while all others belonged to the noRH group (n = 30). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison. RESULTS: We compared 17 RH–30 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A§E(®) phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8897335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88973352022-03-08 Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode Ludwig, Sonja Riemann, Niklas Hans, Stefan Christov, Florian Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian Saxe, Judith Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing. METHODS: A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85 dB and/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60 dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (n = 17), while all others belonged to the noRH group (n = 30). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison. RESULTS: We compared 17 RH–30 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A§E(®) phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8897335/ /pubmed/33830367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Otology Ludwig, Sonja Riemann, Niklas Hans, Stefan Christov, Florian Ludwig, Johannes Maximilian Saxe, Judith Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode |
title | Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode |
title_full | Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode |
title_short | Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode |
title_sort | evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06755-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ludwigsonja evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode AT riemannniklas evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode AT hansstefan evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode AT christovflorian evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode AT ludwigjohannesmaximilian evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode AT saxejudith evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode AT arweilerharbeckdiana evaluationofhearingpreservationinadultswithaslimperimodiolarelectrode |