Cargando…

A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters

Ensemble Kalman filters are based on a Gaussian assumption, which can limit their performance in some non-Gaussian settings. This paper reviews two nonlinear, non-Gaussian extensions of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Gaussian anamorphosis (GA) methods and two-step updates, of which the rank histogram f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Grooms, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10141-x
_version_ 1784663441216110592
author Grooms, Ian
author_facet Grooms, Ian
author_sort Grooms, Ian
collection PubMed
description Ensemble Kalman filters are based on a Gaussian assumption, which can limit their performance in some non-Gaussian settings. This paper reviews two nonlinear, non-Gaussian extensions of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Gaussian anamorphosis (GA) methods and two-step updates, of which the rank histogram filter (RHF) is a prototypical example. GA-EnKF methods apply univariate transforms to the state and observation variables to make their distribution more Gaussian before applying an EnKF. The two-step methods use a scalar Bayesian update for the first step, followed by linear regression for the second step. The connection of the two-step framework to the full Bayesian problem is made, which opens the door to more advanced two-step methods in the full Bayesian setting. A new method for the first part of the two-step framework is proposed, with a similar form to the RHF but a different motivation, called the ‘improved RHF’ (iRHF). A suite of experiments with the Lorenz-‘96 model demonstrate situations where the GA-EnKF methods are similar to EnKF, and where they outperform EnKF. The experiments also strongly support the accuracy of the RHF and iRHF filters for nonlinear and non-Gaussian observations; these methods uniformly beat the EnKF and GA-EnKF methods in the experiments reported here. The new iRHF method is only more accurate than RHF at small ensemble sizes in the experiments reported here.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8897550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88975502022-03-07 A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters Grooms, Ian Comput Geosci Original Paper Ensemble Kalman filters are based on a Gaussian assumption, which can limit their performance in some non-Gaussian settings. This paper reviews two nonlinear, non-Gaussian extensions of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Gaussian anamorphosis (GA) methods and two-step updates, of which the rank histogram filter (RHF) is a prototypical example. GA-EnKF methods apply univariate transforms to the state and observation variables to make their distribution more Gaussian before applying an EnKF. The two-step methods use a scalar Bayesian update for the first step, followed by linear regression for the second step. The connection of the two-step framework to the full Bayesian problem is made, which opens the door to more advanced two-step methods in the full Bayesian setting. A new method for the first part of the two-step framework is proposed, with a similar form to the RHF but a different motivation, called the ‘improved RHF’ (iRHF). A suite of experiments with the Lorenz-‘96 model demonstrate situations where the GA-EnKF methods are similar to EnKF, and where they outperform EnKF. The experiments also strongly support the accuracy of the RHF and iRHF filters for nonlinear and non-Gaussian observations; these methods uniformly beat the EnKF and GA-EnKF methods in the experiments reported here. The new iRHF method is only more accurate than RHF at small ensemble sizes in the experiments reported here. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8897550/ /pubmed/35280324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10141-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Grooms, Ian
A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters
title A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters
title_full A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters
title_fullStr A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters
title_short A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters
title_sort comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble kalman filter: gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10141-x
work_keys_str_mv AT groomsian acomparisonofnonlinearextensionstotheensemblekalmanfiltergaussiananamorphosisandtwostepensemblefilters
AT groomsian comparisonofnonlinearextensionstotheensemblekalmanfiltergaussiananamorphosisandtwostepensemblefilters