Cargando…
Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging
INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has been recently presented as new imaging target for malignant diseases and offers high contrast to surrounding normal tissue. FAP tracer uptake has been reported in various tumor entities. The aim of this study was to compare FAP and Prostate-speci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01702-8 |
_version_ | 1784663388912091136 |
---|---|
author | Kessel, Katharina Seifert, Robert Weckesser, Matthias Boegemann, Martin Huss, Sebastian Kratochwil, Clemens Haberkorn, Uwe Giesel, Frederik Rahbar, Kambiz |
author_facet | Kessel, Katharina Seifert, Robert Weckesser, Matthias Boegemann, Martin Huss, Sebastian Kratochwil, Clemens Haberkorn, Uwe Giesel, Frederik Rahbar, Kambiz |
author_sort | Kessel, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has been recently presented as new imaging target for malignant diseases and offers high contrast to surrounding normal tissue. FAP tracer uptake has been reported in various tumor entities. The aim of this study was to compare FAP and Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in primary prostate cancer employing histological analyses and PET imaging in two small patient collectives. METHODS: Two independent small patient collectives were included in this study. For cohort A, data of 5 prostate cancer patients and 3 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia were included. Patients with prostate cancer were initially referred for PSMA PET staging. Radical prostatectomy was performed in all patients and prostate specimen of patients and biopsies of healthy controls were available for further evaluation. Histological workup included HE and immunohistochemistry using PSMA Ab, FAP Ab. Cohort B consists of 6 Patients with diagnosed mCRPC and available PSMA as well as FAP PET. RESULTS: Patients with proven prostate cancer infiltration exhibited strong positivity for PSMA in both primary tumors and lymph node metastases while stainings for FAP were found positive in some cases, but not all (2/5). Controls with BPH presented moderate PSMA staining and in one case also with a positive FAP staining (1/3). PET imaging with FAP seemed to result in more precise results in case of low PSMA expression than PSMA-PET. CONCLUSIONS: While PSMA staining intensity is a valid indicator of prostate cancer in both primary tumor and lymph node metastases, the expression of FAP seems to be heterogeneous but not necessarily linked to cancer-associated fibroblasts. It is also present in inflammation-associated myofibroblasts. Therefore, its ultimate role in prostate cancer diagnosis remains a subject of discussion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8897381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88973812022-03-08 Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging Kessel, Katharina Seifert, Robert Weckesser, Matthias Boegemann, Martin Huss, Sebastian Kratochwil, Clemens Haberkorn, Uwe Giesel, Frederik Rahbar, Kambiz Ann Nucl Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has been recently presented as new imaging target for malignant diseases and offers high contrast to surrounding normal tissue. FAP tracer uptake has been reported in various tumor entities. The aim of this study was to compare FAP and Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in primary prostate cancer employing histological analyses and PET imaging in two small patient collectives. METHODS: Two independent small patient collectives were included in this study. For cohort A, data of 5 prostate cancer patients and 3 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia were included. Patients with prostate cancer were initially referred for PSMA PET staging. Radical prostatectomy was performed in all patients and prostate specimen of patients and biopsies of healthy controls were available for further evaluation. Histological workup included HE and immunohistochemistry using PSMA Ab, FAP Ab. Cohort B consists of 6 Patients with diagnosed mCRPC and available PSMA as well as FAP PET. RESULTS: Patients with proven prostate cancer infiltration exhibited strong positivity for PSMA in both primary tumors and lymph node metastases while stainings for FAP were found positive in some cases, but not all (2/5). Controls with BPH presented moderate PSMA staining and in one case also with a positive FAP staining (1/3). PET imaging with FAP seemed to result in more precise results in case of low PSMA expression than PSMA-PET. CONCLUSIONS: While PSMA staining intensity is a valid indicator of prostate cancer in both primary tumor and lymph node metastases, the expression of FAP seems to be heterogeneous but not necessarily linked to cancer-associated fibroblasts. It is also present in inflammation-associated myofibroblasts. Therefore, its ultimate role in prostate cancer diagnosis remains a subject of discussion. Springer Singapore 2021-12-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8897381/ /pubmed/34854061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01702-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kessel, Katharina Seifert, Robert Weckesser, Matthias Boegemann, Martin Huss, Sebastian Kratochwil, Clemens Haberkorn, Uwe Giesel, Frederik Rahbar, Kambiz Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging |
title | Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging |
title_full | Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging |
title_fullStr | Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging |
title_short | Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging |
title_sort | prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and pet imaging |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01702-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kesselkatharina prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging AT seifertrobert prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging AT weckessermatthias prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging AT boegemannmartin prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging AT husssebastian prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging AT kratochwilclemens prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging AT haberkornuwe prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging AT gieselfrederik prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging AT rahbarkambiz prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging |