Cargando…
A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters
Ensemble Kalman filters are based on a Gaussian assumption, which can limit their performance in some non-Gaussian settings. This paper reviews two nonlinear, non-Gaussian extensions of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Gaussian anamorphosis (GA) methods and two-step updates, of which the rank histogram f...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10141-x |
_version_ | 1784663441216110592 |
---|---|
author | Grooms, Ian |
author_facet | Grooms, Ian |
author_sort | Grooms, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ensemble Kalman filters are based on a Gaussian assumption, which can limit their performance in some non-Gaussian settings. This paper reviews two nonlinear, non-Gaussian extensions of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Gaussian anamorphosis (GA) methods and two-step updates, of which the rank histogram filter (RHF) is a prototypical example. GA-EnKF methods apply univariate transforms to the state and observation variables to make their distribution more Gaussian before applying an EnKF. The two-step methods use a scalar Bayesian update for the first step, followed by linear regression for the second step. The connection of the two-step framework to the full Bayesian problem is made, which opens the door to more advanced two-step methods in the full Bayesian setting. A new method for the first part of the two-step framework is proposed, with a similar form to the RHF but a different motivation, called the ‘improved RHF’ (iRHF). A suite of experiments with the Lorenz-‘96 model demonstrate situations where the GA-EnKF methods are similar to EnKF, and where they outperform EnKF. The experiments also strongly support the accuracy of the RHF and iRHF filters for nonlinear and non-Gaussian observations; these methods uniformly beat the EnKF and GA-EnKF methods in the experiments reported here. The new iRHF method is only more accurate than RHF at small ensemble sizes in the experiments reported here. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8897550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88975502022-03-07 A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters Grooms, Ian Comput Geosci Original Paper Ensemble Kalman filters are based on a Gaussian assumption, which can limit their performance in some non-Gaussian settings. This paper reviews two nonlinear, non-Gaussian extensions of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Gaussian anamorphosis (GA) methods and two-step updates, of which the rank histogram filter (RHF) is a prototypical example. GA-EnKF methods apply univariate transforms to the state and observation variables to make their distribution more Gaussian before applying an EnKF. The two-step methods use a scalar Bayesian update for the first step, followed by linear regression for the second step. The connection of the two-step framework to the full Bayesian problem is made, which opens the door to more advanced two-step methods in the full Bayesian setting. A new method for the first part of the two-step framework is proposed, with a similar form to the RHF but a different motivation, called the ‘improved RHF’ (iRHF). A suite of experiments with the Lorenz-‘96 model demonstrate situations where the GA-EnKF methods are similar to EnKF, and where they outperform EnKF. The experiments also strongly support the accuracy of the RHF and iRHF filters for nonlinear and non-Gaussian observations; these methods uniformly beat the EnKF and GA-EnKF methods in the experiments reported here. The new iRHF method is only more accurate than RHF at small ensemble sizes in the experiments reported here. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8897550/ /pubmed/35280324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10141-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Grooms, Ian A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters |
title | A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters |
title_full | A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters |
title_fullStr | A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters |
title_short | A comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble Kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters |
title_sort | comparison of nonlinear extensions to the ensemble kalman filter: gaussian anamorphosis and two-step ensemble filters |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10141-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groomsian acomparisonofnonlinearextensionstotheensemblekalmanfiltergaussiananamorphosisandtwostepensemblefilters AT groomsian comparisonofnonlinearextensionstotheensemblekalmanfiltergaussiananamorphosisandtwostepensemblefilters |