Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION

To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a ter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong, Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak, Kongsomboon, Kittipong, Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn, Annopawong, Kornkamol, Chantra, Somporn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1
_version_ 1784663428160290816
author Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong
Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak
Kongsomboon, Kittipong
Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn
Annopawong, Kornkamol
Chantra, Somporn
author_facet Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong
Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak
Kongsomboon, Kittipong
Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn
Annopawong, Kornkamol
Chantra, Somporn
author_sort Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary eye center. Cataract patients were scanned with both devices in a random fashion, and parameters from the devices were analyzed in terms of mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman plots were performed to compare agreement between the devices. Ninety-six eyes from 96 patients were enrolled for evaluation. With the exception of ACD, all parameters were significantly different, but excellent agreement was revealed for all of them. The mean difference in axial length was 0.03 mm, and ICC was 0.999. Calculated IOL power with Barrett formula revealed that 93.75% were within 1 diopter and the prediction error was 0.03 diopter. Biometry of the devices were arithmetically different. However, the mean difference of the key factors in IOL calculation were small and appeared to be negligible for the purposes of clinical application. The performance of ANTERION was comparable to that of G6 in biometric measurement and IOL calculation; however, the devices cannot be used interchangeably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8897498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88974982022-03-08 Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak Kongsomboon, Kittipong Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn Annopawong, Kornkamol Chantra, Somporn Sci Rep Article To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary eye center. Cataract patients were scanned with both devices in a random fashion, and parameters from the devices were analyzed in terms of mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman plots were performed to compare agreement between the devices. Ninety-six eyes from 96 patients were enrolled for evaluation. With the exception of ACD, all parameters were significantly different, but excellent agreement was revealed for all of them. The mean difference in axial length was 0.03 mm, and ICC was 0.999. Calculated IOL power with Barrett formula revealed that 93.75% were within 1 diopter and the prediction error was 0.03 diopter. Biometry of the devices were arithmetically different. However, the mean difference of the key factors in IOL calculation were small and appeared to be negligible for the purposes of clinical application. The performance of ANTERION was comparable to that of G6 in biometric measurement and IOL calculation; however, the devices cannot be used interchangeably. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8897498/ /pubmed/35246594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong
Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak
Kongsomboon, Kittipong
Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn
Annopawong, Kornkamol
Chantra, Somporn
Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
title Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
title_full Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
title_short Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
title_sort clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual scheimpflug analyzer, galilei g6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, anterion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wanichwecharungruangboonsong clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion
AT amornpetchsathapornanyarak clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion
AT kongsomboonkittipong clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion
AT wongwijitsookwisakorn clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion
AT annopawongkornkamol clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion
AT chantrasomporn clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion