Cargando…

Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016

AIM: This study analyses discourses on marijuana in the Polish daily press and explores ways of defining “the marijuana problem” during a debate about legalisation of medical marijuana. METHODS: 384 press articles published in three national newspapers in 2015–2016 were analysed. The method used was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kępski, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072520936807
_version_ 1784663818916331520
author Kępski, Piotr
author_facet Kępski, Piotr
author_sort Kępski, Piotr
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study analyses discourses on marijuana in the Polish daily press and explores ways of defining “the marijuana problem” during a debate about legalisation of medical marijuana. METHODS: 384 press articles published in three national newspapers in 2015–2016 were analysed. The method used was discourse analysis. The theoretical background was social constructionism, including Spector and Kitsuse’s four-stage constructionist model of defining social problems. RESULTS: The study shows that marijuana problems were mainly constructed through criminal and politically medical discourses. In addition to celebrity and pop culture discourses, recreational marijuana use discourses and social problems discourses were identified. DISCUSSION: The marijuana problem can be defined differently through various discourses. Definitions pertain to diverse marijuana meanings ranging from a negative marijuana-as-drug, through an ambivalent recreational marijuana up to a positively valued medical marijuana. The research pointed out that, from a discursive standpoint, the marijuana problem may be viewed as a complex network of relations between particular discourses, marijuana meanings, claim-makers and the media. CONCLUSION: Different definitions of the marijuana problem are constructed through a dynamic discursive and social process. Various claim-makers try to impose their meanings on marijuana. Mass media are not neutral. They also participate in defining the marijuana problem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8899055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88990552022-03-17 Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016 Kępski, Piotr Nordisk Alkohol Nark Research Reports AIM: This study analyses discourses on marijuana in the Polish daily press and explores ways of defining “the marijuana problem” during a debate about legalisation of medical marijuana. METHODS: 384 press articles published in three national newspapers in 2015–2016 were analysed. The method used was discourse analysis. The theoretical background was social constructionism, including Spector and Kitsuse’s four-stage constructionist model of defining social problems. RESULTS: The study shows that marijuana problems were mainly constructed through criminal and politically medical discourses. In addition to celebrity and pop culture discourses, recreational marijuana use discourses and social problems discourses were identified. DISCUSSION: The marijuana problem can be defined differently through various discourses. Definitions pertain to diverse marijuana meanings ranging from a negative marijuana-as-drug, through an ambivalent recreational marijuana up to a positively valued medical marijuana. The research pointed out that, from a discursive standpoint, the marijuana problem may be viewed as a complex network of relations between particular discourses, marijuana meanings, claim-makers and the media. CONCLUSION: Different definitions of the marijuana problem are constructed through a dynamic discursive and social process. Various claim-makers try to impose their meanings on marijuana. Mass media are not neutral. They also participate in defining the marijuana problem. SAGE Publications 2020-08-24 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8899055/ /pubmed/35308114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072520936807 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Reports
Kępski, Piotr
Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016
title Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016
title_full Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016
title_fullStr Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016
title_full_unstemmed Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016
title_short Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016
title_sort defining “the marijuana problem”: an analysis of the polish daily press, 2015–2016
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072520936807
work_keys_str_mv AT kepskipiotr definingthemarijuanaproblemananalysisofthepolishdailypress20152016