Cargando…

Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces

OBJECTIVES: Biofilm removal is the decisive factor for the control of peri-implantitis. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) can become an effective aid due to its ability to destroy and to inactivate bacterial biofilm residues. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency of CAP, and air-polishin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamionka, Julia, Matthes, Rutger, Holtfreter, Birte, Pink, Christiane, Schlüter, Rabea, von Woedtke, Thomas, Kocher, Thomas, Jablonowski, Lukasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04300-0
_version_ 1784663599323545600
author Kamionka, Julia
Matthes, Rutger
Holtfreter, Birte
Pink, Christiane
Schlüter, Rabea
von Woedtke, Thomas
Kocher, Thomas
Jablonowski, Lukasz
author_facet Kamionka, Julia
Matthes, Rutger
Holtfreter, Birte
Pink, Christiane
Schlüter, Rabea
von Woedtke, Thomas
Kocher, Thomas
Jablonowski, Lukasz
author_sort Kamionka, Julia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Biofilm removal is the decisive factor for the control of peri-implantitis. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) can become an effective aid due to its ability to destroy and to inactivate bacterial biofilm residues. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency of CAP, and air-polishing with glycine (APG) or erythritol (APE) containing powders alone or in combination with CAP (APG + CAP, APE + CAP) on sandblasted/acid etched, and anodised titanium implant surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On respective titanium discs, a 7-day ex vivo human biofilm was grown. Afterwards, the samples were treated with CAP, APG, APE, APG + CAP, and APE + CAP. Sterile and untreated biofilm discs were used for verification. Directly after treatment and after 5 days of incubation in medium at 37 °C, samples were prepared for examination by fluorescence microscopy. The relative biofilm fluorescence was measured for quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Air-polishing with or without CAP removed biofilms effectively. The combination of air-polishing with CAP showed the best cleaning results compared to single treatments, even on day 5. Immediately after treatment, APE + CAP showed insignificant higher cleansing efficiency than APG + CAP. CONCLUSIONS: CAP supports mechanical cleansing and disinfection to remove and inactivate microbial biofilm on implant surfaces significantly. Here, the type of the powder was not important. The highest cleansing results were obtained on sandblasted/etched surfaces. Clinical relevance. Microbial residuals impede wound healing and re-osseointegration after peri-implantitis treatment. Air-polishing treatment removes biofilms very effectively, but not completely. In combination with CAP, microbial free surfaces can be achieved. The tested treatment regime offers an advantage during treatment of peri-implantitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8898218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88982182022-03-08 Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces Kamionka, Julia Matthes, Rutger Holtfreter, Birte Pink, Christiane Schlüter, Rabea von Woedtke, Thomas Kocher, Thomas Jablonowski, Lukasz Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Biofilm removal is the decisive factor for the control of peri-implantitis. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) can become an effective aid due to its ability to destroy and to inactivate bacterial biofilm residues. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency of CAP, and air-polishing with glycine (APG) or erythritol (APE) containing powders alone or in combination with CAP (APG + CAP, APE + CAP) on sandblasted/acid etched, and anodised titanium implant surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On respective titanium discs, a 7-day ex vivo human biofilm was grown. Afterwards, the samples were treated with CAP, APG, APE, APG + CAP, and APE + CAP. Sterile and untreated biofilm discs were used for verification. Directly after treatment and after 5 days of incubation in medium at 37 °C, samples were prepared for examination by fluorescence microscopy. The relative biofilm fluorescence was measured for quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Air-polishing with or without CAP removed biofilms effectively. The combination of air-polishing with CAP showed the best cleaning results compared to single treatments, even on day 5. Immediately after treatment, APE + CAP showed insignificant higher cleansing efficiency than APG + CAP. CONCLUSIONS: CAP supports mechanical cleansing and disinfection to remove and inactivate microbial biofilm on implant surfaces significantly. Here, the type of the powder was not important. The highest cleansing results were obtained on sandblasted/etched surfaces. Clinical relevance. Microbial residuals impede wound healing and re-osseointegration after peri-implantitis treatment. Air-polishing treatment removes biofilms very effectively, but not completely. In combination with CAP, microbial free surfaces can be achieved. The tested treatment regime offers an advantage during treatment of peri-implantitis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8898218/ /pubmed/34988694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04300-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kamionka, Julia
Matthes, Rutger
Holtfreter, Birte
Pink, Christiane
Schlüter, Rabea
von Woedtke, Thomas
Kocher, Thomas
Jablonowski, Lukasz
Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces
title Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces
title_full Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces
title_fullStr Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces
title_short Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces
title_sort efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04300-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kamionkajulia efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces
AT matthesrutger efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces
AT holtfreterbirte efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces
AT pinkchristiane efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces
AT schluterrabea efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces
AT vonwoedtkethomas efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces
AT kocherthomas efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces
AT jablonowskilukasz efficiencyofcoldatmosphericplasmacleaningpowdersandtheircombinationforbiofilmremovalontwodifferenttitaniumimplantsurfaces