Cargando…

Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging

INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has been recently presented as new imaging target for malignant diseases and offers high contrast to surrounding normal tissue. FAP tracer uptake has been reported in various tumor entities. The aim of this study was to compare FAP and Prostate-speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kessel, Katharina, Seifert, Robert, Weckesser, Matthias, Boegemann, Martin, Huss, Sebastian, Kratochwil, Clemens, Haberkorn, Uwe, Giesel, Frederik, Rahbar, Kambiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01702-8
_version_ 1784663388912091136
author Kessel, Katharina
Seifert, Robert
Weckesser, Matthias
Boegemann, Martin
Huss, Sebastian
Kratochwil, Clemens
Haberkorn, Uwe
Giesel, Frederik
Rahbar, Kambiz
author_facet Kessel, Katharina
Seifert, Robert
Weckesser, Matthias
Boegemann, Martin
Huss, Sebastian
Kratochwil, Clemens
Haberkorn, Uwe
Giesel, Frederik
Rahbar, Kambiz
author_sort Kessel, Katharina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has been recently presented as new imaging target for malignant diseases and offers high contrast to surrounding normal tissue. FAP tracer uptake has been reported in various tumor entities. The aim of this study was to compare FAP and Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in primary prostate cancer employing histological analyses and PET imaging in two small patient collectives. METHODS: Two independent small patient collectives were included in this study. For cohort A, data of 5 prostate cancer patients and 3 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia were included. Patients with prostate cancer were initially referred for PSMA PET staging. Radical prostatectomy was performed in all patients and prostate specimen of patients and biopsies of healthy controls were available for further evaluation. Histological workup included HE and immunohistochemistry using PSMA Ab, FAP Ab. Cohort B consists of 6 Patients with diagnosed mCRPC and available PSMA as well as FAP PET. RESULTS: Patients with proven prostate cancer infiltration exhibited strong positivity for PSMA in both primary tumors and lymph node metastases while stainings for FAP were found positive in some cases, but not all (2/5). Controls with BPH presented moderate PSMA staining and in one case also with a positive FAP staining (1/3). PET imaging with FAP seemed to result in more precise results in case of low PSMA expression than PSMA-PET. CONCLUSIONS: While PSMA staining intensity is a valid indicator of prostate cancer in both primary tumor and lymph node metastases, the expression of FAP seems to be heterogeneous but not necessarily linked to cancer-associated fibroblasts. It is also present in inflammation-associated myofibroblasts. Therefore, its ultimate role in prostate cancer diagnosis remains a subject of discussion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8897381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88973812022-03-08 Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging Kessel, Katharina Seifert, Robert Weckesser, Matthias Boegemann, Martin Huss, Sebastian Kratochwil, Clemens Haberkorn, Uwe Giesel, Frederik Rahbar, Kambiz Ann Nucl Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has been recently presented as new imaging target for malignant diseases and offers high contrast to surrounding normal tissue. FAP tracer uptake has been reported in various tumor entities. The aim of this study was to compare FAP and Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in primary prostate cancer employing histological analyses and PET imaging in two small patient collectives. METHODS: Two independent small patient collectives were included in this study. For cohort A, data of 5 prostate cancer patients and 3 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia were included. Patients with prostate cancer were initially referred for PSMA PET staging. Radical prostatectomy was performed in all patients and prostate specimen of patients and biopsies of healthy controls were available for further evaluation. Histological workup included HE and immunohistochemistry using PSMA Ab, FAP Ab. Cohort B consists of 6 Patients with diagnosed mCRPC and available PSMA as well as FAP PET. RESULTS: Patients with proven prostate cancer infiltration exhibited strong positivity for PSMA in both primary tumors and lymph node metastases while stainings for FAP were found positive in some cases, but not all (2/5). Controls with BPH presented moderate PSMA staining and in one case also with a positive FAP staining (1/3). PET imaging with FAP seemed to result in more precise results in case of low PSMA expression than PSMA-PET. CONCLUSIONS: While PSMA staining intensity is a valid indicator of prostate cancer in both primary tumor and lymph node metastases, the expression of FAP seems to be heterogeneous but not necessarily linked to cancer-associated fibroblasts. It is also present in inflammation-associated myofibroblasts. Therefore, its ultimate role in prostate cancer diagnosis remains a subject of discussion. Springer Singapore 2021-12-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8897381/ /pubmed/34854061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01702-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kessel, Katharina
Seifert, Robert
Weckesser, Matthias
Boegemann, Martin
Huss, Sebastian
Kratochwil, Clemens
Haberkorn, Uwe
Giesel, Frederik
Rahbar, Kambiz
Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging
title Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging
title_full Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging
title_fullStr Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging
title_full_unstemmed Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging
title_short Prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and PET imaging
title_sort prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein distribution in prostate cancer: preliminary data on immunohistochemistry and pet imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34854061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01702-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kesselkatharina prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging
AT seifertrobert prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging
AT weckessermatthias prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging
AT boegemannmartin prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging
AT husssebastian prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging
AT kratochwilclemens prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging
AT haberkornuwe prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging
AT gieselfrederik prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging
AT rahbarkambiz prostatespecificmembraneantigenandfibroblastactivationproteindistributioninprostatecancerpreliminarydataonimmunohistochemistryandpetimaging