Cargando…
Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016
AIM: This study analyses discourses on marijuana in the Polish daily press and explores ways of defining “the marijuana problem” during a debate about legalisation of medical marijuana. METHODS: 384 press articles published in three national newspapers in 2015–2016 were analysed. The method used was...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072520936807 |
_version_ | 1784663818916331520 |
---|---|
author | Kępski, Piotr |
author_facet | Kępski, Piotr |
author_sort | Kępski, Piotr |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study analyses discourses on marijuana in the Polish daily press and explores ways of defining “the marijuana problem” during a debate about legalisation of medical marijuana. METHODS: 384 press articles published in three national newspapers in 2015–2016 were analysed. The method used was discourse analysis. The theoretical background was social constructionism, including Spector and Kitsuse’s four-stage constructionist model of defining social problems. RESULTS: The study shows that marijuana problems were mainly constructed through criminal and politically medical discourses. In addition to celebrity and pop culture discourses, recreational marijuana use discourses and social problems discourses were identified. DISCUSSION: The marijuana problem can be defined differently through various discourses. Definitions pertain to diverse marijuana meanings ranging from a negative marijuana-as-drug, through an ambivalent recreational marijuana up to a positively valued medical marijuana. The research pointed out that, from a discursive standpoint, the marijuana problem may be viewed as a complex network of relations between particular discourses, marijuana meanings, claim-makers and the media. CONCLUSION: Different definitions of the marijuana problem are constructed through a dynamic discursive and social process. Various claim-makers try to impose their meanings on marijuana. Mass media are not neutral. They also participate in defining the marijuana problem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8899055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88990552022-03-17 Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016 Kępski, Piotr Nordisk Alkohol Nark Research Reports AIM: This study analyses discourses on marijuana in the Polish daily press and explores ways of defining “the marijuana problem” during a debate about legalisation of medical marijuana. METHODS: 384 press articles published in three national newspapers in 2015–2016 were analysed. The method used was discourse analysis. The theoretical background was social constructionism, including Spector and Kitsuse’s four-stage constructionist model of defining social problems. RESULTS: The study shows that marijuana problems were mainly constructed through criminal and politically medical discourses. In addition to celebrity and pop culture discourses, recreational marijuana use discourses and social problems discourses were identified. DISCUSSION: The marijuana problem can be defined differently through various discourses. Definitions pertain to diverse marijuana meanings ranging from a negative marijuana-as-drug, through an ambivalent recreational marijuana up to a positively valued medical marijuana. The research pointed out that, from a discursive standpoint, the marijuana problem may be viewed as a complex network of relations between particular discourses, marijuana meanings, claim-makers and the media. CONCLUSION: Different definitions of the marijuana problem are constructed through a dynamic discursive and social process. Various claim-makers try to impose their meanings on marijuana. Mass media are not neutral. They also participate in defining the marijuana problem. SAGE Publications 2020-08-24 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8899055/ /pubmed/35308114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072520936807 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Kępski, Piotr Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016 |
title | Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish
daily press, 2015–2016 |
title_full | Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish
daily press, 2015–2016 |
title_fullStr | Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish
daily press, 2015–2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish
daily press, 2015–2016 |
title_short | Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish
daily press, 2015–2016 |
title_sort | defining “the marijuana problem”: an analysis of the polish
daily press, 2015–2016 |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35308114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072520936807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kepskipiotr definingthemarijuanaproblemananalysisofthepolishdailypress20152016 |