Cargando…
Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy
IMPORTANCE: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may have the potential to improve cancer care delivery by enhancing patient quality of life, reducing acute care visits, and extending overall survival. However, the optimal cadence of ePRO assessments is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1078 |
_version_ | 1784663499869257728 |
---|---|
author | Daly, Bobby Nicholas, Kevin Flynn, Jessica Silva, Nicholas Panageas, Katherine Mao, Jun J. Gazit, Lior Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy Sokolowski, Stefania Newman, Tiffanny Perry, Claire Wagner, Isaac Zervoudakis, Alice Salvaggio, Rori Holland, Jessie Chiu, Yeneat O. Kuperman, Gilad J. Simon, Brett A. Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L. Perchick, Wendy |
author_facet | Daly, Bobby Nicholas, Kevin Flynn, Jessica Silva, Nicholas Panageas, Katherine Mao, Jun J. Gazit, Lior Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy Sokolowski, Stefania Newman, Tiffanny Perry, Claire Wagner, Isaac Zervoudakis, Alice Salvaggio, Rori Holland, Jessie Chiu, Yeneat O. Kuperman, Gilad J. Simon, Brett A. Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L. Perchick, Wendy |
author_sort | Daly, Bobby |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may have the potential to improve cancer care delivery by enhancing patient quality of life, reducing acute care visits, and extending overall survival. However, the optimal cadence of ePRO assessments is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine patient response preferences and the clinical value associated with a daily cadence for ePROs for patients receiving antineoplastic treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study of adult patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment assessed a remote monitoring program using ePROs that was developed to manage cancer therapy-related symptoms. ePRO data submitted between October 16, 2018 to February 29, 2020, from a single regional site within the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center network were included. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to January 2022. EXPOSURE: While undergoing active treatment, patients received a daily ePRO assessment that, based on patient responses, generated yellow (moderate) or red (severe) symptom alerts that were sent to clinicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes assessed included patient response rate, symptom alert frequency, and an analysis of the clinical value of daily ePROs. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients (median [range] age, 66 [31-92] years; 103 [47.5%] women and 114 [52.5%] men) initiating antineoplastic therapy at high risk for symptoms were monitored for a median (range) of 91 (2-369) days. Most patients had thoracic (59 patients [27.2%]), head and neck (48 patients [22.1%]), or gastrointestinal (43 patients [19.8%]) malignant neoplasms. Of 14 603 unique symptom assessments completed, 7349 (50.3%) generated red or yellow symptom alerts. Symptoms commonly generating alerts included pain (665 assessments [23.0%]) and functional status (465 assessments [16.1%]). Most assessments (8438 assessments [57.8%]) were completed at home during regular clinic hours (ie, 9 am-5 pm), with higher response rates on weekdays (58.4%; 95% CI, 57.5%-59.5%) than on weekend days (51.3%; 95% CI, 49.5%-53.1%). Importantly, 284 of 630 unique red alerts (45.1%) surfaced without a prior yellow alert for the same symptom within the prior 7 days; symptom severity fluctuated over the course of a week, and symptom assessments generating a red alert were followed by an acute care visit within 7 days 8.7% of the time compared with 2.9% for assessments without a red alert. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that daily ePRO assessments were associated with increased insight into symptom management in patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment and symptom alerts were associated with risk of acute care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8897754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88977542022-03-22 Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy Daly, Bobby Nicholas, Kevin Flynn, Jessica Silva, Nicholas Panageas, Katherine Mao, Jun J. Gazit, Lior Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy Sokolowski, Stefania Newman, Tiffanny Perry, Claire Wagner, Isaac Zervoudakis, Alice Salvaggio, Rori Holland, Jessie Chiu, Yeneat O. Kuperman, Gilad J. Simon, Brett A. Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L. Perchick, Wendy JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may have the potential to improve cancer care delivery by enhancing patient quality of life, reducing acute care visits, and extending overall survival. However, the optimal cadence of ePRO assessments is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine patient response preferences and the clinical value associated with a daily cadence for ePROs for patients receiving antineoplastic treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study of adult patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment assessed a remote monitoring program using ePROs that was developed to manage cancer therapy-related symptoms. ePRO data submitted between October 16, 2018 to February 29, 2020, from a single regional site within the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center network were included. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to January 2022. EXPOSURE: While undergoing active treatment, patients received a daily ePRO assessment that, based on patient responses, generated yellow (moderate) or red (severe) symptom alerts that were sent to clinicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes assessed included patient response rate, symptom alert frequency, and an analysis of the clinical value of daily ePROs. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients (median [range] age, 66 [31-92] years; 103 [47.5%] women and 114 [52.5%] men) initiating antineoplastic therapy at high risk for symptoms were monitored for a median (range) of 91 (2-369) days. Most patients had thoracic (59 patients [27.2%]), head and neck (48 patients [22.1%]), or gastrointestinal (43 patients [19.8%]) malignant neoplasms. Of 14 603 unique symptom assessments completed, 7349 (50.3%) generated red or yellow symptom alerts. Symptoms commonly generating alerts included pain (665 assessments [23.0%]) and functional status (465 assessments [16.1%]). Most assessments (8438 assessments [57.8%]) were completed at home during regular clinic hours (ie, 9 am-5 pm), with higher response rates on weekdays (58.4%; 95% CI, 57.5%-59.5%) than on weekend days (51.3%; 95% CI, 49.5%-53.1%). Importantly, 284 of 630 unique red alerts (45.1%) surfaced without a prior yellow alert for the same symptom within the prior 7 days; symptom severity fluctuated over the course of a week, and symptom assessments generating a red alert were followed by an acute care visit within 7 days 8.7% of the time compared with 2.9% for assessments without a red alert. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that daily ePRO assessments were associated with increased insight into symptom management in patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment and symptom alerts were associated with risk of acute care. American Medical Association 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8897754/ /pubmed/35244701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1078 Text en Copyright 2022 Daly B et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Daly, Bobby Nicholas, Kevin Flynn, Jessica Silva, Nicholas Panageas, Katherine Mao, Jun J. Gazit, Lior Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy Sokolowski, Stefania Newman, Tiffanny Perry, Claire Wagner, Isaac Zervoudakis, Alice Salvaggio, Rori Holland, Jessie Chiu, Yeneat O. Kuperman, Gilad J. Simon, Brett A. Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L. Perchick, Wendy Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy |
title | Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy |
title_full | Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy |
title_fullStr | Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy |
title_short | Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy |
title_sort | analysis of a remote monitoring program for symptoms among adults with cancer receiving antineoplastic therapy |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalybobby analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT nicholaskevin analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT flynnjessica analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT silvanicholas analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT panageaskatherine analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT maojunj analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT gazitlior analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT gorenshteyndmitriy analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT sokolowskistefania analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT newmantiffanny analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT perryclaire analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT wagnerisaac analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT zervoudakisalice analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT salvaggiorori analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT hollandjessie analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT chiuyeneato analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT kupermangiladj analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT simonbretta analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT reidylagunesdianel analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy AT perchickwendy analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy |