Cargando…

Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map

BACKGROUND: Patient and family engagement (PFE) has been defined as a partnership between patients, families, and health care providers to achieve positive health care outcomes. There is evidence that PFE is critical to improving outcomes. We sought to systematically identify and map the evidence on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aboumatar, Hanan, Pitts, Samantha, Sharma, Ritu, Das, Asar, Smith, Brandon M., Day, Jeff, Holzhauer, Katherine, Yang, Sejean, Bass, Eric B., Bennett, Wendy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01873-5
_version_ 1784663637969862656
author Aboumatar, Hanan
Pitts, Samantha
Sharma, Ritu
Das, Asar
Smith, Brandon M.
Day, Jeff
Holzhauer, Katherine
Yang, Sejean
Bass, Eric B.
Bennett, Wendy L.
author_facet Aboumatar, Hanan
Pitts, Samantha
Sharma, Ritu
Das, Asar
Smith, Brandon M.
Day, Jeff
Holzhauer, Katherine
Yang, Sejean
Bass, Eric B.
Bennett, Wendy L.
author_sort Aboumatar, Hanan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient and family engagement (PFE) has been defined as a partnership between patients, families, and health care providers to achieve positive health care outcomes. There is evidence that PFE is critical to improving outcomes. We sought to systematically identify and map the evidence on PFE strategies for adults with chronic conditions and identify areas needing more research. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane, January 2015 to September 2021 for systematic reviews on strategies for engaging patients with chronic conditions and their caregivers. From each review, we abstracted search dates, number and type of studies, populations, interventions, and outcomes. PFE strategies were categorized into direct patient care, health system, and community-policy level strategies. We found few systematic reviews on strategies at the health system, and none at the community-policy level. In view of this, we also searched for original studies that focused on PFE strategies at those two levels and reviewed the PFE strategies used and study findings. RESULTS: We found 131 reviews of direct patient care strategies, 5 reviews of health system strategies, and no reviews of community-policy strategies. Four original studies addressed PFE at the health system or community-policy levels. Most direct patient care reviews focused on self-management support (SMS) (n = 85) and shared decision-making (SDM) (n = 43). Forty-nine reviews reported positive effects, 35 reported potential benefits, 37 reported unclear benefits, and 4 reported no benefits. Health system level strategies mainly involved patients and caregivers serving on advisory councils. PFE strategies with the strongest evidence focused on SMS particularly for patients with diabetes. Many SDM reviews reported potential benefits especially for patients with cancer. DISCUSSION: Much more evidence exists on the effects of direct patient care strategies on PFE than on the effects of health system or community-policy strategies. Most reviews indicated that direct patient care strategies had positive effects or potential benefits. A limitation of this evidence map is that due to its focus on reviews, which were plentiful, it did not capture details of individual interventions. Nevertheless, this evidence map should help to focus attention on gaps that require more research in efforts to improve PFE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01873-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8898416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88984162022-03-16 Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map Aboumatar, Hanan Pitts, Samantha Sharma, Ritu Das, Asar Smith, Brandon M. Day, Jeff Holzhauer, Katherine Yang, Sejean Bass, Eric B. Bennett, Wendy L. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Patient and family engagement (PFE) has been defined as a partnership between patients, families, and health care providers to achieve positive health care outcomes. There is evidence that PFE is critical to improving outcomes. We sought to systematically identify and map the evidence on PFE strategies for adults with chronic conditions and identify areas needing more research. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane, January 2015 to September 2021 for systematic reviews on strategies for engaging patients with chronic conditions and their caregivers. From each review, we abstracted search dates, number and type of studies, populations, interventions, and outcomes. PFE strategies were categorized into direct patient care, health system, and community-policy level strategies. We found few systematic reviews on strategies at the health system, and none at the community-policy level. In view of this, we also searched for original studies that focused on PFE strategies at those two levels and reviewed the PFE strategies used and study findings. RESULTS: We found 131 reviews of direct patient care strategies, 5 reviews of health system strategies, and no reviews of community-policy strategies. Four original studies addressed PFE at the health system or community-policy levels. Most direct patient care reviews focused on self-management support (SMS) (n = 85) and shared decision-making (SDM) (n = 43). Forty-nine reviews reported positive effects, 35 reported potential benefits, 37 reported unclear benefits, and 4 reported no benefits. Health system level strategies mainly involved patients and caregivers serving on advisory councils. PFE strategies with the strongest evidence focused on SMS particularly for patients with diabetes. Many SDM reviews reported potential benefits especially for patients with cancer. DISCUSSION: Much more evidence exists on the effects of direct patient care strategies on PFE than on the effects of health system or community-policy strategies. Most reviews indicated that direct patient care strategies had positive effects or potential benefits. A limitation of this evidence map is that due to its focus on reviews, which were plentiful, it did not capture details of individual interventions. Nevertheless, this evidence map should help to focus attention on gaps that require more research in efforts to improve PFE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01873-5. BioMed Central 2022-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8898416/ /pubmed/35248149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01873-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Aboumatar, Hanan
Pitts, Samantha
Sharma, Ritu
Das, Asar
Smith, Brandon M.
Day, Jeff
Holzhauer, Katherine
Yang, Sejean
Bass, Eric B.
Bennett, Wendy L.
Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map
title Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map
title_full Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map
title_fullStr Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map
title_full_unstemmed Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map
title_short Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map
title_sort patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01873-5
work_keys_str_mv AT aboumatarhanan patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT pittssamantha patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT sharmaritu patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT dasasar patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT smithbrandonm patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT dayjeff patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT holzhauerkatherine patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT yangsejean patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT bassericb patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap
AT bennettwendyl patientengagementstrategiesforadultswithchronicconditionsanevidencemap