Cargando…

“It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy

OBJECTIVE: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gellman, Caroline, Ezratty, Charlotte, Schwarz, Julia, Kolev, Valentin, Blank, Stephanie V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2022.100948
_version_ 1784663785970073600
author Gellman, Caroline
Ezratty, Charlotte
Schwarz, Julia
Kolev, Valentin
Blank, Stephanie V.
author_facet Gellman, Caroline
Ezratty, Charlotte
Schwarz, Julia
Kolev, Valentin
Blank, Stephanie V.
author_sort Gellman, Caroline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-DO as a risk reduction strategy. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with previvors and transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti® software, two primary investigators interpreted data through thematic analysis. After coding four interviews, the investigators discussed discrepancies between codes with a moderator and resolved and refined code. The investigators applied the universal codebook to all interviews and revised the codebook using an iterative approach. Examining codes within and across interviews allowed for major themes and patterns to emerge. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with seventeen previvors (ages 31–46). 6 (25%) previvors had a BRCA1 mutation, 7 (41%), a BRCA2 mutation, 3 (13%), a Lynch-related mutation, and 1 (6%), other (MUTYH mutation). At the time of interview, 12 previvors (71%) were planning (6) or had undergone (6) RRS-DO, 4 (23%) were planning (1) or had undergone (3) risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and 1 (6%) was undecided. Three major themes emerged: motivating factors for selecting surgical risk reduction option, barriers complicating surgical decision-making, and facilitating factors for surgical decision-making. RRS-DO-focused previvors prioritized avoiding menopause, and they also emphasized that self-advocacy and building rapport with providers facilitated their decision-making. CONCLUSION: By understanding previvors’ priorities and experiences, physicians can better partner with previvors as they navigate their ovarian cancer risk reduction journey. This will ultimately optimize shared decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8898920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88989202022-03-08 “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy Gellman, Caroline Ezratty, Charlotte Schwarz, Julia Kolev, Valentin Blank, Stephanie V. Gynecol Oncol Rep Research Report OBJECTIVE: Previvors are becoming more aware of the option of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRS-DO) to mitigate their risk of ovarian cancer. In this qualitative study, we explored the clinical and non-clinical factors that impacted previvors’ decision-making to pursue RRS-DO as a risk reduction strategy. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with previvors and transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti® software, two primary investigators interpreted data through thematic analysis. After coding four interviews, the investigators discussed discrepancies between codes with a moderator and resolved and refined code. The investigators applied the universal codebook to all interviews and revised the codebook using an iterative approach. Examining codes within and across interviews allowed for major themes and patterns to emerge. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with seventeen previvors (ages 31–46). 6 (25%) previvors had a BRCA1 mutation, 7 (41%), a BRCA2 mutation, 3 (13%), a Lynch-related mutation, and 1 (6%), other (MUTYH mutation). At the time of interview, 12 previvors (71%) were planning (6) or had undergone (6) RRS-DO, 4 (23%) were planning (1) or had undergone (3) risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and 1 (6%) was undecided. Three major themes emerged: motivating factors for selecting surgical risk reduction option, barriers complicating surgical decision-making, and facilitating factors for surgical decision-making. RRS-DO-focused previvors prioritized avoiding menopause, and they also emphasized that self-advocacy and building rapport with providers facilitated their decision-making. CONCLUSION: By understanding previvors’ priorities and experiences, physicians can better partner with previvors as they navigate their ovarian cancer risk reduction journey. This will ultimately optimize shared decision-making. Elsevier 2022-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8898920/ /pubmed/35265744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2022.100948 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Report
Gellman, Caroline
Ezratty, Charlotte
Schwarz, Julia
Kolev, Valentin
Blank, Stephanie V.
“It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_full “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_fullStr “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_full_unstemmed “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_short “It was a no-brainer”: A qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
title_sort “it was a no-brainer”: a qualitative study of factors driving previvors’ decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8898920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2022.100948
work_keys_str_mv AT gellmancaroline itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy
AT ezrattycharlotte itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy
AT schwarzjulia itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy
AT kolevvalentin itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy
AT blankstephaniev itwasanobraineraqualitativestudyoffactorsdrivingprevivorsdecisionmakingwhenconsideringriskreducingsalpingectomywithdelayedoophorectomy