Cargando…
Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review
Many individuals living with severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia, present cognitive deficits and reasoning biases negatively impacting clinical and functional trajectories. Remote cognitive assessment presents many opportunities for advancing research and treatment but has yet to be widely...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00219-x |
_version_ | 1784663441937530880 |
---|---|
author | Lavigne, Katie M. Sauvé, Geneviève Raucher-Chéné, Delphine Guimond, Synthia Lecomte, Tania Bowie, Christopher R. Menon, Mahesh Lal, Shalini Woodward, Todd S. Bodnar, Michael D. Lepage, Martin |
author_facet | Lavigne, Katie M. Sauvé, Geneviève Raucher-Chéné, Delphine Guimond, Synthia Lecomte, Tania Bowie, Christopher R. Menon, Mahesh Lal, Shalini Woodward, Todd S. Bodnar, Michael D. Lepage, Martin |
author_sort | Lavigne, Katie M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many individuals living with severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia, present cognitive deficits and reasoning biases negatively impacting clinical and functional trajectories. Remote cognitive assessment presents many opportunities for advancing research and treatment but has yet to be widely used in psychiatric populations. We conducted a scoping review of remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness to provide an overview of available measures and guide best practices. Overall, 34 studies (n = 20,813 clinical participants) were reviewed and remote measures, psychometrics, facilitators, barriers, and future directions were synthesized using a logic model. We identified 82 measures assessing cognition in severe mental illness across 11 cognitive domains and four device platforms. Remote measures were generally comparable to traditional versions, though psychometric properties were infrequently reported. Facilitators included standardized procedures and wider recruitment, whereas barriers included imprecise measure adaptations, technology inaccessibility, low patient engagement, and poor digital literacy. Our review identified several remote cognitive measures in psychiatry across all cognitive domains. However, there is a need for more rigorous validation of these measures and consideration of potentially influential factors, such as sex and gender. We provide recommendations for conducting remote cognitive assessment in psychiatry and fostering high-quality research using digital technologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8897553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88975532022-03-07 Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review Lavigne, Katie M. Sauvé, Geneviève Raucher-Chéné, Delphine Guimond, Synthia Lecomte, Tania Bowie, Christopher R. Menon, Mahesh Lal, Shalini Woodward, Todd S. Bodnar, Michael D. Lepage, Martin Schizophrenia (Heidelb) Review Article Many individuals living with severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia, present cognitive deficits and reasoning biases negatively impacting clinical and functional trajectories. Remote cognitive assessment presents many opportunities for advancing research and treatment but has yet to be widely used in psychiatric populations. We conducted a scoping review of remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness to provide an overview of available measures and guide best practices. Overall, 34 studies (n = 20,813 clinical participants) were reviewed and remote measures, psychometrics, facilitators, barriers, and future directions were synthesized using a logic model. We identified 82 measures assessing cognition in severe mental illness across 11 cognitive domains and four device platforms. Remote measures were generally comparable to traditional versions, though psychometric properties were infrequently reported. Facilitators included standardized procedures and wider recruitment, whereas barriers included imprecise measure adaptations, technology inaccessibility, low patient engagement, and poor digital literacy. Our review identified several remote cognitive measures in psychiatry across all cognitive domains. However, there is a need for more rigorous validation of these measures and consideration of potentially influential factors, such as sex and gender. We provide recommendations for conducting remote cognitive assessment in psychiatry and fostering high-quality research using digital technologies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8897553/ /pubmed/35249112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00219-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Lavigne, Katie M. Sauvé, Geneviève Raucher-Chéné, Delphine Guimond, Synthia Lecomte, Tania Bowie, Christopher R. Menon, Mahesh Lal, Shalini Woodward, Todd S. Bodnar, Michael D. Lepage, Martin Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review |
title | Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review |
title_full | Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review |
title_short | Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review |
title_sort | remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35249112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00219-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lavignekatiem remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT sauvegenevieve remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT raucherchenedelphine remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT guimondsynthia remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT lecomtetania remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT bowiechristopherr remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT menonmahesh remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT lalshalini remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT woodwardtodds remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT bodnarmichaeld remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview AT lepagemartin remotecognitiveassessmentinseverementalillnessascopingreview |