Cargando…

Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy

IMPORTANCE: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may have the potential to improve cancer care delivery by enhancing patient quality of life, reducing acute care visits, and extending overall survival. However, the optimal cadence of ePRO assessments is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daly, Bobby, Nicholas, Kevin, Flynn, Jessica, Silva, Nicholas, Panageas, Katherine, Mao, Jun J., Gazit, Lior, Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy, Sokolowski, Stefania, Newman, Tiffanny, Perry, Claire, Wagner, Isaac, Zervoudakis, Alice, Salvaggio, Rori, Holland, Jessie, Chiu, Yeneat O., Kuperman, Gilad J., Simon, Brett A., Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L., Perchick, Wendy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1078
_version_ 1784663499869257728
author Daly, Bobby
Nicholas, Kevin
Flynn, Jessica
Silva, Nicholas
Panageas, Katherine
Mao, Jun J.
Gazit, Lior
Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy
Sokolowski, Stefania
Newman, Tiffanny
Perry, Claire
Wagner, Isaac
Zervoudakis, Alice
Salvaggio, Rori
Holland, Jessie
Chiu, Yeneat O.
Kuperman, Gilad J.
Simon, Brett A.
Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L.
Perchick, Wendy
author_facet Daly, Bobby
Nicholas, Kevin
Flynn, Jessica
Silva, Nicholas
Panageas, Katherine
Mao, Jun J.
Gazit, Lior
Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy
Sokolowski, Stefania
Newman, Tiffanny
Perry, Claire
Wagner, Isaac
Zervoudakis, Alice
Salvaggio, Rori
Holland, Jessie
Chiu, Yeneat O.
Kuperman, Gilad J.
Simon, Brett A.
Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L.
Perchick, Wendy
author_sort Daly, Bobby
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may have the potential to improve cancer care delivery by enhancing patient quality of life, reducing acute care visits, and extending overall survival. However, the optimal cadence of ePRO assessments is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine patient response preferences and the clinical value associated with a daily cadence for ePROs for patients receiving antineoplastic treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study of adult patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment assessed a remote monitoring program using ePROs that was developed to manage cancer therapy-related symptoms. ePRO data submitted between October 16, 2018 to February 29, 2020, from a single regional site within the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center network were included. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to January 2022. EXPOSURE: While undergoing active treatment, patients received a daily ePRO assessment that, based on patient responses, generated yellow (moderate) or red (severe) symptom alerts that were sent to clinicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes assessed included patient response rate, symptom alert frequency, and an analysis of the clinical value of daily ePROs. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients (median [range] age, 66 [31-92] years; 103 [47.5%] women and 114 [52.5%] men) initiating antineoplastic therapy at high risk for symptoms were monitored for a median (range) of 91 (2-369) days. Most patients had thoracic (59 patients [27.2%]), head and neck (48 patients [22.1%]), or gastrointestinal (43 patients [19.8%]) malignant neoplasms. Of 14 603 unique symptom assessments completed, 7349 (50.3%) generated red or yellow symptom alerts. Symptoms commonly generating alerts included pain (665 assessments [23.0%]) and functional status (465 assessments [16.1%]). Most assessments (8438 assessments [57.8%]) were completed at home during regular clinic hours (ie, 9 am-5 pm), with higher response rates on weekdays (58.4%; 95% CI, 57.5%-59.5%) than on weekend days (51.3%; 95% CI, 49.5%-53.1%). Importantly, 284 of 630 unique red alerts (45.1%) surfaced without a prior yellow alert for the same symptom within the prior 7 days; symptom severity fluctuated over the course of a week, and symptom assessments generating a red alert were followed by an acute care visit within 7 days 8.7% of the time compared with 2.9% for assessments without a red alert. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that daily ePRO assessments were associated with increased insight into symptom management in patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment and symptom alerts were associated with risk of acute care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8897754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88977542022-03-22 Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy Daly, Bobby Nicholas, Kevin Flynn, Jessica Silva, Nicholas Panageas, Katherine Mao, Jun J. Gazit, Lior Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy Sokolowski, Stefania Newman, Tiffanny Perry, Claire Wagner, Isaac Zervoudakis, Alice Salvaggio, Rori Holland, Jessie Chiu, Yeneat O. Kuperman, Gilad J. Simon, Brett A. Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L. Perchick, Wendy JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may have the potential to improve cancer care delivery by enhancing patient quality of life, reducing acute care visits, and extending overall survival. However, the optimal cadence of ePRO assessments is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine patient response preferences and the clinical value associated with a daily cadence for ePROs for patients receiving antineoplastic treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study of adult patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment assessed a remote monitoring program using ePROs that was developed to manage cancer therapy-related symptoms. ePRO data submitted between October 16, 2018 to February 29, 2020, from a single regional site within the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center network were included. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to January 2022. EXPOSURE: While undergoing active treatment, patients received a daily ePRO assessment that, based on patient responses, generated yellow (moderate) or red (severe) symptom alerts that were sent to clinicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes assessed included patient response rate, symptom alert frequency, and an analysis of the clinical value of daily ePROs. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients (median [range] age, 66 [31-92] years; 103 [47.5%] women and 114 [52.5%] men) initiating antineoplastic therapy at high risk for symptoms were monitored for a median (range) of 91 (2-369) days. Most patients had thoracic (59 patients [27.2%]), head and neck (48 patients [22.1%]), or gastrointestinal (43 patients [19.8%]) malignant neoplasms. Of 14 603 unique symptom assessments completed, 7349 (50.3%) generated red or yellow symptom alerts. Symptoms commonly generating alerts included pain (665 assessments [23.0%]) and functional status (465 assessments [16.1%]). Most assessments (8438 assessments [57.8%]) were completed at home during regular clinic hours (ie, 9 am-5 pm), with higher response rates on weekdays (58.4%; 95% CI, 57.5%-59.5%) than on weekend days (51.3%; 95% CI, 49.5%-53.1%). Importantly, 284 of 630 unique red alerts (45.1%) surfaced without a prior yellow alert for the same symptom within the prior 7 days; symptom severity fluctuated over the course of a week, and symptom assessments generating a red alert were followed by an acute care visit within 7 days 8.7% of the time compared with 2.9% for assessments without a red alert. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that daily ePRO assessments were associated with increased insight into symptom management in patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment and symptom alerts were associated with risk of acute care. American Medical Association 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8897754/ /pubmed/35244701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1078 Text en Copyright 2022 Daly B et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Daly, Bobby
Nicholas, Kevin
Flynn, Jessica
Silva, Nicholas
Panageas, Katherine
Mao, Jun J.
Gazit, Lior
Gorenshteyn, Dmitriy
Sokolowski, Stefania
Newman, Tiffanny
Perry, Claire
Wagner, Isaac
Zervoudakis, Alice
Salvaggio, Rori
Holland, Jessie
Chiu, Yeneat O.
Kuperman, Gilad J.
Simon, Brett A.
Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L.
Perchick, Wendy
Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy
title Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy
title_full Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy
title_fullStr Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy
title_short Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy
title_sort analysis of a remote monitoring program for symptoms among adults with cancer receiving antineoplastic therapy
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1078
work_keys_str_mv AT dalybobby analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT nicholaskevin analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT flynnjessica analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT silvanicholas analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT panageaskatherine analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT maojunj analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT gazitlior analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT gorenshteyndmitriy analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT sokolowskistefania analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT newmantiffanny analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT perryclaire analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT wagnerisaac analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT zervoudakisalice analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT salvaggiorori analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT hollandjessie analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT chiuyeneato analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT kupermangiladj analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT simonbretta analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT reidylagunesdianel analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy
AT perchickwendy analysisofaremotemonitoringprogramforsymptomsamongadultswithcancerreceivingantineoplastictherapy