Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a ter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1 |
_version_ | 1784663428160290816 |
---|---|
author | Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak Kongsomboon, Kittipong Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn Annopawong, Kornkamol Chantra, Somporn |
author_facet | Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak Kongsomboon, Kittipong Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn Annopawong, Kornkamol Chantra, Somporn |
author_sort | Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary eye center. Cataract patients were scanned with both devices in a random fashion, and parameters from the devices were analyzed in terms of mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman plots were performed to compare agreement between the devices. Ninety-six eyes from 96 patients were enrolled for evaluation. With the exception of ACD, all parameters were significantly different, but excellent agreement was revealed for all of them. The mean difference in axial length was 0.03 mm, and ICC was 0.999. Calculated IOL power with Barrett formula revealed that 93.75% were within 1 diopter and the prediction error was 0.03 diopter. Biometry of the devices were arithmetically different. However, the mean difference of the key factors in IOL calculation were small and appeared to be negligible for the purposes of clinical application. The performance of ANTERION was comparable to that of G6 in biometric measurement and IOL calculation; however, the devices cannot be used interchangeably. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8897498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88974982022-03-08 Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak Kongsomboon, Kittipong Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn Annopawong, Kornkamol Chantra, Somporn Sci Rep Article To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary eye center. Cataract patients were scanned with both devices in a random fashion, and parameters from the devices were analyzed in terms of mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman plots were performed to compare agreement between the devices. Ninety-six eyes from 96 patients were enrolled for evaluation. With the exception of ACD, all parameters were significantly different, but excellent agreement was revealed for all of them. The mean difference in axial length was 0.03 mm, and ICC was 0.999. Calculated IOL power with Barrett formula revealed that 93.75% were within 1 diopter and the prediction error was 0.03 diopter. Biometry of the devices were arithmetically different. However, the mean difference of the key factors in IOL calculation were small and appeared to be negligible for the purposes of clinical application. The performance of ANTERION was comparable to that of G6 in biometric measurement and IOL calculation; however, the devices cannot be used interchangeably. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8897498/ /pubmed/35246594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Amornpetchsathaporn, Anyarak Kongsomboon, Kittipong Wongwijitsook, Wisakorn Annopawong, Kornkamol Chantra, Somporn Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION |
title | Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual scheimpflug analyzer, galilei g6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, anterion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanichwecharungruangboonsong clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion AT amornpetchsathapornanyarak clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion AT kongsomboonkittipong clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion AT wongwijitsookwisakorn clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion AT annopawongkornkamol clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion AT chantrasomporn clinicalevaluationofocularbiometryofdualscheimpfluganalyzergalileig6andsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyanterion |