Cargando…

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Evidence increasingly suggested that impaired respiratory function remained in about 40% of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after discharge, jeopardizing their activities of daily living and quality of life (QoL) in a long term. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Huan, Shi, Hangyu, Liu, Xitong, Sun, Tianheng, Wu, Jiani, Liu, Zhishun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.837420
_version_ 1784663824984440832
author Chen, Huan
Shi, Hangyu
Liu, Xitong
Sun, Tianheng
Wu, Jiani
Liu, Zhishun
author_facet Chen, Huan
Shi, Hangyu
Liu, Xitong
Sun, Tianheng
Wu, Jiani
Liu, Zhishun
author_sort Chen, Huan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence increasingly suggested that impaired respiratory function remained in about 40% of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after discharge, jeopardizing their activities of daily living and quality of life (QoL) in a long term. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can improve exercise capacity and QoL in individuals with chronic lung disease; however, evidence on the effect of PR for patients with post-COIVD-19 was scarce. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PR on lung impairment for patients with post-COVID-19. METHODS: Five databases were searched for all the published trials of PR for patients with post-COVID-19 from 2019 to October 2021. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The risks of bias of included studies were assessed using the Cochrane risk of the bias assessment tool. Data were synthesized where possible; otherwise, qualitative analysis was done. RESULTS: Among 6,000 retrieved studies, 3 studies with 233 patients after COVID-19 were included. The pooled estimate of PR effect on 6-min walk test (6-MWT) (50.41, 95% CI 34.34 to 66.48; p < 0.0001) was in favor of the experiment group with clinical importance. It is found that PR could improve the symptom of dyspnea and QoL; however, its effect on pulmonary function test was inconsistent across studies. The risk of bias of included studies varied, with major concerns on the risk of blinding of participants and interventions performers. CONCLUSION: The review showed that PR could improve exercise capacity measured by 6-MWT among patients with mild-to-moderate lung impairment after COVID-19. The interpretation of effects on lung function, dyspnea, and QoL should be cautious due to inadequate and conflicting data reported across studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021289562, identifier: CRD42021289562.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8899076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88990762022-03-08 Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Chen, Huan Shi, Hangyu Liu, Xitong Sun, Tianheng Wu, Jiani Liu, Zhishun Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Evidence increasingly suggested that impaired respiratory function remained in about 40% of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after discharge, jeopardizing their activities of daily living and quality of life (QoL) in a long term. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can improve exercise capacity and QoL in individuals with chronic lung disease; however, evidence on the effect of PR for patients with post-COIVD-19 was scarce. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PR on lung impairment for patients with post-COVID-19. METHODS: Five databases were searched for all the published trials of PR for patients with post-COVID-19 from 2019 to October 2021. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The risks of bias of included studies were assessed using the Cochrane risk of the bias assessment tool. Data were synthesized where possible; otherwise, qualitative analysis was done. RESULTS: Among 6,000 retrieved studies, 3 studies with 233 patients after COVID-19 were included. The pooled estimate of PR effect on 6-min walk test (6-MWT) (50.41, 95% CI 34.34 to 66.48; p < 0.0001) was in favor of the experiment group with clinical importance. It is found that PR could improve the symptom of dyspnea and QoL; however, its effect on pulmonary function test was inconsistent across studies. The risk of bias of included studies varied, with major concerns on the risk of blinding of participants and interventions performers. CONCLUSION: The review showed that PR could improve exercise capacity measured by 6-MWT among patients with mild-to-moderate lung impairment after COVID-19. The interpretation of effects on lung function, dyspnea, and QoL should be cautious due to inadequate and conflicting data reported across studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021289562, identifier: CRD42021289562. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8899076/ /pubmed/35265644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.837420 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Shi, Liu, Sun, Wu and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Chen, Huan
Shi, Hangyu
Liu, Xitong
Sun, Tianheng
Wu, Jiani
Liu, Zhishun
Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effect of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with post-covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.837420
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhuan effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationforpatientswithpostcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shihangyu effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationforpatientswithpostcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuxitong effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationforpatientswithpostcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suntianheng effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationforpatientswithpostcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wujiani effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationforpatientswithpostcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuzhishun effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationforpatientswithpostcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis