Cargando…
Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces
OBJECTIVES: Biofilm removal is the decisive factor for the control of peri-implantitis. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) can become an effective aid due to its ability to destroy and to inactivate bacterial biofilm residues. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency of CAP, and air-polishin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04300-0 |
_version_ | 1784663599323545600 |
---|---|
author | Kamionka, Julia Matthes, Rutger Holtfreter, Birte Pink, Christiane Schlüter, Rabea von Woedtke, Thomas Kocher, Thomas Jablonowski, Lukasz |
author_facet | Kamionka, Julia Matthes, Rutger Holtfreter, Birte Pink, Christiane Schlüter, Rabea von Woedtke, Thomas Kocher, Thomas Jablonowski, Lukasz |
author_sort | Kamionka, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Biofilm removal is the decisive factor for the control of peri-implantitis. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) can become an effective aid due to its ability to destroy and to inactivate bacterial biofilm residues. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency of CAP, and air-polishing with glycine (APG) or erythritol (APE) containing powders alone or in combination with CAP (APG + CAP, APE + CAP) on sandblasted/acid etched, and anodised titanium implant surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On respective titanium discs, a 7-day ex vivo human biofilm was grown. Afterwards, the samples were treated with CAP, APG, APE, APG + CAP, and APE + CAP. Sterile and untreated biofilm discs were used for verification. Directly after treatment and after 5 days of incubation in medium at 37 °C, samples were prepared for examination by fluorescence microscopy. The relative biofilm fluorescence was measured for quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Air-polishing with or without CAP removed biofilms effectively. The combination of air-polishing with CAP showed the best cleaning results compared to single treatments, even on day 5. Immediately after treatment, APE + CAP showed insignificant higher cleansing efficiency than APG + CAP. CONCLUSIONS: CAP supports mechanical cleansing and disinfection to remove and inactivate microbial biofilm on implant surfaces significantly. Here, the type of the powder was not important. The highest cleansing results were obtained on sandblasted/etched surfaces. Clinical relevance. Microbial residuals impede wound healing and re-osseointegration after peri-implantitis treatment. Air-polishing treatment removes biofilms very effectively, but not completely. In combination with CAP, microbial free surfaces can be achieved. The tested treatment regime offers an advantage during treatment of peri-implantitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8898218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88982182022-03-08 Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces Kamionka, Julia Matthes, Rutger Holtfreter, Birte Pink, Christiane Schlüter, Rabea von Woedtke, Thomas Kocher, Thomas Jablonowski, Lukasz Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Biofilm removal is the decisive factor for the control of peri-implantitis. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) can become an effective aid due to its ability to destroy and to inactivate bacterial biofilm residues. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency of CAP, and air-polishing with glycine (APG) or erythritol (APE) containing powders alone or in combination with CAP (APG + CAP, APE + CAP) on sandblasted/acid etched, and anodised titanium implant surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On respective titanium discs, a 7-day ex vivo human biofilm was grown. Afterwards, the samples were treated with CAP, APG, APE, APG + CAP, and APE + CAP. Sterile and untreated biofilm discs were used for verification. Directly after treatment and after 5 days of incubation in medium at 37 °C, samples were prepared for examination by fluorescence microscopy. The relative biofilm fluorescence was measured for quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Air-polishing with or without CAP removed biofilms effectively. The combination of air-polishing with CAP showed the best cleaning results compared to single treatments, even on day 5. Immediately after treatment, APE + CAP showed insignificant higher cleansing efficiency than APG + CAP. CONCLUSIONS: CAP supports mechanical cleansing and disinfection to remove and inactivate microbial biofilm on implant surfaces significantly. Here, the type of the powder was not important. The highest cleansing results were obtained on sandblasted/etched surfaces. Clinical relevance. Microbial residuals impede wound healing and re-osseointegration after peri-implantitis treatment. Air-polishing treatment removes biofilms very effectively, but not completely. In combination with CAP, microbial free surfaces can be achieved. The tested treatment regime offers an advantage during treatment of peri-implantitis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8898218/ /pubmed/34988694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04300-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kamionka, Julia Matthes, Rutger Holtfreter, Birte Pink, Christiane Schlüter, Rabea von Woedtke, Thomas Kocher, Thomas Jablonowski, Lukasz Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces |
title | Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces |
title_full | Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces |
title_fullStr | Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces |
title_short | Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces |
title_sort | efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04300-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamionkajulia efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces AT matthesrutger efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces AT holtfreterbirte efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces AT pinkchristiane efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces AT schluterrabea efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces AT vonwoedtkethomas efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces AT kocherthomas efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces AT jablonowskilukasz efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces |