Cargando…
Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children
BACKGROUND: Febrile status epilepticus is the most common form of status epilepticus in children. No previous reports compare the effectiveness of treatment strategies using fosphenytoin (fPHT) or phenobarbital (PB) and those using anesthetics as second-line anti-seizure medication for benzodiazepin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35247987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02608-2 |
_version_ | 1784663536006332416 |
---|---|
author | Tokumoto, Shoichi Nishiyama, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Tomioka, Kazumi Ishida, Yusuke Toyoshima, Daisaku Kurosawa, Hiroshi Nozu, Kandai Maruyama, Azusa Tanaka, Ryojiro Iijima, Kazumoto Nagase, Hiroaki |
author_facet | Tokumoto, Shoichi Nishiyama, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Tomioka, Kazumi Ishida, Yusuke Toyoshima, Daisaku Kurosawa, Hiroshi Nozu, Kandai Maruyama, Azusa Tanaka, Ryojiro Iijima, Kazumoto Nagase, Hiroaki |
author_sort | Tokumoto, Shoichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Febrile status epilepticus is the most common form of status epilepticus in children. No previous reports compare the effectiveness of treatment strategies using fosphenytoin (fPHT) or phenobarbital (PB) and those using anesthetics as second-line anti-seizure medication for benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive status epilepticus (CSE). We aimed to examine the outcomes of various treatment strategies for febrile convulsive status epilepticus (FCSE) in a real-world setting while comparing the effects of different treatment protocols and their presence or absence. METHODS: This was a single-center historical cohort study that was divided into three periods. Patients who presented with febrile convulsive status epilepticus for ≥60 min even after the administration of at least one anticonvulsant were included. During period I (October 2002–December 2006), treatment was performed at the discretion of the attending physician, without a protocol. During period II (January 2007–February 2013), barbiturate coma therapy (BCT) was indicated for FCSE resistant to benzodiazepines. During period III (March 2013–April 2016), BCT was indicated for FCSE resistant to fPHT or PB. RESULTS: The rate of electroencephalogram monitoring was lower in period I than period II+III (11.5% vs. 85.7%, p<0.01). Midazolam was administered by continuous infusion more often in period I than period II+III (84.6% vs. 25.0%, p<0.01), whereas fPHT was administered less often in period I than period II+III (0% vs. 27.4%, p<0.01). The rate of poor outcome, which was determined using the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale, was higher in period I than period II+III (23.1% vs. 7.1%, p=0.03). The rate of poor outcome did not differ between periods II and III (4.2% vs. 11.1%, p=0.40). CONCLUSIONS: While the presence of a treatment protocol for FCSE in children may improve outcomes, a treatment protocol using fPHT or PB may not be associated with better outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8897930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88979302022-03-16 Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children Tokumoto, Shoichi Nishiyama, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Tomioka, Kazumi Ishida, Yusuke Toyoshima, Daisaku Kurosawa, Hiroshi Nozu, Kandai Maruyama, Azusa Tanaka, Ryojiro Iijima, Kazumoto Nagase, Hiroaki BMC Neurol Research BACKGROUND: Febrile status epilepticus is the most common form of status epilepticus in children. No previous reports compare the effectiveness of treatment strategies using fosphenytoin (fPHT) or phenobarbital (PB) and those using anesthetics as second-line anti-seizure medication for benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive status epilepticus (CSE). We aimed to examine the outcomes of various treatment strategies for febrile convulsive status epilepticus (FCSE) in a real-world setting while comparing the effects of different treatment protocols and their presence or absence. METHODS: This was a single-center historical cohort study that was divided into three periods. Patients who presented with febrile convulsive status epilepticus for ≥60 min even after the administration of at least one anticonvulsant were included. During period I (October 2002–December 2006), treatment was performed at the discretion of the attending physician, without a protocol. During period II (January 2007–February 2013), barbiturate coma therapy (BCT) was indicated for FCSE resistant to benzodiazepines. During period III (March 2013–April 2016), BCT was indicated for FCSE resistant to fPHT or PB. RESULTS: The rate of electroencephalogram monitoring was lower in period I than period II+III (11.5% vs. 85.7%, p<0.01). Midazolam was administered by continuous infusion more often in period I than period II+III (84.6% vs. 25.0%, p<0.01), whereas fPHT was administered less often in period I than period II+III (0% vs. 27.4%, p<0.01). The rate of poor outcome, which was determined using the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale, was higher in period I than period II+III (23.1% vs. 7.1%, p=0.03). The rate of poor outcome did not differ between periods II and III (4.2% vs. 11.1%, p=0.40). CONCLUSIONS: While the presence of a treatment protocol for FCSE in children may improve outcomes, a treatment protocol using fPHT or PB may not be associated with better outcomes. BioMed Central 2022-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8897930/ /pubmed/35247987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02608-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tokumoto, Shoichi Nishiyama, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Tomioka, Kazumi Ishida, Yusuke Toyoshima, Daisaku Kurosawa, Hiroshi Nozu, Kandai Maruyama, Azusa Tanaka, Ryojiro Iijima, Kazumoto Nagase, Hiroaki Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children |
title | Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children |
title_full | Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children |
title_fullStr | Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children |
title_short | Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children |
title_sort | prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8897930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35247987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02608-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tokumotoshoichi prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT nishiyamamasahiro prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT yamaguchihiroshi prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT tomiokakazumi prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT ishidayusuke prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT toyoshimadaisaku prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT kurosawahiroshi prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT nozukandai prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT maruyamaazusa prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT tanakaryojiro prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT iijimakazumoto prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren AT nagasehiroaki prognosticeffectsoftreatmentprotocolsforfebrileconvulsivestatusepilepticusinchildren |