Cargando…

An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors, outcomes, and management patterns of patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four women were retrospectively identified with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at our institution between 1/1996...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jessie Y., Arkfeld, Christopher K., Tymon-Rosario, Joan, Webster, Emily, Schwartz, Peter, Damast, Shari, Menderes, Gulden
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e13
_version_ 1784664002779938816
author Li, Jessie Y.
Arkfeld, Christopher K.
Tymon-Rosario, Joan
Webster, Emily
Schwartz, Peter
Damast, Shari
Menderes, Gulden
author_facet Li, Jessie Y.
Arkfeld, Christopher K.
Tymon-Rosario, Joan
Webster, Emily
Schwartz, Peter
Damast, Shari
Menderes, Gulden
author_sort Li, Jessie Y.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors, outcomes, and management patterns of patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four women were retrospectively identified with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at our institution between 1/1996–12/2018. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The χ(2) tests and t-tests were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Five-year RFS was 67.9%, 60.0%, 42.1%, and 20.0% for stage I–IV, respectively. Five-year DSS was 86.2%, 81.6%, 65.0%, and 42.9% for stage I–IV, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive margins predicted overall RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.18–10.73; p=0.025), while presence of lichen sclerosus on pathology (HR=2.78; 95% CI=1.30–5.91; p=0.008) predicted local RFS. OS was predicted by nodal involvement (HR=2.51; 95% CI=1.02–6.13; p=0.043) and positive margins (HR=5.19; 95% CI=2.03–13.26; p=0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved RFS (p=0.016) and DSS (p=0.012) in node-positive patients. Median survival after treatment of local, groin, and pelvic/distant recurrence was 52, 8, and 5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: For primary treatment, more conservative surgical approaches can be considered with escalation of treatment in patients with concurrent precursor lesions, positive margins, and/or nodal involvement. Further studies are warranted to improve risk stratification in order to optimize treatment paradigms for vulvar cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8899873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88998732022-03-11 An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva Li, Jessie Y. Arkfeld, Christopher K. Tymon-Rosario, Joan Webster, Emily Schwartz, Peter Damast, Shari Menderes, Gulden J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors, outcomes, and management patterns of patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four women were retrospectively identified with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at our institution between 1/1996–12/2018. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The χ(2) tests and t-tests were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Five-year RFS was 67.9%, 60.0%, 42.1%, and 20.0% for stage I–IV, respectively. Five-year DSS was 86.2%, 81.6%, 65.0%, and 42.9% for stage I–IV, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive margins predicted overall RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.18–10.73; p=0.025), while presence of lichen sclerosus on pathology (HR=2.78; 95% CI=1.30–5.91; p=0.008) predicted local RFS. OS was predicted by nodal involvement (HR=2.51; 95% CI=1.02–6.13; p=0.043) and positive margins (HR=5.19; 95% CI=2.03–13.26; p=0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved RFS (p=0.016) and DSS (p=0.012) in node-positive patients. Median survival after treatment of local, groin, and pelvic/distant recurrence was 52, 8, and 5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: For primary treatment, more conservative surgical approaches can be considered with escalation of treatment in patients with concurrent precursor lesions, positive margins, and/or nodal involvement. Further studies are warranted to improve risk stratification in order to optimize treatment paradigms for vulvar cancer patients. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8899873/ /pubmed/34910394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e13 Text en Copyright © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Jessie Y.
Arkfeld, Christopher K.
Tymon-Rosario, Joan
Webster, Emily
Schwartz, Peter
Damast, Shari
Menderes, Gulden
An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
title An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
title_full An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
title_fullStr An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
title_short An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
title_sort evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e13
work_keys_str_mv AT lijessiey anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT arkfeldchristopherk anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT tymonrosariojoan anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT websteremily anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT schwartzpeter anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT damastshari anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT menderesgulden anevaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT lijessiey evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT arkfeldchristopherk evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT tymonrosariojoan evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT websteremily evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT schwartzpeter evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT damastshari evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva
AT menderesgulden evaluationofprognosticfactorsoncologicoutcomesandmanagementforprimaryandrecurrentsquamouscellcarcinomaofthevulva