Cargando…

Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation

BACKGROUND: Cage subsidence (CS) was previously reported as one of the most common complications following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). We aimed to assess the impacts of CS on surgical results following OLIF combined with anterolateral fixation, and determine its radiological characterist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Long, Xie, Tianhang, Wang, Xiandi, Yang, Zhiqiang, Pu, Xingxiao, Lu, Yufei, Zeng, Jiancheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05165-4
_version_ 1784663638616834048
author Zhao, Long
Xie, Tianhang
Wang, Xiandi
Yang, Zhiqiang
Pu, Xingxiao
Lu, Yufei
Zeng, Jiancheng
author_facet Zhao, Long
Xie, Tianhang
Wang, Xiandi
Yang, Zhiqiang
Pu, Xingxiao
Lu, Yufei
Zeng, Jiancheng
author_sort Zhao, Long
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cage subsidence (CS) was previously reported as one of the most common complications following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). We aimed to assess the impacts of CS on surgical results following OLIF combined with anterolateral fixation, and determine its radiological characteristics as well as related risk factors. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-two patients who underwent OLIF at L4-5 and with a minimum 12 months follow-up were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups according to the extent of disk height (DH) decrease during follow-up: no CS (DH decrease ≤ 2 mm), mild CS (2 mm < DH decrease ≤ 4 mm) and severe CS (DH decrease > 4 mm). The clinical and radiological results were compared between groups to evaluate radiological features, clinical effects and risk factors of CS. RESULTS: CS was identified in 79 (32.6%) patients, including 48 (19.8%) with mild CS and 31 (11.8%) with severe CS. CS was mainly identified within 1 month postoperatively, it did not progress after 3 months postoperatively, and more noted in the caudal endplate (44, 55.7%). In terms of clinical results, patients in the mild CS group were significantly worse than those in the no CS group, and patients in the severe CS group were significantly worse than those in the mild CS group. There was no significant difference in fusion rate between no CS (92.6%, 151/163) and mild CS (83.3%, 40/48) groups. However, significant lower fusion rate was observed in severe CS group (64.5%, 20/31) compared to no CS group. CS related risk factors included osteoporosis (OR = 5.976), DH overdistraction (OR = 1.175), flat disk space (OR = 3.309) and endplate injury (OR = 6.135). CONCLUSION: CS following OLIF was an early postoperative complication. Higher magnitudes of CS were associated with worse clinical improvements and lower intervertebral fusion. Osteoporosis and endplate injury were significant risk factors for CS. Additionally, flat disk space and DH over-distraction were also correlated with an increased probability of CS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8898418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88984182022-03-16 Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation Zhao, Long Xie, Tianhang Wang, Xiandi Yang, Zhiqiang Pu, Xingxiao Lu, Yufei Zeng, Jiancheng BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Cage subsidence (CS) was previously reported as one of the most common complications following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). We aimed to assess the impacts of CS on surgical results following OLIF combined with anterolateral fixation, and determine its radiological characteristics as well as related risk factors. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-two patients who underwent OLIF at L4-5 and with a minimum 12 months follow-up were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups according to the extent of disk height (DH) decrease during follow-up: no CS (DH decrease ≤ 2 mm), mild CS (2 mm < DH decrease ≤ 4 mm) and severe CS (DH decrease > 4 mm). The clinical and radiological results were compared between groups to evaluate radiological features, clinical effects and risk factors of CS. RESULTS: CS was identified in 79 (32.6%) patients, including 48 (19.8%) with mild CS and 31 (11.8%) with severe CS. CS was mainly identified within 1 month postoperatively, it did not progress after 3 months postoperatively, and more noted in the caudal endplate (44, 55.7%). In terms of clinical results, patients in the mild CS group were significantly worse than those in the no CS group, and patients in the severe CS group were significantly worse than those in the mild CS group. There was no significant difference in fusion rate between no CS (92.6%, 151/163) and mild CS (83.3%, 40/48) groups. However, significant lower fusion rate was observed in severe CS group (64.5%, 20/31) compared to no CS group. CS related risk factors included osteoporosis (OR = 5.976), DH overdistraction (OR = 1.175), flat disk space (OR = 3.309) and endplate injury (OR = 6.135). CONCLUSION: CS following OLIF was an early postoperative complication. Higher magnitudes of CS were associated with worse clinical improvements and lower intervertebral fusion. Osteoporosis and endplate injury were significant risk factors for CS. Additionally, flat disk space and DH over-distraction were also correlated with an increased probability of CS. BioMed Central 2022-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8898418/ /pubmed/35248042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05165-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Long
Xie, Tianhang
Wang, Xiandi
Yang, Zhiqiang
Pu, Xingxiao
Lu, Yufei
Zeng, Jiancheng
Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
title Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
title_full Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
title_fullStr Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
title_short Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
title_sort clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05165-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaolong clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofcagesubsidencefollowingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithanterolateralfixation
AT xietianhang clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofcagesubsidencefollowingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithanterolateralfixation
AT wangxiandi clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofcagesubsidencefollowingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithanterolateralfixation
AT yangzhiqiang clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofcagesubsidencefollowingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithanterolateralfixation
AT puxingxiao clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofcagesubsidencefollowingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithanterolateralfixation
AT luyufei clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofcagesubsidencefollowingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithanterolateralfixation
AT zengjiancheng clinicalandradiologicalevaluationofcagesubsidencefollowingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusioncombinedwithanterolateralfixation