Cargando…

Longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with NiTi rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether file design and taper significantly influence microcrack initiation during machine preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted teeth with straight single canals were selected. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups based o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heberer, Marie-Therese, Roggendorf, Hubert C., Faber, Franz-Josef, Lawrenz, Nicolai-Alexander, Frankenberger, Roland, Roggendorf, Matthias J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34787719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04238-3
_version_ 1784663606659383296
author Heberer, Marie-Therese
Roggendorf, Hubert C.
Faber, Franz-Josef
Lawrenz, Nicolai-Alexander
Frankenberger, Roland
Roggendorf, Matthias J.
author_facet Heberer, Marie-Therese
Roggendorf, Hubert C.
Faber, Franz-Josef
Lawrenz, Nicolai-Alexander
Frankenberger, Roland
Roggendorf, Matthias J.
author_sort Heberer, Marie-Therese
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether file design and taper significantly influence microcrack initiation during machine preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted teeth with straight single canals were selected. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups based on their root canal anatomy and the corresponding NiTi rotary file system (I, Mtwo; II, ProTaper Universal; III, F6 SkyTaper; control, no preparation and filling). The root canals of the experimental groups were filled using the single-cone technique. The tested teeth were all subjected to a mechanical chewing simulation with flat lead loading over a period of 3 years (corresponding to 150,000 cycles). The teeth were checked for dentinal defects (accumulative crack growth in length) under the digital microscope (Keyence VHX-5000) at time 0 (baseline prior to chewing simulation) and after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of loading. The cumulative crack increase was statistically analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, Jonckheere–Terpstra test, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In contrast to preparation with greater-tapered instruments, ProTaper Universal (group II) and F6 SkyTaper (group III) instrumentation with the smaller tapered Mtwo files (group I) showed less accumulative propagation of craze lines (p < 0.05) at all time points. CONCLUSION: Instruments with greater taper for root canal instrumentation should be used with care to avoid negative long-term effects in the form of propagation of dentinal defects over time. A positive cutting-edge angle and a smaller taper have a positive effect on a lower craze line development. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Instruments with a positive cutting-edge angle and a smaller taper are beneficial for the long-term preservation of dentinal tooth structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8898247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88982472022-03-08 Longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with NiTi rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation Heberer, Marie-Therese Roggendorf, Hubert C. Faber, Franz-Josef Lawrenz, Nicolai-Alexander Frankenberger, Roland Roggendorf, Matthias J. Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether file design and taper significantly influence microcrack initiation during machine preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted teeth with straight single canals were selected. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups based on their root canal anatomy and the corresponding NiTi rotary file system (I, Mtwo; II, ProTaper Universal; III, F6 SkyTaper; control, no preparation and filling). The root canals of the experimental groups were filled using the single-cone technique. The tested teeth were all subjected to a mechanical chewing simulation with flat lead loading over a period of 3 years (corresponding to 150,000 cycles). The teeth were checked for dentinal defects (accumulative crack growth in length) under the digital microscope (Keyence VHX-5000) at time 0 (baseline prior to chewing simulation) and after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of loading. The cumulative crack increase was statistically analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, Jonckheere–Terpstra test, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In contrast to preparation with greater-tapered instruments, ProTaper Universal (group II) and F6 SkyTaper (group III) instrumentation with the smaller tapered Mtwo files (group I) showed less accumulative propagation of craze lines (p < 0.05) at all time points. CONCLUSION: Instruments with greater taper for root canal instrumentation should be used with care to avoid negative long-term effects in the form of propagation of dentinal defects over time. A positive cutting-edge angle and a smaller taper have a positive effect on a lower craze line development. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Instruments with a positive cutting-edge angle and a smaller taper are beneficial for the long-term preservation of dentinal tooth structure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8898247/ /pubmed/34787719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04238-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Heberer, Marie-Therese
Roggendorf, Hubert C.
Faber, Franz-Josef
Lawrenz, Nicolai-Alexander
Frankenberger, Roland
Roggendorf, Matthias J.
Longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with NiTi rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation
title Longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with NiTi rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation
title_full Longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with NiTi rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation
title_fullStr Longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with NiTi rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with NiTi rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation
title_short Longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with NiTi rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation
title_sort longitudinal craze line propagation in human root dentin after instrumentation with niti rotary files of different instrument tapers after long-term chewing simulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34787719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04238-3
work_keys_str_mv AT heberermarietherese longitudinalcrazelinepropagationinhumanrootdentinafterinstrumentationwithnitirotaryfilesofdifferentinstrumenttapersafterlongtermchewingsimulation
AT roggendorfhubertc longitudinalcrazelinepropagationinhumanrootdentinafterinstrumentationwithnitirotaryfilesofdifferentinstrumenttapersafterlongtermchewingsimulation
AT faberfranzjosef longitudinalcrazelinepropagationinhumanrootdentinafterinstrumentationwithnitirotaryfilesofdifferentinstrumenttapersafterlongtermchewingsimulation
AT lawrenznicolaialexander longitudinalcrazelinepropagationinhumanrootdentinafterinstrumentationwithnitirotaryfilesofdifferentinstrumenttapersafterlongtermchewingsimulation
AT frankenbergerroland longitudinalcrazelinepropagationinhumanrootdentinafterinstrumentationwithnitirotaryfilesofdifferentinstrumenttapersafterlongtermchewingsimulation
AT roggendorfmatthiasj longitudinalcrazelinepropagationinhumanrootdentinafterinstrumentationwithnitirotaryfilesofdifferentinstrumenttapersafterlongtermchewingsimulation