Cargando…
Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encodes all genetic information, and in genetic disorders, DNA sequencing is used as an effective diagnosis. Nanopore/slit is one of the recent and successful tools for DNA sequencing. Passage of DNA along the pores creates non-uniform ionic currents which creates non-uni...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02519-8 |
_version_ | 1784663986430541824 |
---|---|
author | Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Mansouri, Abraham Tarokh, Ali Chini, Seyed Farshid |
author_facet | Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Mansouri, Abraham Tarokh, Ali Chini, Seyed Farshid |
author_sort | Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encodes all genetic information, and in genetic disorders, DNA sequencing is used as an effective diagnosis. Nanopore/slit is one of the recent and successful tools for DNA sequencing. Passage of DNA along the pores creates non-uniform ionic currents which creates non-uniform electric and magnetic fields, accordingly. Sensing the electric field is usually used for sequencing application. We suggest to use the magnetic field induced by pressure-driven ionic currents as a secondary signal. We systematically compared the induced magnetic field of nanopores and nanoslits with equal cross-sectional area. The 3D magnetic field is numerically obtained by solving the Poisson-Nernst-Planck, Ampere, and Navier–Stokes equations. As expected, the maximum value of the maximum magnetic flux occurs near the wall and inside the channel, and increasing the pressure gradient along the pore/slit increases the flowrate and magnetic field, consequently. At a given pressure difference across the pore/slit, nanopores are better than nanoslits in sensing the magnetic flux. For example, by applying 2 MPa across the pore/slit, the maximum magnetic flux density for nanopore, nanoslit [Formula: see text] and nanoslit [Formula: see text] are 1.10 pT, 1.08 pT and 0.45 pT, accordingly. Also, at a given flowrate across the pore/slit, nanoslits are the better choice. It should be noted the external magnetic fields as small as pico-Tesla are detectable and measurable in voltage/pressure driven electrokinetic flow slits. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8899798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88997982022-03-07 Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Mansouri, Abraham Tarokh, Ali Chini, Seyed Farshid Eur Phys J Plus Regular Article Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encodes all genetic information, and in genetic disorders, DNA sequencing is used as an effective diagnosis. Nanopore/slit is one of the recent and successful tools for DNA sequencing. Passage of DNA along the pores creates non-uniform ionic currents which creates non-uniform electric and magnetic fields, accordingly. Sensing the electric field is usually used for sequencing application. We suggest to use the magnetic field induced by pressure-driven ionic currents as a secondary signal. We systematically compared the induced magnetic field of nanopores and nanoslits with equal cross-sectional area. The 3D magnetic field is numerically obtained by solving the Poisson-Nernst-Planck, Ampere, and Navier–Stokes equations. As expected, the maximum value of the maximum magnetic flux occurs near the wall and inside the channel, and increasing the pressure gradient along the pore/slit increases the flowrate and magnetic field, consequently. At a given pressure difference across the pore/slit, nanopores are better than nanoslits in sensing the magnetic flux. For example, by applying 2 MPa across the pore/slit, the maximum magnetic flux density for nanopore, nanoslit [Formula: see text] and nanoslit [Formula: see text] are 1.10 pT, 1.08 pT and 0.45 pT, accordingly. Also, at a given flowrate across the pore/slit, nanoslits are the better choice. It should be noted the external magnetic fields as small as pico-Tesla are detectable and measurable in voltage/pressure driven electrokinetic flow slits. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8899798/ /pubmed/35284202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02519-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Mansouri, Abraham Tarokh, Ali Chini, Seyed Farshid Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits |
title | Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits |
title_full | Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits |
title_fullStr | Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits |
title_full_unstemmed | Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits |
title_short | Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits |
title_sort | ionic current magnetic fields in 3d finite-length nanopores and nanoslits |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02519-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tabatabaeiseyedali ioniccurrentmagneticfieldsin3dfinitelengthnanoporesandnanoslits AT mansouriabraham ioniccurrentmagneticfieldsin3dfinitelengthnanoporesandnanoslits AT tarokhali ioniccurrentmagneticfieldsin3dfinitelengthnanoporesandnanoslits AT chiniseyedfarshid ioniccurrentmagneticfieldsin3dfinitelengthnanoporesandnanoslits |