Cargando…

COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany

Background: Hospital staff have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is thus necessary to monitor the situation because infected staff may in turn infect patients and their family members. Following the first wave of infection in the summer of 2020, the Rhine-Maas Hospital (RMK) provided al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stüven, Philipp, Mühlenbruch, Georg, Evenschor-Ascheid, Agnes, Conzen, Ellen, Peters, Claudia, Schablon, Anja, Nienhaus, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284207
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000407
_version_ 1784663971674980352
author Stüven, Philipp
Mühlenbruch, Georg
Evenschor-Ascheid, Agnes
Conzen, Ellen
Peters, Claudia
Schablon, Anja
Nienhaus, Albert
author_facet Stüven, Philipp
Mühlenbruch, Georg
Evenschor-Ascheid, Agnes
Conzen, Ellen
Peters, Claudia
Schablon, Anja
Nienhaus, Albert
author_sort Stüven, Philipp
collection PubMed
description Background: Hospital staff have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is thus necessary to monitor the situation because infected staff may in turn infect patients and their family members. Following the first wave of infection in the summer of 2020, the Rhine-Maas Hospital (RMK) provided all staff the opportunity to be tested for SARS-COV-2 via antibody testing. Methods: The tests were carried out from 19.6.2020 to 17.7.2020. The IgG antibody test qualitatively tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An IgG titre of 0.8 IU/mL or more was considered positive. All staff who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR testing after February 2020 were also included in the study. Occupational and non-occupational risk factors for infection were determined. Staff in the intensive care ward, the emergency depart-ment, or a SARS-CoV-2 ward (“corona ward”) were predefined as having increased exposure. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using logistical regression for occupational and private infection risk. Results: 903 staff members (58.9%) with complete data took part in the cross-sectional study. 52 staff members (5.8%) had a positive PCR test result in their medical history or tested positive in the IgG test. Around half of the infections (55%) were only detected by serological testing during the study. Staff with tasks classified as at-risk had an OR of 1.9 (95% CI 1.04–3.5) for infection. Risk factors also included private contacts to people infected with SARS-CoV-2 and holidays in risk areas. At the time of data collection, 11.5% of those with the disease reported that they had not yet fully recovered from COVID-19. Discussion: Following the first COVID-19 wave, 5.3% of staff at the RMK were infected. An increase in occupational infection risk was found even after controlling for non-occupational infection risks. This should be taken into account with regard to the recognition of COVID-19 as an occupational disease. Methods to improve protection against nosocomial transmissions should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8899717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88997172022-03-11 COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany Stüven, Philipp Mühlenbruch, Georg Evenschor-Ascheid, Agnes Conzen, Ellen Peters, Claudia Schablon, Anja Nienhaus, Albert GMS Hyg Infect Control Article Background: Hospital staff have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is thus necessary to monitor the situation because infected staff may in turn infect patients and their family members. Following the first wave of infection in the summer of 2020, the Rhine-Maas Hospital (RMK) provided all staff the opportunity to be tested for SARS-COV-2 via antibody testing. Methods: The tests were carried out from 19.6.2020 to 17.7.2020. The IgG antibody test qualitatively tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An IgG titre of 0.8 IU/mL or more was considered positive. All staff who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR testing after February 2020 were also included in the study. Occupational and non-occupational risk factors for infection were determined. Staff in the intensive care ward, the emergency depart-ment, or a SARS-CoV-2 ward (“corona ward”) were predefined as having increased exposure. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using logistical regression for occupational and private infection risk. Results: 903 staff members (58.9%) with complete data took part in the cross-sectional study. 52 staff members (5.8%) had a positive PCR test result in their medical history or tested positive in the IgG test. Around half of the infections (55%) were only detected by serological testing during the study. Staff with tasks classified as at-risk had an OR of 1.9 (95% CI 1.04–3.5) for infection. Risk factors also included private contacts to people infected with SARS-CoV-2 and holidays in risk areas. At the time of data collection, 11.5% of those with the disease reported that they had not yet fully recovered from COVID-19. Discussion: Following the first COVID-19 wave, 5.3% of staff at the RMK were infected. An increase in occupational infection risk was found even after controlling for non-occupational infection risks. This should be taken into account with regard to the recognition of COVID-19 as an occupational disease. Methods to improve protection against nosocomial transmissions should be considered. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8899717/ /pubmed/35284207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000407 Text en Copyright © 2022 Stüven et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Stüven, Philipp
Mühlenbruch, Georg
Evenschor-Ascheid, Agnes
Conzen, Ellen
Peters, Claudia
Schablon, Anja
Nienhaus, Albert
COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany
title COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany
title_full COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany
title_fullStr COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany
title_short COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany
title_sort covid-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in germany
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284207
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000407
work_keys_str_mv AT stuvenphilipp covid19infectionsinstaffofanemergencycarehospitalafterthefirstwaveofthepandemicingermany
AT muhlenbruchgeorg covid19infectionsinstaffofanemergencycarehospitalafterthefirstwaveofthepandemicingermany
AT evenschorascheidagnes covid19infectionsinstaffofanemergencycarehospitalafterthefirstwaveofthepandemicingermany
AT conzenellen covid19infectionsinstaffofanemergencycarehospitalafterthefirstwaveofthepandemicingermany
AT petersclaudia covid19infectionsinstaffofanemergencycarehospitalafterthefirstwaveofthepandemicingermany
AT schablonanja covid19infectionsinstaffofanemergencycarehospitalafterthefirstwaveofthepandemicingermany
AT nienhausalbert covid19infectionsinstaffofanemergencycarehospitalafterthefirstwaveofthepandemicingermany