Cargando…
Tracking multiple fish
Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different mov...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261822 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13031 |
_version_ | 1784663681079967744 |
---|---|
author | Děchtěrenko, Filip Jakubková, Daniela Lukavský, Jiří Howard, Christina J. |
author_facet | Děchtěrenko, Filip Jakubková, Daniela Lukavský, Jiří Howard, Christina J. |
author_sort | Děchtěrenko, Filip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different movement patterns. One such case is tracking groups of creatures, such as tracking fish in an aquarium. We used movies of fish in an aquarium and measured general tracking performance in this task (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, we compared tracking accuracy within-subjects in fish tracking, tracking typical MOT stimuli, and in a third condition using standard MOT uniform objects which possessed movement patterns similar to the real fish. This third condition was added to further examine the impact of different motion characteristics on tracking performance. Results within a Bayesian framework showed that tracking real fish shares similarities with tracking simple objects in a typical laboratory MOT task. Furthermore, we observed a close relationship between performance in both laboratory MOT tasks (typical and fish-like) and real fish tracking, suggesting that the commonly used laboratory MOT task possesses a good level of ecological validity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8898553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88985532022-03-07 Tracking multiple fish Děchtěrenko, Filip Jakubková, Daniela Lukavský, Jiří Howard, Christina J. PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different movement patterns. One such case is tracking groups of creatures, such as tracking fish in an aquarium. We used movies of fish in an aquarium and measured general tracking performance in this task (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, we compared tracking accuracy within-subjects in fish tracking, tracking typical MOT stimuli, and in a third condition using standard MOT uniform objects which possessed movement patterns similar to the real fish. This third condition was added to further examine the impact of different motion characteristics on tracking performance. Results within a Bayesian framework showed that tracking real fish shares similarities with tracking simple objects in a typical laboratory MOT task. Furthermore, we observed a close relationship between performance in both laboratory MOT tasks (typical and fish-like) and real fish tracking, suggesting that the commonly used laboratory MOT task possesses a good level of ecological validity. PeerJ Inc. 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8898553/ /pubmed/35261822 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13031 Text en © 2022 Děchtěrenko et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry and Psychology Děchtěrenko, Filip Jakubková, Daniela Lukavský, Jiří Howard, Christina J. Tracking multiple fish |
title | Tracking multiple fish |
title_full | Tracking multiple fish |
title_fullStr | Tracking multiple fish |
title_full_unstemmed | Tracking multiple fish |
title_short | Tracking multiple fish |
title_sort | tracking multiple fish |
topic | Psychiatry and Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261822 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dechterenkofilip trackingmultiplefish AT jakubkovadaniela trackingmultiplefish AT lukavskyjiri trackingmultiplefish AT howardchristinaj trackingmultiplefish |