Cargando…
The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism
Many forensic scientists consider that identification (individualisation) – in the sense of statements of the kind “the questioned item and the known item come from the same source” – is a concept that is central to their discipline. This is so despite decade-long, fundamental critiques levelled by...
Autor principal: | Biedermann, Alex |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35257092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100222 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies
por: Biedermann, Alex, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Preparing computed tomography images for machine learning in forensic and virtual anthropology
por: Lo, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Trauma and coping mechanisms exhibited by forensic science practitioners: A literature review
por: Slack, Donia P.
Publicado: (2020) -
Scientometric analysis of the forensic science literature for fibre as an evidence type: Access and data availability
por: Galais, Virginie, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Human factors in forensic science: The cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise
por: Growns, Bethany, et al.
Publicado: (2020)