Cargando…

Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encodes all genetic information, and in genetic disorders, DNA sequencing is used as an effective diagnosis. Nanopore/slit is one of the recent and successful tools for DNA sequencing. Passage of DNA along the pores creates non-uniform ionic currents which creates non-uni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali, Mansouri, Abraham, Tarokh, Ali, Chini, Seyed Farshid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02519-8
_version_ 1784663986430541824
author Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali
Mansouri, Abraham
Tarokh, Ali
Chini, Seyed Farshid
author_facet Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali
Mansouri, Abraham
Tarokh, Ali
Chini, Seyed Farshid
author_sort Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali
collection PubMed
description Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encodes all genetic information, and in genetic disorders, DNA sequencing is used as an effective diagnosis. Nanopore/slit is one of the recent and successful tools for DNA sequencing. Passage of DNA along the pores creates non-uniform ionic currents which creates non-uniform electric and magnetic fields, accordingly. Sensing the electric field is usually used for sequencing application. We suggest to use the magnetic field induced by pressure-driven ionic currents as a secondary signal. We systematically compared the induced magnetic field of nanopores and nanoslits with equal cross-sectional area. The 3D magnetic field is numerically obtained by solving the Poisson-Nernst-Planck, Ampere, and Navier–Stokes equations. As expected, the maximum value of the maximum magnetic flux occurs near the wall and inside the channel, and increasing the pressure gradient along the pore/slit increases the flowrate and magnetic field, consequently. At a given pressure difference across the pore/slit, nanopores are better than nanoslits in sensing the magnetic flux. For example, by applying 2 MPa across the pore/slit, the maximum magnetic flux density for nanopore, nanoslit [Formula: see text] and nanoslit [Formula: see text] are 1.10 pT, 1.08 pT and 0.45 pT, accordingly. Also, at a given flowrate across the pore/slit, nanoslits are the better choice. It should be noted the external magnetic fields as small as pico-Tesla are detectable and measurable in voltage/pressure driven electrokinetic flow slits. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8899798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88997982022-03-07 Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali Mansouri, Abraham Tarokh, Ali Chini, Seyed Farshid Eur Phys J Plus Regular Article Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encodes all genetic information, and in genetic disorders, DNA sequencing is used as an effective diagnosis. Nanopore/slit is one of the recent and successful tools for DNA sequencing. Passage of DNA along the pores creates non-uniform ionic currents which creates non-uniform electric and magnetic fields, accordingly. Sensing the electric field is usually used for sequencing application. We suggest to use the magnetic field induced by pressure-driven ionic currents as a secondary signal. We systematically compared the induced magnetic field of nanopores and nanoslits with equal cross-sectional area. The 3D magnetic field is numerically obtained by solving the Poisson-Nernst-Planck, Ampere, and Navier–Stokes equations. As expected, the maximum value of the maximum magnetic flux occurs near the wall and inside the channel, and increasing the pressure gradient along the pore/slit increases the flowrate and magnetic field, consequently. At a given pressure difference across the pore/slit, nanopores are better than nanoslits in sensing the magnetic flux. For example, by applying 2 MPa across the pore/slit, the maximum magnetic flux density for nanopore, nanoslit [Formula: see text] and nanoslit [Formula: see text] are 1.10 pT, 1.08 pT and 0.45 pT, accordingly. Also, at a given flowrate across the pore/slit, nanoslits are the better choice. It should be noted the external magnetic fields as small as pico-Tesla are detectable and measurable in voltage/pressure driven electrokinetic flow slits. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8899798/ /pubmed/35284202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02519-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali
Mansouri, Abraham
Tarokh, Ali
Chini, Seyed Farshid
Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits
title Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits
title_full Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits
title_fullStr Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits
title_full_unstemmed Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits
title_short Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits
title_sort ionic current magnetic fields in 3d finite-length nanopores and nanoslits
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02519-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tabatabaeiseyedali ioniccurrentmagneticfieldsin3dfinitelengthnanoporesandnanoslits
AT mansouriabraham ioniccurrentmagneticfieldsin3dfinitelengthnanoporesandnanoslits
AT tarokhali ioniccurrentmagneticfieldsin3dfinitelengthnanoporesandnanoslits
AT chiniseyedfarshid ioniccurrentmagneticfieldsin3dfinitelengthnanoporesandnanoslits