Cargando…

How Useful Is Image-Based Active Learning for Plant Organ Segmentation?

Training deep learning models typically requires a huge amount of labeled data which is expensive to acquire, especially in dense prediction tasks such as semantic segmentation. Moreover, plant phenotyping datasets pose additional challenges of heavy occlusion and varied lighting conditions which ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rawat, Shivangana, Chandra, Akshay L., Desai, Sai Vikas, Balasubramanian, Vineeth N., Ninomiya, Seishi, Guo, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AAAS 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280929
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9795275
_version_ 1784663497248866304
author Rawat, Shivangana
Chandra, Akshay L.
Desai, Sai Vikas
Balasubramanian, Vineeth N.
Ninomiya, Seishi
Guo, Wei
author_facet Rawat, Shivangana
Chandra, Akshay L.
Desai, Sai Vikas
Balasubramanian, Vineeth N.
Ninomiya, Seishi
Guo, Wei
author_sort Rawat, Shivangana
collection PubMed
description Training deep learning models typically requires a huge amount of labeled data which is expensive to acquire, especially in dense prediction tasks such as semantic segmentation. Moreover, plant phenotyping datasets pose additional challenges of heavy occlusion and varied lighting conditions which makes annotations more time-consuming to obtain. Active learning helps in reducing the annotation cost by selecting samples for labeling which are most informative to the model, thus improving model performance with fewer annotations. Active learning for semantic segmentation has been well studied on datasets such as PASCAL VOC and Cityscapes. However, its effectiveness on plant datasets has not received much importance. To bridge this gap, we empirically study and benchmark the effectiveness of four uncertainty-based active learning strategies on three natural plant organ segmentation datasets. We also study their behaviour in response to variations in training configurations in terms of augmentations used, the scale of training images, active learning batch sizes, and train-validation set splits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8897744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AAAS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88977442022-03-11 How Useful Is Image-Based Active Learning for Plant Organ Segmentation? Rawat, Shivangana Chandra, Akshay L. Desai, Sai Vikas Balasubramanian, Vineeth N. Ninomiya, Seishi Guo, Wei Plant Phenomics Research Article Training deep learning models typically requires a huge amount of labeled data which is expensive to acquire, especially in dense prediction tasks such as semantic segmentation. Moreover, plant phenotyping datasets pose additional challenges of heavy occlusion and varied lighting conditions which makes annotations more time-consuming to obtain. Active learning helps in reducing the annotation cost by selecting samples for labeling which are most informative to the model, thus improving model performance with fewer annotations. Active learning for semantic segmentation has been well studied on datasets such as PASCAL VOC and Cityscapes. However, its effectiveness on plant datasets has not received much importance. To bridge this gap, we empirically study and benchmark the effectiveness of four uncertainty-based active learning strategies on three natural plant organ segmentation datasets. We also study their behaviour in response to variations in training configurations in terms of augmentations used, the scale of training images, active learning batch sizes, and train-validation set splits. AAAS 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8897744/ /pubmed/35280929 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9795275 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shivangana Rawat et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Exclusive Licensee Nanjing Agricultural University. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Research Article
Rawat, Shivangana
Chandra, Akshay L.
Desai, Sai Vikas
Balasubramanian, Vineeth N.
Ninomiya, Seishi
Guo, Wei
How Useful Is Image-Based Active Learning for Plant Organ Segmentation?
title How Useful Is Image-Based Active Learning for Plant Organ Segmentation?
title_full How Useful Is Image-Based Active Learning for Plant Organ Segmentation?
title_fullStr How Useful Is Image-Based Active Learning for Plant Organ Segmentation?
title_full_unstemmed How Useful Is Image-Based Active Learning for Plant Organ Segmentation?
title_short How Useful Is Image-Based Active Learning for Plant Organ Segmentation?
title_sort how useful is image-based active learning for plant organ segmentation?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280929
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9795275
work_keys_str_mv AT rawatshivangana howusefulisimagebasedactivelearningforplantorgansegmentation
AT chandraakshayl howusefulisimagebasedactivelearningforplantorgansegmentation
AT desaisaivikas howusefulisimagebasedactivelearningforplantorgansegmentation
AT balasubramanianvineethn howusefulisimagebasedactivelearningforplantorgansegmentation
AT ninomiyaseishi howusefulisimagebasedactivelearningforplantorgansegmentation
AT guowei howusefulisimagebasedactivelearningforplantorgansegmentation