Cargando…
An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors, outcomes, and management patterns of patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four women were retrospectively identified with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at our institution between 1/1996...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e13 |
_version_ | 1784664002779938816 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jessie Y. Arkfeld, Christopher K. Tymon-Rosario, Joan Webster, Emily Schwartz, Peter Damast, Shari Menderes, Gulden |
author_facet | Li, Jessie Y. Arkfeld, Christopher K. Tymon-Rosario, Joan Webster, Emily Schwartz, Peter Damast, Shari Menderes, Gulden |
author_sort | Li, Jessie Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors, outcomes, and management patterns of patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four women were retrospectively identified with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at our institution between 1/1996–12/2018. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The χ(2) tests and t-tests were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Five-year RFS was 67.9%, 60.0%, 42.1%, and 20.0% for stage I–IV, respectively. Five-year DSS was 86.2%, 81.6%, 65.0%, and 42.9% for stage I–IV, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive margins predicted overall RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.18–10.73; p=0.025), while presence of lichen sclerosus on pathology (HR=2.78; 95% CI=1.30–5.91; p=0.008) predicted local RFS. OS was predicted by nodal involvement (HR=2.51; 95% CI=1.02–6.13; p=0.043) and positive margins (HR=5.19; 95% CI=2.03–13.26; p=0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved RFS (p=0.016) and DSS (p=0.012) in node-positive patients. Median survival after treatment of local, groin, and pelvic/distant recurrence was 52, 8, and 5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: For primary treatment, more conservative surgical approaches can be considered with escalation of treatment in patients with concurrent precursor lesions, positive margins, and/or nodal involvement. Further studies are warranted to improve risk stratification in order to optimize treatment paradigms for vulvar cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8899873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88998732022-03-11 An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva Li, Jessie Y. Arkfeld, Christopher K. Tymon-Rosario, Joan Webster, Emily Schwartz, Peter Damast, Shari Menderes, Gulden J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors, outcomes, and management patterns of patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four women were retrospectively identified with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at our institution between 1/1996–12/2018. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The χ(2) tests and t-tests were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Five-year RFS was 67.9%, 60.0%, 42.1%, and 20.0% for stage I–IV, respectively. Five-year DSS was 86.2%, 81.6%, 65.0%, and 42.9% for stage I–IV, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive margins predicted overall RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.18–10.73; p=0.025), while presence of lichen sclerosus on pathology (HR=2.78; 95% CI=1.30–5.91; p=0.008) predicted local RFS. OS was predicted by nodal involvement (HR=2.51; 95% CI=1.02–6.13; p=0.043) and positive margins (HR=5.19; 95% CI=2.03–13.26; p=0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved RFS (p=0.016) and DSS (p=0.012) in node-positive patients. Median survival after treatment of local, groin, and pelvic/distant recurrence was 52, 8, and 5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: For primary treatment, more conservative surgical approaches can be considered with escalation of treatment in patients with concurrent precursor lesions, positive margins, and/or nodal involvement. Further studies are warranted to improve risk stratification in order to optimize treatment paradigms for vulvar cancer patients. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8899873/ /pubmed/34910394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e13 Text en Copyright © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Jessie Y. Arkfeld, Christopher K. Tymon-Rosario, Joan Webster, Emily Schwartz, Peter Damast, Shari Menderes, Gulden An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva |
title | An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva |
title_full | An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva |
title_short | An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva |
title_sort | evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijessiey anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT arkfeldchristopherk anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT tymonrosariojoan anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT websteremily anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT schwartzpeter anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT damastshari anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT menderesgulden anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT lijessiey evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT arkfeldchristopherk evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT tymonrosariojoan evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT websteremily evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT schwartzpeter evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT damastshari evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva AT menderesgulden evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva |