Cargando…

Tracking multiple fish

Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different mov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Děchtěrenko, Filip, Jakubková, Daniela, Lukavský, Jiří, Howard, Christina J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261822
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13031
_version_ 1784663681079967744
author Děchtěrenko, Filip
Jakubková, Daniela
Lukavský, Jiří
Howard, Christina J.
author_facet Děchtěrenko, Filip
Jakubková, Daniela
Lukavský, Jiří
Howard, Christina J.
author_sort Děchtěrenko, Filip
collection PubMed
description Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different movement patterns. One such case is tracking groups of creatures, such as tracking fish in an aquarium. We used movies of fish in an aquarium and measured general tracking performance in this task (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, we compared tracking accuracy within-subjects in fish tracking, tracking typical MOT stimuli, and in a third condition using standard MOT uniform objects which possessed movement patterns similar to the real fish. This third condition was added to further examine the impact of different motion characteristics on tracking performance. Results within a Bayesian framework showed that tracking real fish shares similarities with tracking simple objects in a typical laboratory MOT task. Furthermore, we observed a close relationship between performance in both laboratory MOT tasks (typical and fish-like) and real fish tracking, suggesting that the commonly used laboratory MOT task possesses a good level of ecological validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8898553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88985532022-03-07 Tracking multiple fish Děchtěrenko, Filip Jakubková, Daniela Lukavský, Jiří Howard, Christina J. PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different movement patterns. One such case is tracking groups of creatures, such as tracking fish in an aquarium. We used movies of fish in an aquarium and measured general tracking performance in this task (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, we compared tracking accuracy within-subjects in fish tracking, tracking typical MOT stimuli, and in a third condition using standard MOT uniform objects which possessed movement patterns similar to the real fish. This third condition was added to further examine the impact of different motion characteristics on tracking performance. Results within a Bayesian framework showed that tracking real fish shares similarities with tracking simple objects in a typical laboratory MOT task. Furthermore, we observed a close relationship between performance in both laboratory MOT tasks (typical and fish-like) and real fish tracking, suggesting that the commonly used laboratory MOT task possesses a good level of ecological validity. PeerJ Inc. 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8898553/ /pubmed/35261822 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13031 Text en © 2022 Děchtěrenko et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Psychiatry and Psychology
Děchtěrenko, Filip
Jakubková, Daniela
Lukavský, Jiří
Howard, Christina J.
Tracking multiple fish
title Tracking multiple fish
title_full Tracking multiple fish
title_fullStr Tracking multiple fish
title_full_unstemmed Tracking multiple fish
title_short Tracking multiple fish
title_sort tracking multiple fish
topic Psychiatry and Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261822
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13031
work_keys_str_mv AT dechterenkofilip trackingmultiplefish
AT jakubkovadaniela trackingmultiplefish
AT lukavskyjiri trackingmultiplefish
AT howardchristinaj trackingmultiplefish