Cargando…

Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: The postoperative period represents a time where patients are at a high-risk of morbidity, which warrants effective surveillance. While digital health interventions (DHIs) for postoperative monitoring are promising, a coordinated, standardized and evidence-based approach regarding thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLean, Kenneth A, Knight, Stephen R, Diehl, Thomas M, Zafar, Syed Nabeel, Bouamrane, Matt, Harrison, Ewen M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000104
_version_ 1784664021080735744
author McLean, Kenneth A
Knight, Stephen R
Diehl, Thomas M
Zafar, Syed Nabeel
Bouamrane, Matt
Harrison, Ewen M
author_facet McLean, Kenneth A
Knight, Stephen R
Diehl, Thomas M
Zafar, Syed Nabeel
Bouamrane, Matt
Harrison, Ewen M
author_sort McLean, Kenneth A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The postoperative period represents a time where patients are at a high-risk of morbidity, which warrants effective surveillance. While digital health interventions (DHIs) for postoperative monitoring are promising, a coordinated, standardized and evidence-based approach regarding their implementation and evaluation is currently lacking. This study aimed to identify DHIs implemented and evaluated in postoperative care to highlight research gaps and assess the readiness for routine implementation. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies describing the implementation and evaluation of DHIs for postoperative monitoring published since 2000 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021264289). This will encompass the Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, and manual search of bibliographies for relevant studies and gray literature. Methodological reporting quality will be evaluated using the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term Follow-up (IDEAL) reporting guideline relevant to the IDEAL stage of the study, and risk of bias will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Data will be extracted according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating DHIs, and a narrative synthesis will be performed. DISCUSSION: This review will assess the readiness for implementation of DHIs for routine postoperative monitoring and will include studies describing best practice from service changes already being piloted out of necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic. This will identify interventions with sufficient evidence to progress to the next IDEAL stage, and promote standardized and comprehensive evaluation of future implementational studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8900039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89000392022-03-22 Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review McLean, Kenneth A Knight, Stephen R Diehl, Thomas M Zafar, Syed Nabeel Bouamrane, Matt Harrison, Ewen M BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol Protocol INTRODUCTION: The postoperative period represents a time where patients are at a high-risk of morbidity, which warrants effective surveillance. While digital health interventions (DHIs) for postoperative monitoring are promising, a coordinated, standardized and evidence-based approach regarding their implementation and evaluation is currently lacking. This study aimed to identify DHIs implemented and evaluated in postoperative care to highlight research gaps and assess the readiness for routine implementation. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies describing the implementation and evaluation of DHIs for postoperative monitoring published since 2000 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021264289). This will encompass the Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, and manual search of bibliographies for relevant studies and gray literature. Methodological reporting quality will be evaluated using the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term Follow-up (IDEAL) reporting guideline relevant to the IDEAL stage of the study, and risk of bias will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Data will be extracted according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating DHIs, and a narrative synthesis will be performed. DISCUSSION: This review will assess the readiness for implementation of DHIs for routine postoperative monitoring and will include studies describing best practice from service changes already being piloted out of necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic. This will identify interventions with sufficient evidence to progress to the next IDEAL stage, and promote standardized and comprehensive evaluation of future implementational studies. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8900039/ /pubmed/35321073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000104 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Protocol
McLean, Kenneth A
Knight, Stephen R
Diehl, Thomas M
Zafar, Syed Nabeel
Bouamrane, Matt
Harrison, Ewen M
Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review
title Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review
title_full Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review
title_fullStr Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review
title_short Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review
title_sort development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000104
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleankennetha developmentstageofnoveldigitalhealthinterventionsforpostoperativemonitoringprotocolofasystematicreview
AT knightstephenr developmentstageofnoveldigitalhealthinterventionsforpostoperativemonitoringprotocolofasystematicreview
AT diehlthomasm developmentstageofnoveldigitalhealthinterventionsforpostoperativemonitoringprotocolofasystematicreview
AT zafarsyednabeel developmentstageofnoveldigitalhealthinterventionsforpostoperativemonitoringprotocolofasystematicreview
AT bouamranematt developmentstageofnoveldigitalhealthinterventionsforpostoperativemonitoringprotocolofasystematicreview
AT harrisonewenm developmentstageofnoveldigitalhealthinterventionsforpostoperativemonitoringprotocolofasystematicreview